The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Challenges to rationality: an examination on the influence of environmental conditions on decision making in real-world financial markets

Challenges to rationality: an examination on the influence of environmental conditions on decision making in real-world financial markets
Challenges to rationality: an examination on the influence of environmental conditions on decision making in real-world financial markets
This thesis, which is divided into three papers, investigates the influence of weather and other atmospheric conditions on decision making in naturalistic environments and its implications for market efficiency and forecasting. The decision setting chosen is the UK horserace betting market. The distinctive features of this setting which enables to investigate behaviour more clearly than in other financial markets is the generation of an unequivocal outcome (a winner) within a finite time frame, thus offering an objective benchmark to inspect decision making anomalies and factors which may have caused them.

The first paper investigates the influence of weather and other atmospheric factors on the performance of horses and jockeys, and the extent to which probability estimates derived from betting markets odds can be improved by incorporating this influence. The findings suggest that bettors do not fully account for such influence on horserace performance, and by correcting such inefficiency in odds, forecasting power was significantly improved. It was also demonstrated that substantial economic gains were attainable when adopting forecasts that make full use of information related to the influence of weather and other atmospheric conditions on the performance of horses and jockeys. The findings of this paper have important implications as they may suggest that in a far wider variety of naturalistic contexts, decision makers may not be making full use of relevant information that is publicly available. This is likely to lead to sub-optimal decisions and, in particular reduce forecasting performance, leading to misleading forecasts.

The second paper explores whether the calibration of probabilistic forecasts derived from betting odds are affected by weather and other atmospheric conditions, via misattribution of mood, as well as the extent to which these probability estimates can be improved by correcting for any misattribution of mood detected. This paper shows that after discounting the effects of the prevailing weather and other atmospheric conditions on the performance of horses and jockeys, the accuracy of probabilistic forecasts derived from betting odds are systematically affected by the same conditions. By correcting for misattribution of mood, this paper shows that significantly better forecasts can be derived from betting odds, and that these have substantial economic value. The principal conclusion from this paper is that when the purpose of a financial market is to derive accurate probabilistic estimates from final contract prices, forecast accuracy can be substantially improved by understanding and correcting for situations where markets systematically under-perform.

The third paper addresses the conflicting and inconclusive evidence of the existence of weather effects, via misattribution of mood, on market efficiency in naturalistic financial markets. A review on research on weather-induced misattribution of mood in naturalistic financial markets indicates that shortcomings in previous research may be the foundation to these conflicting and inconclusive results. This paper then proposes that investigating the influence of weather-induced misattribution of mood on the level of favourite-longshot bias (FLB) (a phenomenon whereby favourites/longshots are under-/over-bet) displayed in horserace betting markets addresses all shortcomings identified in previous research. The results show that under weather conditions when individuals are expected to experience good mood (cf. bad mood), they over-/underestimate the winning probabilities of longshot/favourite contestants at a greater extent, and that such effect inflict substantial economic cost on decision makers. Remarkably, these results remain significant when controlling for various factors known to influence the FLB, hence providing robust evidence to support the conclusions that weather-induced misattribution of mood can significantly affect decision making in a naturalistic financial market, and that (in horserace markets) it is weather conditions associated with good mood which damage decision quality. Importantly, the results of this paper suggest that decision anomalies may be innate to the human decision making process.
University of Southampton
Costa Sperb, Luis Felipe
9e42a3f1-c9be-45b9-8680-eb558b52aab3
Costa Sperb, Luis Felipe
9e42a3f1-c9be-45b9-8680-eb558b52aab3
Johnson, Johnnie
6d9f1a51-38a8-4011-a792-bfc82040fac4

Costa Sperb, Luis Felipe (2019) Challenges to rationality: an examination on the influence of environmental conditions on decision making in real-world financial markets. University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis, 151pp.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

This thesis, which is divided into three papers, investigates the influence of weather and other atmospheric conditions on decision making in naturalistic environments and its implications for market efficiency and forecasting. The decision setting chosen is the UK horserace betting market. The distinctive features of this setting which enables to investigate behaviour more clearly than in other financial markets is the generation of an unequivocal outcome (a winner) within a finite time frame, thus offering an objective benchmark to inspect decision making anomalies and factors which may have caused them.

The first paper investigates the influence of weather and other atmospheric factors on the performance of horses and jockeys, and the extent to which probability estimates derived from betting markets odds can be improved by incorporating this influence. The findings suggest that bettors do not fully account for such influence on horserace performance, and by correcting such inefficiency in odds, forecasting power was significantly improved. It was also demonstrated that substantial economic gains were attainable when adopting forecasts that make full use of information related to the influence of weather and other atmospheric conditions on the performance of horses and jockeys. The findings of this paper have important implications as they may suggest that in a far wider variety of naturalistic contexts, decision makers may not be making full use of relevant information that is publicly available. This is likely to lead to sub-optimal decisions and, in particular reduce forecasting performance, leading to misleading forecasts.

The second paper explores whether the calibration of probabilistic forecasts derived from betting odds are affected by weather and other atmospheric conditions, via misattribution of mood, as well as the extent to which these probability estimates can be improved by correcting for any misattribution of mood detected. This paper shows that after discounting the effects of the prevailing weather and other atmospheric conditions on the performance of horses and jockeys, the accuracy of probabilistic forecasts derived from betting odds are systematically affected by the same conditions. By correcting for misattribution of mood, this paper shows that significantly better forecasts can be derived from betting odds, and that these have substantial economic value. The principal conclusion from this paper is that when the purpose of a financial market is to derive accurate probabilistic estimates from final contract prices, forecast accuracy can be substantially improved by understanding and correcting for situations where markets systematically under-perform.

The third paper addresses the conflicting and inconclusive evidence of the existence of weather effects, via misattribution of mood, on market efficiency in naturalistic financial markets. A review on research on weather-induced misattribution of mood in naturalistic financial markets indicates that shortcomings in previous research may be the foundation to these conflicting and inconclusive results. This paper then proposes that investigating the influence of weather-induced misattribution of mood on the level of favourite-longshot bias (FLB) (a phenomenon whereby favourites/longshots are under-/over-bet) displayed in horserace betting markets addresses all shortcomings identified in previous research. The results show that under weather conditions when individuals are expected to experience good mood (cf. bad mood), they over-/underestimate the winning probabilities of longshot/favourite contestants at a greater extent, and that such effect inflict substantial economic cost on decision makers. Remarkably, these results remain significant when controlling for various factors known to influence the FLB, hence providing robust evidence to support the conclusions that weather-induced misattribution of mood can significantly affect decision making in a naturalistic financial market, and that (in horserace markets) it is weather conditions associated with good mood which damage decision quality. Importantly, the results of this paper suggest that decision anomalies may be innate to the human decision making process.

Text
Final PhD thesis Luis Felipe Costa Sperb - Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only until 31 January 2021.
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.

More information

Published date: January 2019

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 429610
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/429610
PURE UUID: e9691eb4-cf58-41df-b80a-61147ba9c345

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 01 Apr 2019 16:30
Last modified: 01 Apr 2019 16:30

Export record

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×