The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Exploring the behavioural of distracted drivers during different levels of automation in driving

Exploring the behavioural of distracted drivers during different levels of automation in driving
Exploring the behavioural of distracted drivers during different levels of automation in driving
Increased levels of automation in driving can reduce drivers’ situation-awareness and cause erratic changes to workload and skills degradation following prolonged exposure. In addition, drivers (particularly those who are vulnerable to the onset of boredom/fatigue) may engage in non-driving related, and potentially distracting, secondary tasks. Understanding the behavioural cues associated with this change in driver state can assist in the design and development of future driver monitoring systems that intervene in instances where a driver exhibits ‘high’ levels of distraction. The aim of this study was to explore the behavioural cues associated with distraction caused by a non-driving related secondary task (pseudo-text reading) during manual, partially-automated and highly-automated driving in a medium- fidelity driving simulator. Results from thirty drivers show that highly-automated driving was characterised by reduced workload, increased secondary task times and longer in-vehicle glances, compared to manual and partially-automated driving. In contrast, partially-automated driving was characterised by high workload, poor secondary task performance and low levels of situation awareness. Furthermore, primary and secondary task performance immediately following take-over during partially- automated driving was significantly compromised. The results indicate that the same type of ‘distraction’ can elicit different behavioural cues depending upon the level of automation within driving. This information can be used to further the development of future driver monitoring systems.
Ifsttar
Large, David R.
26786834-d560-4d83-a7c9-05f2dbf02333
Banks, Victoria A.
0dbdcad0-c654-4b87-a804-6a7548d0196d
Burnett, Gary
6ad3ec32-3c84-4d42-a768-dc05e138fc30
Baverstock, Sarah
c0214c68-5954-428d-8625-7fe89d47cbc3
Skrypchuk, Lee
c50ee672-ee07-44bc-83f6-3cbb4ef55d98
Large, David R.
26786834-d560-4d83-a7c9-05f2dbf02333
Banks, Victoria A.
0dbdcad0-c654-4b87-a804-6a7548d0196d
Burnett, Gary
6ad3ec32-3c84-4d42-a768-dc05e138fc30
Baverstock, Sarah
c0214c68-5954-428d-8625-7fe89d47cbc3
Skrypchuk, Lee
c50ee672-ee07-44bc-83f6-3cbb4ef55d98

Large, David R., Banks, Victoria A., Burnett, Gary, Baverstock, Sarah and Skrypchuk, Lee (2017) Exploring the behavioural of distracted drivers during different levels of automation in driving. In DDI2017 Proceedings. Ifsttar. 18 pp .

Record type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)

Abstract

Increased levels of automation in driving can reduce drivers’ situation-awareness and cause erratic changes to workload and skills degradation following prolonged exposure. In addition, drivers (particularly those who are vulnerable to the onset of boredom/fatigue) may engage in non-driving related, and potentially distracting, secondary tasks. Understanding the behavioural cues associated with this change in driver state can assist in the design and development of future driver monitoring systems that intervene in instances where a driver exhibits ‘high’ levels of distraction. The aim of this study was to explore the behavioural cues associated with distraction caused by a non-driving related secondary task (pseudo-text reading) during manual, partially-automated and highly-automated driving in a medium- fidelity driving simulator. Results from thirty drivers show that highly-automated driving was characterised by reduced workload, increased secondary task times and longer in-vehicle glances, compared to manual and partially-automated driving. In contrast, partially-automated driving was characterised by high workload, poor secondary task performance and low levels of situation awareness. Furthermore, primary and secondary task performance immediately following take-over during partially- automated driving was significantly compromised. The results indicate that the same type of ‘distraction’ can elicit different behavioural cues depending upon the level of automation within driving. This information can be used to further the development of future driver monitoring systems.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2017
Venue - Dates: Driver Distraction and Inattention, , Paris, France, 2017-03-20 - 2017-03-22

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 428864
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/428864
PURE UUID: 12e64b9c-0051-4f50-bde3-e2e33ab878e1

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 13 Mar 2019 19:13
Last modified: 11 Dec 2021 21:59

Export record

Contributors

Author: David R. Large
Author: Gary Burnett
Author: Sarah Baverstock
Author: Lee Skrypchuk

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×