Dataset for paper "Application of a wavenumber domain numerical method to the prediction of the radiation efficiency and sound transmission of complex extruded panels"

Dataset DOI: https://doi.org/10.5258/SOTON/D0872

Authors: Hyungjun Kim; Jungsoo Ryue; David J Thompson; Angela D. Müller
Journal: Journal of Sound and Vibration
Accepted: 28 Feb 2019
URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2019.02.036

Contact: David Thompson, email: djt@isvr.soton.ac.uk
Date paper submitted: 11 August 2017
Licenses or restrictions placed on the data: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
File "Figure_data.xlsx" contains all data contained in the graphs of the paper. 

Fig. 3. The damping loss factors for the top compound plate and the bottom purely aluminium plate.

Fig. 13. Comparison of (a) the average mean-squared velocity and (b) radiated sound power of the panel, predicted from the two different excitations in the frequency domain (integrated over the wavenumber).

Fig. 14. The predicted radiation efficiencies of extruded panel for the strip and stiffener excitations, with and without air-filled cavity.

Fig. 15. (a) The average mean-squared velocity and (b) radiated sound power of the panel with and without air-filled cavity against wavenumber at 1 kHz for the strip excitation.

Fig. 18. (a) Predicted STLs through the extruded panel for simply supported boundary conditions against frequency and wavenumber.

Fig. 23. Comparison of point mobilities obtained from numerical simulation and experiments at (a) S1 and S4, and (b) S2 and S3 on the bottom plate.

Fig. 24. Comparison of point mobilities obtained from numerical simulation and experiments at (a) S5 and S9, (b) S6 and S8, and (c) S7 and S10 on the top plate.

Fig. 26. Comparison of averaged mean-squared velocity obtained from numerical simulation and experiments for (a) strip excitations at P1 and P2 and (b) stiffener excitations at P3 and P4.

Fig. 27. Comparison of the vibration level difference between the top and bottom plates obtained from numerical simulation and experiments for (a) strip excitations at P1 and P2 and (b) stiffener excitations at P3 and P4.

Fig. 28. Comparison of radiation efficiencies obtained from numerical simulation and experiments for (a) strip excitations at P1 and P2 and (b) stiffener excitations at P3 and P4.

Fig. 30. Comparison of STLs obtained from the numerical simulation and experiments.

Format: Microsoft Excel

Readme created on 8/4/19 by Sue Brindle