The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

移动百分位数法不同阈值在传染病暴发预警中的效果比较

移动百分位数法不同阈值在传染病暴发预警中的效果比较
移动百分位数法不同阈值在传染病暴发预警中的效果比较

To compare the different thresholds of 'moving percentile method' for outbreak detection in the China Infectious Diseases Automated-alert and Response System (CIDARS). The thresholds of P(50), P(60), P(70), P(80) and P(90) were respectively adopted as the candidates of early warning thresholds on the moving percentile method. Aberration was detected through the reported cases of 19 notifiable infectious diseases nationwide from July 1, 2008 to June 30, 2010. Number of outbreaks and time to detection were recorded and the amount of signals acted as the indicators for determining the optimal threshold of moving percentile method in CIDARS. The optimal threshold for bacillary and amebic dysentery was P(50). For non-cholera infectious diarrhea, dysentery, typhoid and paratyphoid, and epidemic mumps, it was P(60). As for hepatitis A, influenza and rubella, the threshold was P(70), but for epidemic encephalitis B it was P(80). For the following diseases as scarlet fever, typhoid and paratyphoid, hepatitis E, acute hemorrhagic conjunctivitis, malaria, epidemic hemorrhagic fever, meningococcal meningitis, leptospirosis, dengue fever, epidemic endemic typhus, hepatitis C and measles, it was P(90). When adopting the adjusted optimal threshold for 19 infectious diseases respectively, 64 840 (12.20%) signals had a decrease, comparing to the adoption of the former defaulted threshold (P(50)) during the 2 years. However, it did not reduce the number of outbreaks being detected as well as the time to detection, in the two year period. The optimal thresholds of moving percentile method for different kinds of diseases were different. Adoption of the right optimal threshold for a specific disease could further optimize the performance of outbreak detection for CIDARS.

0254-6450
450-453
Sun, Qiao
8ccc39da-bd3b-495f-9aa0-fab50b8e881f
Lai, Sheng Jie
b57a5fe8-cfb6-4fa7-b414-a98bb891b001
Li, Zhong Jie
8c060065-5459-449e-a776-29d55614adb7
Lan, Ya Jia
ae181683-8295-465f-be16-9729b036f136
Zhang, Hong Long
8557347d-5501-40fa-8d22-4db4eb49ac79
Zhao, Dan
574aeefa-2ebd-42c1-873b-d4ee04801e61
Jin, Lian Mei
bae23fe9-8a93-4ebe-b155-31378260bd2f
Yang, Wei Zhong
35daea8e-8d21-43ec-bc93-f39c1c304316
Sun, Qiao
8ccc39da-bd3b-495f-9aa0-fab50b8e881f
Lai, Sheng Jie
b57a5fe8-cfb6-4fa7-b414-a98bb891b001
Li, Zhong Jie
8c060065-5459-449e-a776-29d55614adb7
Lan, Ya Jia
ae181683-8295-465f-be16-9729b036f136
Zhang, Hong Long
8557347d-5501-40fa-8d22-4db4eb49ac79
Zhao, Dan
574aeefa-2ebd-42c1-873b-d4ee04801e61
Jin, Lian Mei
bae23fe9-8a93-4ebe-b155-31378260bd2f
Yang, Wei Zhong
35daea8e-8d21-43ec-bc93-f39c1c304316

Sun, Qiao, Lai, Sheng Jie, Li, Zhong Jie, Lan, Ya Jia, Zhang, Hong Long, Zhao, Dan, Jin, Lian Mei and Yang, Wei Zhong (2011) 移动百分位数法不同阈值在传染病暴发预警中的效果比较. Zhonghua liu xing bing xue za zhi = Zhonghua liuxingbingxue zazhi, 32 (5), 450-453. (doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2011.05.006).

Record type: Article

Abstract

To compare the different thresholds of 'moving percentile method' for outbreak detection in the China Infectious Diseases Automated-alert and Response System (CIDARS). The thresholds of P(50), P(60), P(70), P(80) and P(90) were respectively adopted as the candidates of early warning thresholds on the moving percentile method. Aberration was detected through the reported cases of 19 notifiable infectious diseases nationwide from July 1, 2008 to June 30, 2010. Number of outbreaks and time to detection were recorded and the amount of signals acted as the indicators for determining the optimal threshold of moving percentile method in CIDARS. The optimal threshold for bacillary and amebic dysentery was P(50). For non-cholera infectious diarrhea, dysentery, typhoid and paratyphoid, and epidemic mumps, it was P(60). As for hepatitis A, influenza and rubella, the threshold was P(70), but for epidemic encephalitis B it was P(80). For the following diseases as scarlet fever, typhoid and paratyphoid, hepatitis E, acute hemorrhagic conjunctivitis, malaria, epidemic hemorrhagic fever, meningococcal meningitis, leptospirosis, dengue fever, epidemic endemic typhus, hepatitis C and measles, it was P(90). When adopting the adjusted optimal threshold for 19 infectious diseases respectively, 64 840 (12.20%) signals had a decrease, comparing to the adoption of the former defaulted threshold (P(50)) during the 2 years. However, it did not reduce the number of outbreaks being detected as well as the time to detection, in the two year period. The optimal thresholds of moving percentile method for different kinds of diseases were different. Adoption of the right optimal threshold for a specific disease could further optimize the performance of outbreak detection for CIDARS.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 1 January 2011
Alternative titles: Comparison on the different thresholds on the 'moving percentile method' for outbreak detection

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 429185
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/429185
ISSN: 0254-6450
PURE UUID: 0bf8386e-df93-4c65-95af-8eef12cbb7dd
ORCID for Sheng Jie Lai: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-9781-8148

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 22 Mar 2019 17:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 04:36

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Qiao Sun
Author: Sheng Jie Lai ORCID iD
Author: Zhong Jie Li
Author: Ya Jia Lan
Author: Hong Long Zhang
Author: Dan Zhao
Author: Lian Mei Jin
Author: Wei Zhong Yang

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×