The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Perceptions of food hypersensitivity expertise on social media: qualitative study

Perceptions of food hypersensitivity expertise on social media: qualitative study
Perceptions of food hypersensitivity expertise on social media: qualitative study
Background: seeking and sharing information are primary uses of the internet and social media. It is therefore vital to understand the processes individuals go through when engaging with information on these diverse platforms; especially in areas such as health and risk-related information. One important element of such engagement is evaluating and attributing expertise to others.

Objective: the study aimed to explore how meanings around expertise in relation to food allergy/intolerance (food hypersensitivity) were constructed by two groups of social media users; 1) those who use platforms for reasons relating to food hypersensitivity, and 2) those seen as experts by this community.

Methods: survey participants were asked open-ended questions to identify potential experts in FH issues on social media, and to discuss their reasoning for their choices (n = 143). Subsequently, 8 adult social media users with experience of managing food hypersensitivity, and 5 participants designated as experts by those users, took part in email interviews. Survey and interview data were analysed thematically using Braun and Clarke’s approach.

Results: judging expertise on social media is a complex and multi-faceted process. Users might be judged as expert through their professional background, or their experience living with food hypersensitivities. How users behave on social media, and the traces of their online activity can influence how others will see them. Such considerations are both measured and moderated through the social media community itself. Findings highlighted how social media often acts as a supportive information tool following a diagnosis, but this also raised concerns if patients cannot access suitable vetted information.
Conclusions: This work has implications for understanding how users perceive expertise on social media in relation to a health concern, and how information assessments are made during management of risks. Findings provide practical insights to both medical and organisational stakeholders involved in the support of those living with life-changing conditions, such as food hypersensitivities.

Hamshaw, R.J.
f1dc0cf6-0d5f-4ecb-ba67-fb1414cf726a
Barnett, Julie
e075f8d9-cf31-4bfc-a6be-41988b5ce764
Lucas, Jane
5cb3546c-87b2-4e59-af48-402076e25313
Hamshaw, R.J.
f1dc0cf6-0d5f-4ecb-ba67-fb1414cf726a
Barnett, Julie
e075f8d9-cf31-4bfc-a6be-41988b5ce764
Lucas, Jane
5cb3546c-87b2-4e59-af48-402076e25313

Hamshaw, R.J., Barnett, Julie and Lucas, Jane (2019) Perceptions of food hypersensitivity expertise on social media: qualitative study. Interactive Journal of Medical Research, [e10812]. (doi:10.2196/10812).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: seeking and sharing information are primary uses of the internet and social media. It is therefore vital to understand the processes individuals go through when engaging with information on these diverse platforms; especially in areas such as health and risk-related information. One important element of such engagement is evaluating and attributing expertise to others.

Objective: the study aimed to explore how meanings around expertise in relation to food allergy/intolerance (food hypersensitivity) were constructed by two groups of social media users; 1) those who use platforms for reasons relating to food hypersensitivity, and 2) those seen as experts by this community.

Methods: survey participants were asked open-ended questions to identify potential experts in FH issues on social media, and to discuss their reasoning for their choices (n = 143). Subsequently, 8 adult social media users with experience of managing food hypersensitivity, and 5 participants designated as experts by those users, took part in email interviews. Survey and interview data were analysed thematically using Braun and Clarke’s approach.

Results: judging expertise on social media is a complex and multi-faceted process. Users might be judged as expert through their professional background, or their experience living with food hypersensitivities. How users behave on social media, and the traces of their online activity can influence how others will see them. Such considerations are both measured and moderated through the social media community itself. Findings highlighted how social media often acts as a supportive information tool following a diagnosis, but this also raised concerns if patients cannot access suitable vetted information.
Conclusions: This work has implications for understanding how users perceive expertise on social media in relation to a health concern, and how information assessments are made during management of risks. Findings provide practical insights to both medical and organisational stakeholders involved in the support of those living with life-changing conditions, such as food hypersensitivities.

Text
Hamshaw_Barnett_Gavin_Lucas_2019_FINAL_ACCEPTED - Accepted Manuscript
Download (56kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 31 March 2019
e-pub ahead of print date: 28 June 2019

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 430510
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/430510
PURE UUID: 399aadb0-a9be-4934-8514-ec6f307f7d65
ORCID for Jane Lucas: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-8701-9975

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 02 May 2019 16:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 07:47

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: R.J. Hamshaw
Author: Julie Barnett
Author: Jane Lucas ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×