He says, she says: Ecosystem services and gender among indigenous communities in the Colombian Amazon
He says, she says: Ecosystem services and gender among indigenous communities in the Colombian Amazon
Although it has been hypothesized that men and women vary in the way they value ecosystem services, research on ecosystem services rarely incorporates a gender dimension. We conducted research with nine indigenous communities in the Colombian Amazon to understand which ecosystem services men and women perceive as most important for their wellbeing and to rank them according to locally-defined criteria of importance. Participants identified a total of 26 ecosystem services and 20 different ranking criteria. Ecosystem services such as land for agricultural fields (a supporting service), and provision of fish and medicinal plants were equally important for both men and women. Wild fruits and resources to make handicrafts were more frequently mentioned by women, whereas timber, materials for making tools and coca leaves were more frequently mentioned by men. There were also differences in the criteria used to value ecosystem services, with 11 criteria mentioned by both men and women, five mentioned exclusively by women and another four only by men. Our results suggest that taking gender differences into account in ecosystem services assessments may result in the prioritization of different services in conservation and sustainable development programs, and may lead to different outcomes for ecosystem service provision and local livelihoods.
Conservation, Participatory methods, Prioritization, Qualitative, Valuation, Wellbeing
Cruz-Garcia, Gisella S.
d4744b91-2026-49ea-85d5-41f2668dc04e
Vanegas Cubillos, Martha
8e1b072c-2bc5-4222-9bb8-1a652c9a5fce
Torres-Vitolas, Carlos
028f0e74-1e9a-43c6-ac5a-18972d245c93
Harvey, Celia A.
a5561fe0-b01d-4ff4-ab39-c64174e5d681
Shackleton, Charlie M.
4b728539-fb0e-4355-9ed6-4f2cf601ee2b
Schreckenberg, Kate
d3fa344b-bf0d-4358-b12a-5547968f8a77
Willcock, Simon
89d9767e-8076-4b21-be9d-a964f5cc85d7
Navarrete-Frías, Carolina
0352a337-e848-432a-bf85-3362c4b16293
Sachet, Erwan
c45883a5-fed4-4dfc-b634-334ee273a58f
1 June 2019
Cruz-Garcia, Gisella S.
d4744b91-2026-49ea-85d5-41f2668dc04e
Vanegas Cubillos, Martha
8e1b072c-2bc5-4222-9bb8-1a652c9a5fce
Torres-Vitolas, Carlos
028f0e74-1e9a-43c6-ac5a-18972d245c93
Harvey, Celia A.
a5561fe0-b01d-4ff4-ab39-c64174e5d681
Shackleton, Charlie M.
4b728539-fb0e-4355-9ed6-4f2cf601ee2b
Schreckenberg, Kate
d3fa344b-bf0d-4358-b12a-5547968f8a77
Willcock, Simon
89d9767e-8076-4b21-be9d-a964f5cc85d7
Navarrete-Frías, Carolina
0352a337-e848-432a-bf85-3362c4b16293
Sachet, Erwan
c45883a5-fed4-4dfc-b634-334ee273a58f
Cruz-Garcia, Gisella S., Vanegas Cubillos, Martha, Torres-Vitolas, Carlos, Harvey, Celia A., Shackleton, Charlie M., Schreckenberg, Kate, Willcock, Simon, Navarrete-Frías, Carolina and Sachet, Erwan
(2019)
He says, she says: Ecosystem services and gender among indigenous communities in the Colombian Amazon.
Ecosystem Services, 37, [100921].
(doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100921).
Abstract
Although it has been hypothesized that men and women vary in the way they value ecosystem services, research on ecosystem services rarely incorporates a gender dimension. We conducted research with nine indigenous communities in the Colombian Amazon to understand which ecosystem services men and women perceive as most important for their wellbeing and to rank them according to locally-defined criteria of importance. Participants identified a total of 26 ecosystem services and 20 different ranking criteria. Ecosystem services such as land for agricultural fields (a supporting service), and provision of fish and medicinal plants were equally important for both men and women. Wild fruits and resources to make handicrafts were more frequently mentioned by women, whereas timber, materials for making tools and coca leaves were more frequently mentioned by men. There were also differences in the criteria used to value ecosystem services, with 11 criteria mentioned by both men and women, five mentioned exclusively by women and another four only by men. Our results suggest that taking gender differences into account in ecosystem services assessments may result in the prioritization of different services in conservation and sustainable development programs, and may lead to different outcomes for ecosystem service provision and local livelihoods.
Text
1-s2.0-S221204161830250X-main
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 25 March 2019
e-pub ahead of print date: 5 April 2019
Published date: 1 June 2019
Keywords:
Conservation, Participatory methods, Prioritization, Qualitative, Valuation, Wellbeing
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 430446
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/430446
ISSN: 2212-0416
PURE UUID: f260efa8-1384-4c76-9113-dc6077292aaf
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 01 May 2019 16:30
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 12:24
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Gisella S. Cruz-Garcia
Author:
Martha Vanegas Cubillos
Author:
Carlos Torres-Vitolas
Author:
Celia A. Harvey
Author:
Charlie M. Shackleton
Author:
Kate Schreckenberg
Author:
Carolina Navarrete-Frías
Author:
Erwan Sachet
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics