Adverse events in anaesthetic practice: qualitative study of definition, discussion and reporting
Adverse events in anaesthetic practice: qualitative study of definition, discussion and reporting
Background.
This study aimed to explore how critical and acceptable practice are defined in anaesthesia and how this influences the discussion and reporting of adverse incidents.
Method.
We conducted workplace observations of, and interviews with, anaesthetists and anaesthetic staff. Transcripts were analysed qualitatively for recurrent themes and quantitatively for adverse events in anaesthetic process witnessed. We also observed departmental audit meetings and analysed meeting minutes and report forms.
Results.
The educational value of discussing events was well-recognized; 28 events were discussed at departmental meetings, of which 5 (18%) were presented as ‘critical incidents’. However, only one incident was reported formally. Our observations of anaesthetic practice revealed 103 minor events during the course of over 50 anaesthetic procedures, but none were acknowledged as offering the potential to improve safety, although some were direct violations of ‘acceptable’ practice. Formal reporting appears to be constrained by changing boundaries of what might be considered ‘critical’, by concerns of loss of control over formally reported incidents and by the perception that reporting schemes outside anaesthesia have purposes other than education.
Conclusions.
Despite clear official definitions of criticality in anaesthesia, there is ambiguity in how these are applied in practice. Many educationally useful events fall outside critical incident reporting schemes. Professional expertise in anaesthesia brings its own implicit safety culture but the reluctance to adopt a more explicit ‘systems approach’ to adverse events may impede further gains in patient safety in anaesthesia.
anaesthetists, risks, complications, accidents, incident reporting, safety, patients
715-721
Smith, A.F.
628d52dc-ef76-40b6-9b86-7c809392878d
Goodwin, D.
44ea5b5f-3933-4171-83b6-8d48928e27ca
Mort, M.
0c5eea61-4f65-4520-92bd-7b4ead7e1247
Pope, C.
21ae1290-0838-4245-adcf-6f901a0d4607
2006
Smith, A.F.
628d52dc-ef76-40b6-9b86-7c809392878d
Goodwin, D.
44ea5b5f-3933-4171-83b6-8d48928e27ca
Mort, M.
0c5eea61-4f65-4520-92bd-7b4ead7e1247
Pope, C.
21ae1290-0838-4245-adcf-6f901a0d4607
Smith, A.F., Goodwin, D., Mort, M. and Pope, C.
(2006)
Adverse events in anaesthetic practice: qualitative study of definition, discussion and reporting.
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 96 (6), .
(doi:10.1093/bja/ael099).
Abstract
Background.
This study aimed to explore how critical and acceptable practice are defined in anaesthesia and how this influences the discussion and reporting of adverse incidents.
Method.
We conducted workplace observations of, and interviews with, anaesthetists and anaesthetic staff. Transcripts were analysed qualitatively for recurrent themes and quantitatively for adverse events in anaesthetic process witnessed. We also observed departmental audit meetings and analysed meeting minutes and report forms.
Results.
The educational value of discussing events was well-recognized; 28 events were discussed at departmental meetings, of which 5 (18%) were presented as ‘critical incidents’. However, only one incident was reported formally. Our observations of anaesthetic practice revealed 103 minor events during the course of over 50 anaesthetic procedures, but none were acknowledged as offering the potential to improve safety, although some were direct violations of ‘acceptable’ practice. Formal reporting appears to be constrained by changing boundaries of what might be considered ‘critical’, by concerns of loss of control over formally reported incidents and by the perception that reporting schemes outside anaesthesia have purposes other than education.
Conclusions.
Despite clear official definitions of criticality in anaesthesia, there is ambiguity in how these are applied in practice. Many educationally useful events fall outside critical incident reporting schemes. Professional expertise in anaesthesia brings its own implicit safety culture but the reluctance to adopt a more explicit ‘systems approach’ to adverse events may impede further gains in patient safety in anaesthesia.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 2006
Keywords:
anaesthetists, risks, complications, accidents, incident reporting, safety, patients
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 42981
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/42981
ISSN: 0007-0912
PURE UUID: db4622f8-bf7f-4a29-a63a-97ed16875d4e
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 05 Jan 2007
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 08:51
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
A.F. Smith
Author:
D. Goodwin
Author:
M. Mort
Author:
C. Pope
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics