The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Exploring stroke survivors' and physiotherapists' views of self-management after stroke: a qualitative study in the UK

Exploring stroke survivors' and physiotherapists' views of self-management after stroke: a qualitative study in the UK
Exploring stroke survivors' and physiotherapists' views of self-management after stroke: a qualitative study in the UK
Objectives Stroke is a sudden-onset condition with long-term consequences. Self-management could help address long-term consequences of stroke. Stroke survivors' and health professionals' views of self-management may vary, limiting the successful introduction of self-management strategies. This paper explores stroke survivors' and physiotherapists' views of self-management, focusing on what self-management means, and factors perceived to enable and hinder self-management after stroke, to draw out implications for policy, practice and future research.

Design Qualitative study using semistructured interviews and a thematic analysis approach.

Setting Stroke unit and community stroke-rehabilitation services in London, UK.

Participants 13 stroke survivors (8 men and 5 women; aged 53–89 years) admitted to a London stroke unit. 13 physiotherapists: 8 working in an inpatient stroke unit and 5 in community rehabilitation.

Results Key differences were evident in how self-management was understood between these groups. Stroke survivors were unfamiliar with the term self-management, but most could provide their own definition and relate to the term, and understood it as care of the self: ‘doing things for yourself’ and ‘looking after yourself’. They did not recognise self-management as part of their care, but valued therapists as encouraging experts in supporting their recovery after stroke. Physiotherapists commonly understood self-management as a process in which stroke survivors were expected to take an active role in their rehabilitation and manage their recovery and health, with different understandings of self-management among physiotherapists shaped by the context in which they worked. They reported that individual, social and organisational factors enable and hinder self-management after stroke, with individual and organisational barriers particularly evident in the early stages.

Conclusions If self-management support approaches are to be used, further work is required to explore the language and strategies used by professionals to support self-management, and the barriers to supporting self-management at different time points after stroke.
2044-6055
1-8
Sadler, Euan
e5891abe-c97b-4e74-b9b3-6d7c43435360
Wolfe, Charles D A
1fbac47d-38aa-466c-8703-460021974878
Jones, Fiona
a8ff4226-6627-43f1-878e-b6bb6ef853ce
Mckevitt, Christopher
4ff3bb8f-7931-4402-b68d-53aae1cd5570
Sadler, Euan
e5891abe-c97b-4e74-b9b3-6d7c43435360
Wolfe, Charles D A
1fbac47d-38aa-466c-8703-460021974878
Jones, Fiona
a8ff4226-6627-43f1-878e-b6bb6ef853ce
Mckevitt, Christopher
4ff3bb8f-7931-4402-b68d-53aae1cd5570

Sadler, Euan, Wolfe, Charles D A, Jones, Fiona and Mckevitt, Christopher (2017) Exploring stroke survivors' and physiotherapists' views of self-management after stroke: a qualitative study in the UK. BMJ Open, 7 (3), 1-8, [e011631]. (doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011631).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objectives Stroke is a sudden-onset condition with long-term consequences. Self-management could help address long-term consequences of stroke. Stroke survivors' and health professionals' views of self-management may vary, limiting the successful introduction of self-management strategies. This paper explores stroke survivors' and physiotherapists' views of self-management, focusing on what self-management means, and factors perceived to enable and hinder self-management after stroke, to draw out implications for policy, practice and future research.

Design Qualitative study using semistructured interviews and a thematic analysis approach.

Setting Stroke unit and community stroke-rehabilitation services in London, UK.

Participants 13 stroke survivors (8 men and 5 women; aged 53–89 years) admitted to a London stroke unit. 13 physiotherapists: 8 working in an inpatient stroke unit and 5 in community rehabilitation.

Results Key differences were evident in how self-management was understood between these groups. Stroke survivors were unfamiliar with the term self-management, but most could provide their own definition and relate to the term, and understood it as care of the self: ‘doing things for yourself’ and ‘looking after yourself’. They did not recognise self-management as part of their care, but valued therapists as encouraging experts in supporting their recovery after stroke. Physiotherapists commonly understood self-management as a process in which stroke survivors were expected to take an active role in their rehabilitation and manage their recovery and health, with different understandings of self-management among physiotherapists shaped by the context in which they worked. They reported that individual, social and organisational factors enable and hinder self-management after stroke, with individual and organisational barriers particularly evident in the early stages.

Conclusions If self-management support approaches are to be used, further work is required to explore the language and strategies used by professionals to support self-management, and the barriers to supporting self-management at different time points after stroke.

Text
e011631.full - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (765kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 26 January 2017
e-pub ahead of print date: 10 March 2017
Published date: 2017

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 429306
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/429306
ISSN: 2044-6055
PURE UUID: a89fea54-eb2d-4d10-8043-71133569ee21
ORCID for Euan Sadler: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3827-224X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 26 Mar 2019 17:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 04:40

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Euan Sadler ORCID iD
Author: Charles D A Wolfe
Author: Fiona Jones
Author: Christopher Mckevitt

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×