The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Structural response and continuous strength method design of slender stainless steel cross-sections

Structural response and continuous strength method design of slender stainless steel cross-sections
Structural response and continuous strength method design of slender stainless steel cross-sections

In current structural stainless steel design codes, local buckling is accounted for through a cross-section classification framework, which is based on an elastic, perfectly-plastic material model, providing consistency with the corresponding treatment of carbon steel cross-sections. Hence, for non-slender cross-sections, the codified design stress is limited to the 0.2% proof stress without considering the pronounced strain hardening exhibited by stainless steels, while for slender cross-sections, the effective width method is employed without considering the beneficial effect of element interaction. Previous comparisons between test results and codified predictions have generally indicated over-conservatism and scatter. This has prompted the development of more efficient design rules, which can reflect better the actual local buckling behaviour and nonlinear material response of stainless steel cross-sections. A deformation-based design approach called the continuous strength method (CSM) has been proposed for the design of stocky cross-sections, which relates the strength of a cross-section to its deformation capacity and employs a bi-linear (elastic, linear hardening) material model to account for strain hardening. In this paper, the scope of the CSM is extended to cover the design of slender stainless steel cross-sections under compression, bending and combined loading, underpinned by and validated against 794 experimental and numerical results. The proposed approach allows for the beneficial effect of element interaction within the cross-section, and is shown to yield a higher level of accuracy and consistency, as well as design efficiency, in the capacity predictions of slender stainless steel cross-sections, compared to the effective width methods employed in the current international design standards. Non-doubly symmetric sections in bending, which may be slender, but still benefit from strain hardening, are also discussed. The reliability of the CSM proposal has been confirmed by means of statistical analyses according to EN 1990, demonstrating its suitability for incorporation into future revisions of international design codes for stainless steel structures.

Continuous strength method, Design standards, Numerical modelling, Reliability analysis, Slender cross-section, Stainless steel, Structural design
0141-0296
14-25
Zhao, Ou
7c6ee443-1c84-4f9e-bec6-86d376a619eb
Afshan, Sheida
68dcdcac-c2aa-4c09-951c-da4992e72086
Gardner, Leroy
46d0a594-dc76-46be-854c-4bc0363b386b
Zhao, Ou
7c6ee443-1c84-4f9e-bec6-86d376a619eb
Afshan, Sheida
68dcdcac-c2aa-4c09-951c-da4992e72086
Gardner, Leroy
46d0a594-dc76-46be-854c-4bc0363b386b

Zhao, Ou, Afshan, Sheida and Gardner, Leroy (2017) Structural response and continuous strength method design of slender stainless steel cross-sections. Engineering Structures, 140, 14-25. (doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.02.044).

Record type: Article

Abstract

In current structural stainless steel design codes, local buckling is accounted for through a cross-section classification framework, which is based on an elastic, perfectly-plastic material model, providing consistency with the corresponding treatment of carbon steel cross-sections. Hence, for non-slender cross-sections, the codified design stress is limited to the 0.2% proof stress without considering the pronounced strain hardening exhibited by stainless steels, while for slender cross-sections, the effective width method is employed without considering the beneficial effect of element interaction. Previous comparisons between test results and codified predictions have generally indicated over-conservatism and scatter. This has prompted the development of more efficient design rules, which can reflect better the actual local buckling behaviour and nonlinear material response of stainless steel cross-sections. A deformation-based design approach called the continuous strength method (CSM) has been proposed for the design of stocky cross-sections, which relates the strength of a cross-section to its deformation capacity and employs a bi-linear (elastic, linear hardening) material model to account for strain hardening. In this paper, the scope of the CSM is extended to cover the design of slender stainless steel cross-sections under compression, bending and combined loading, underpinned by and validated against 794 experimental and numerical results. The proposed approach allows for the beneficial effect of element interaction within the cross-section, and is shown to yield a higher level of accuracy and consistency, as well as design efficiency, in the capacity predictions of slender stainless steel cross-sections, compared to the effective width methods employed in the current international design standards. Non-doubly symmetric sections in bending, which may be slender, but still benefit from strain hardening, are also discussed. The reliability of the CSM proposal has been confirmed by means of statistical analyses according to EN 1990, demonstrating its suitability for incorporation into future revisions of international design codes for stainless steel structures.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 16 February 2017
e-pub ahead of print date: 8 March 2017
Published date: 1 June 2017
Keywords: Continuous strength method, Design standards, Numerical modelling, Reliability analysis, Slender cross-section, Stainless steel, Structural design

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 429867
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/429867
ISSN: 0141-0296
PURE UUID: fe5e1748-58f5-41c6-b3e0-3212f65cd817
ORCID for Sheida Afshan: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1048-2931

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 08 Apr 2019 16:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 04:40

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Ou Zhao
Author: Sheida Afshan ORCID iD
Author: Leroy Gardner

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×