This dataset reports data for the figures published in: "Reduction of aerodynamic noise from square bars by introducing spanwise waviness", Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2018.

Files in the zip folder are organised as follows:
 - Each file refers to a figure in the paper
 - Each line of the figure is reported as a two column matrix in the text file, x values and y values
 - Prior to each matrix three headers lines are displayed reporting labels and legend

File contained in the zipped folder are:
Figure 3(a). Comparison of mean surface quantities and wake statistics with existing experimental and LES result. (a) Mean pressure coefficient along the bar surface.txt
Figure 3(b). Comparison of mean surface quantities and wake statistics with existing experimental and LES result. (b) Mean streamwise velocity along the wake centreline.txt
Figure 3(c). Comparison of mean surface quantities and wake statistics with existing experimental and LES result. (c) RMS streamwise velocity along the wake centreline.txt
Figure 3(d). Comparison of mean surface quantities and wake statistics with existing experimental and LES result. (d) RMS cross-stream velocity along the wake centreline.txt
Figure 4(a). Comparison of mean surface quantities and wake statistics between different Reynolds numbers. (a) Mean pressure coefficient along the bar surface.txt
Figure 4(b). Comparison of mean surface quantities and wake statistics between different Reynolds numbers. (b) Mean streamwise velocity along the wake centreline.txt
Figure 4(c). Comparison of mean surface quantities and wake statistics between different Reynolds numbers. (c) RMS streamwise velocity along the wake centreline.txt
Figure 4(d). Comparison of mean surface quantities and wake statistics between different Reynolds numbers. (d) RMS cross-stream velocity along the wake centreline.txt
Figure 7(a). Comparisons of power spectral density of C_{D} between the straight bar and different wavy bars with lambda = 4D..txt
Figure 7(b). Comparisons of power spectral density of C_{L} between the straight bar and different wavy bars with lambda = 4D..txt
Figure 8(a). Comparisons of power spectral density of C_{L} between different spanwise domain lengths and different wavelengths at w = 0.24D.txt
Figure 8(b). Comparisons of power spectral density of C_{D} between different spanwise domain lengths and different wavelengths at w = 0.24D.txt
Figure 10(a). Comparisons of PSDs of C_{L} between lambda = 2D and 4D at w = 0.12D.txt
Figure 10(b). Comparisons of PSDs of C_{L} between lambda = 2D and 4D at w = 0.36D.txt
Figure 10(c). Comparisons of PSDs of C_{D} between lambda = 2D and 4D at w = 0.12D.txt
Figure 10(d). Comparisons of PSDs of C_{D} between lambda = 2D and 4D at w = 0.36D.txt
Figure 11(a). Variations of C_{D} with the wave amplitude.txt
Figure 11(b). Variations of St with the wave amplitude.txt
Figure 11(c). Variations of C_{L,rms} with the wave amplitude.txt
Figure 11(d). Variations of C_{D,rms} with the wave amplitude.txt
Figure 13(a). Computed far-field noise spectra at different receivers for lambda = 4D with different wave amplitudes. (a) theta = 90 in x-y plane.txt
Figure 13(b). Computed far-field noise spectra at different receivers for lambda = 4D with different wave amplitudes. (b) theta = 180 in x-y plane.txt
Figure 13(c). Computed far-field noise spectra at different receivers for lambda = 4D with different wave amplitudes. (c) alpha = 90 in x-z plane.txt
Figure 14. Variations of the OASPL and the tonal peak level with the wave amplitude at different receivers.txt
Figure 17(a). Narrow band measured PSDs at theta = 90 deg. (a) U = 30 ms.txt
Figure 17(b). Narrow band measured PSDs at theta = 90 deg. (b) U = 60 ms.txt
Figure 18(a) The dependence of the measured one-sixth band peak SPL on the flow speed.txt
Figure 18(b) The dependence of the measured OASPL on the flow speed.txt
Figure 19. Noise reduction levels, represented by delta SPL as a function of speed for different wavy cases..txt
Figure 20(a). Comparisons of far-field one-sixth octave band noise spectrum between measurements and simulations. (a) Straight..txt
Figure 20(b). Comparisons of far-field one-sixth octave band noise spectrum between measurements and simulations. (b) lambda = 2D and w = 0.36D.txt
Figure 20(c). Comparisons of far-field one-sixth octave band noise spectrum between measurements and simulations. (c) lambda = 4D and w = 0.48D.txt
Figure 21(a). Comparisons of far-field noise directivity between measurements and simulations. (a) straight.txt
Figure 21(b). Comparisons of far-field noise directivity between measurements and simulations. (b) lambda = 2D and w = 0.36D.txt
Figure 21(c). Comparisons of far-field noise directivity between measurements and simulations. (c) lambda = 4D and w = 0.48D.txt
Figure 26(a). Mean pressure coefficient distribution around the wavy bar surface at the peak (-) and the valley (-.) compared with the straight bar. (a) w = 0.12D.txt
Figure 26(b). Mean pressure coefficient distribution around the wavy bar surface at the peak (-) and the valley (-.) compared with the straight bar. (b) w = 0.24D.txt
Figure 26(c). Mean pressure coefficient distribution around the wavy bar surface at the peak (-) and the valley (-.) compared with the straight bar. (c) w = 0.36D.txt
Figure 26(d). Mean pressure coefficient distribution around the wavy bar surface at the peak (-) and the valley (-.) compared with the straight bar. (d) w = 0.48D.txt
