Exploring stroke survivors' and physiotherapists' views of self-management after stroke: a qualitative study in the UK
Exploring stroke survivors' and physiotherapists' views of self-management after stroke: a qualitative study in the UK
Objectives Stroke is a sudden-onset condition with long-term consequences. Self-management could help address long-term consequences of stroke. Stroke survivors' and health professionals' views of self-management may vary, limiting the successful introduction of self-management strategies. This paper explores stroke survivors' and physiotherapists' views of self-management, focusing on what self-management means, and factors perceived to enable and hinder self-management after stroke, to draw out implications for policy, practice and future research.
Design Qualitative study using semistructured interviews and a thematic analysis approach.
Setting Stroke unit and community stroke-rehabilitation services in London, UK.
Participants 13 stroke survivors (8 men and 5 women; aged 53–89 years) admitted to a London stroke unit. 13 physiotherapists: 8 working in an inpatient stroke unit and 5 in community rehabilitation.
Results Key differences were evident in how self-management was understood between these groups. Stroke survivors were unfamiliar with the term self-management, but most could provide their own definition and relate to the term, and understood it as care of the self: ‘doing things for yourself’ and ‘looking after yourself’. They did not recognise self-management as part of their care, but valued therapists as encouraging experts in supporting their recovery after stroke. Physiotherapists commonly understood self-management as a process in which stroke survivors were expected to take an active role in their rehabilitation and manage their recovery and health, with different understandings of self-management among physiotherapists shaped by the context in which they worked. They reported that individual, social and organisational factors enable and hinder self-management after stroke, with individual and organisational barriers particularly evident in the early stages.
Conclusions If self-management support approaches are to be used, further work is required to explore the language and strategies used by professionals to support self-management, and the barriers to supporting self-management at different time points after stroke.
1-8
Sadler, Euan
e5891abe-c97b-4e74-b9b3-6d7c43435360
Wolfe, Charles D A
1fbac47d-38aa-466c-8703-460021974878
Jones, Fiona
a8ff4226-6627-43f1-878e-b6bb6ef853ce
Mckevitt, Christopher
4ff3bb8f-7931-4402-b68d-53aae1cd5570
2017
Sadler, Euan
e5891abe-c97b-4e74-b9b3-6d7c43435360
Wolfe, Charles D A
1fbac47d-38aa-466c-8703-460021974878
Jones, Fiona
a8ff4226-6627-43f1-878e-b6bb6ef853ce
Mckevitt, Christopher
4ff3bb8f-7931-4402-b68d-53aae1cd5570
Sadler, Euan, Wolfe, Charles D A, Jones, Fiona and Mckevitt, Christopher
(2017)
Exploring stroke survivors' and physiotherapists' views of self-management after stroke: a qualitative study in the UK.
BMJ Open, 7 (3), , [e011631].
(doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011631).
Abstract
Objectives Stroke is a sudden-onset condition with long-term consequences. Self-management could help address long-term consequences of stroke. Stroke survivors' and health professionals' views of self-management may vary, limiting the successful introduction of self-management strategies. This paper explores stroke survivors' and physiotherapists' views of self-management, focusing on what self-management means, and factors perceived to enable and hinder self-management after stroke, to draw out implications for policy, practice and future research.
Design Qualitative study using semistructured interviews and a thematic analysis approach.
Setting Stroke unit and community stroke-rehabilitation services in London, UK.
Participants 13 stroke survivors (8 men and 5 women; aged 53–89 years) admitted to a London stroke unit. 13 physiotherapists: 8 working in an inpatient stroke unit and 5 in community rehabilitation.
Results Key differences were evident in how self-management was understood between these groups. Stroke survivors were unfamiliar with the term self-management, but most could provide their own definition and relate to the term, and understood it as care of the self: ‘doing things for yourself’ and ‘looking after yourself’. They did not recognise self-management as part of their care, but valued therapists as encouraging experts in supporting their recovery after stroke. Physiotherapists commonly understood self-management as a process in which stroke survivors were expected to take an active role in their rehabilitation and manage their recovery and health, with different understandings of self-management among physiotherapists shaped by the context in which they worked. They reported that individual, social and organisational factors enable and hinder self-management after stroke, with individual and organisational barriers particularly evident in the early stages.
Conclusions If self-management support approaches are to be used, further work is required to explore the language and strategies used by professionals to support self-management, and the barriers to supporting self-management at different time points after stroke.
Text
e011631.full
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 26 January 2017
e-pub ahead of print date: 10 March 2017
Published date: 2017
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 429306
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/429306
ISSN: 2044-6055
PURE UUID: a89fea54-eb2d-4d10-8043-71133569ee21
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 26 Mar 2019 17:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 04:40
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Charles D A Wolfe
Author:
Fiona Jones
Author:
Christopher Mckevitt
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics