Validation and error assessment of the mobile tracer gas dispersion method for measurement of fugitive emissions from area sources
Validation and error assessment of the mobile tracer gas dispersion method for measurement of fugitive emissions from area sources
A controlled release test was carried out to assess the accuracy of the tracer gas dispersion method, which is used to measure whole-site landfill methane (CH4) emissions as well as fugitive emissions from other area sources. Two teams performed measurements using analytical instruments installed in two vehicles, to measure downwind concentrations of target (CH4) and tracer gases at distances of 1.2–3.5 km from the release locations. The controlled target gas release rates were either 5.3 or 10.9 kg CH4 h−1, and target and tracer gases were released at distances between 12 m and 140 m from each other. Five measurement campaigns were performed, where the plume was traversed between 2 and 31 times. The measured target gas emissions agreed well with the controlled releases, with rate differences no greater than 1.1 kg CH4 h−1 for Team A and 1.0 kg CH4 h−1 for Team B when quantifying a controlled release of 10.9 kg CH4 h−1. This corresponds to a maximum error of ±10%. A larger error of up to 18% was seen in the campaign with a lower target gas release rate (5.3 kg CH4 h−1). Using a cross plume integration method to calculate tracer gas to target gas ratios provided the most accurate results (lowest error), whereas larger errors (up to 49%) were observed when using other calculation methods. By establishment of an error budget and comparison with the measured error based on the release test, it could be concluded that following best practice when performing measurements, the overall error of a tracer gas dispersion measurement is very likely to be less than 20%.
Controlled release test, Landfill gas, Methane monitoring, Methane plume measurements, Remote sensing
68-78
Fredenslund, A. M.
523d2abe-f041-415e-a800-1dd5fdb2f3ca
Rees-White, T. C.
852278dd-f628-4d98-a03a-a34fea8c75d6
Beaven, R. P.
5893d749-f03c-4c55-b9c9-e90f00a32b57
Delre, A.
dcce13f4-81ac-4db0-8790-c7fb1451a2d8
Finlayson, A.
9dda453b-3685-40df-a5c5-ab525714f31a
Helmore, J.
9780bebc-5b9c-42d6-ba79-bd735995365f
Allen, G.
878d973e-20df-4a36-ab08-beb23aa0672c
Scheutz, C.
a3d4800e-b39f-4236-98db-4b4f5fa07877
1 January 2019
Fredenslund, A. M.
523d2abe-f041-415e-a800-1dd5fdb2f3ca
Rees-White, T. C.
852278dd-f628-4d98-a03a-a34fea8c75d6
Beaven, R. P.
5893d749-f03c-4c55-b9c9-e90f00a32b57
Delre, A.
dcce13f4-81ac-4db0-8790-c7fb1451a2d8
Finlayson, A.
9dda453b-3685-40df-a5c5-ab525714f31a
Helmore, J.
9780bebc-5b9c-42d6-ba79-bd735995365f
Allen, G.
878d973e-20df-4a36-ab08-beb23aa0672c
Scheutz, C.
a3d4800e-b39f-4236-98db-4b4f5fa07877
Fredenslund, A. M., Rees-White, T. C., Beaven, R. P., Delre, A., Finlayson, A., Helmore, J., Allen, G. and Scheutz, C.
(2019)
Validation and error assessment of the mobile tracer gas dispersion method for measurement of fugitive emissions from area sources.
Waste Management, 83, .
(doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2018.10.036).
Abstract
A controlled release test was carried out to assess the accuracy of the tracer gas dispersion method, which is used to measure whole-site landfill methane (CH4) emissions as well as fugitive emissions from other area sources. Two teams performed measurements using analytical instruments installed in two vehicles, to measure downwind concentrations of target (CH4) and tracer gases at distances of 1.2–3.5 km from the release locations. The controlled target gas release rates were either 5.3 or 10.9 kg CH4 h−1, and target and tracer gases were released at distances between 12 m and 140 m from each other. Five measurement campaigns were performed, where the plume was traversed between 2 and 31 times. The measured target gas emissions agreed well with the controlled releases, with rate differences no greater than 1.1 kg CH4 h−1 for Team A and 1.0 kg CH4 h−1 for Team B when quantifying a controlled release of 10.9 kg CH4 h−1. This corresponds to a maximum error of ±10%. A larger error of up to 18% was seen in the campaign with a lower target gas release rate (5.3 kg CH4 h−1). Using a cross plume integration method to calculate tracer gas to target gas ratios provided the most accurate results (lowest error), whereas larger errors (up to 49%) were observed when using other calculation methods. By establishment of an error budget and comparison with the measured error based on the release test, it could be concluded that following best practice when performing measurements, the overall error of a tracer gas dispersion measurement is very likely to be less than 20%.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 19 October 2018
e-pub ahead of print date: 12 November 2018
Published date: 1 January 2019
Keywords:
Controlled release test, Landfill gas, Methane monitoring, Methane plume measurements, Remote sensing
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 428989
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/428989
ISSN: 0956-053X
PURE UUID: 55cfddb2-9db1-4bad-a406-0702573e45e1
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 15 Mar 2019 17:30
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 03:06
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
A. M. Fredenslund
Author:
A. Delre
Author:
A. Finlayson
Author:
J. Helmore
Author:
G. Allen
Author:
C. Scheutz
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics
