The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Population-level sexual mixing by HIV status and pre-exposure prophylaxis use among men who have sex with men in Montreal, Canada: implications for HIV prevention

Population-level sexual mixing by HIV status and pre-exposure prophylaxis use among men who have sex with men in Montreal, Canada: implications for HIV prevention
Population-level sexual mixing by HIV status and pre-exposure prophylaxis use among men who have sex with men in Montreal, Canada: implications for HIV prevention

Using cross-sectional survey data (Engage, 2017-2018) from 1,137 men who have sex with men, ≥16 years old, in Montreal, we compared observed human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) seroconcordance in previous-6-months' sexual partnerships with what would have been observed by chance if zero individuals serosorted. Of 5 recent partnerships where both individuals were HIV-negative, we compared observed concordance in preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use with the counterfactual if zero individuals selected partners based on PrEP use. We estimated the concordance by chance using a balancing-partnerships approach assuming proportionate mixing. HIV-positive respondents had a higher proportion of HIV-positive partners (66.4%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 64.0, 68.6) than by chance (23.9%, 95% CI: 23.1, 24.7). HIV-negative respondents (both on and not on PrEP) had higher proportions of HIV-negative partners (82.9% (95% CI: 81.1, 84.7) and 90.7% (95% CI: 89.6, 91.7), respectively) compared with by chance (76.1%, 95% CI: 75.3, 76.9); however, those on PrEP had a higher proportion of HIV-positive partners than those not on PrEP (17.1% (95% CI: 15.3, 18.9) vs. 9.3% (95% CI: 8.3, 10.4). Those on PrEP also had a higher proportion of partners on PrEP among their HIV-negative partners (50.6%, 95% CI: 42.5, 58.8) than by chance (28.5%, 95% CI: 27.5, 29.4). The relationship between PrEP and sexual-mixing patterns demonstrated by less population-level serosorting among those on PrEP and PrEP-matching warrants consideration during PrEP roll-out.

HIV, MSM, PrEP, PrEP-matching, serosorting, sexual mixing patterns
0002-9262
44-54
Wang, Linwei
31a50652-ac62-4bd4-aa01-7cc6537ea500
Moqueet, Nasheed
344ba75c-fad7-40d4-96bd-8c95dfae2fc8
Lambert, Gilles
d41972c3-b07c-4e94-87f5-151d8047d92d
Grace, Daniel
729b111b-9c24-41f0-a934-4366669f8dfd
Rodrigues, Ricky
d64cac5e-56ff-4a4f-8051-0e58a8115e95
Cox, Joseph
c47b00ff-6ea1-44bf-9e46-ebf5a8907f70
Lachowsky, Nathan J.
87634bac-759c-4e7b-9f16-22fb37e87cf6
Noor, Syed
bc469bf3-c3d7-499a-91f1-dc91f82c36cd
Armstrong, Heather
3dc9c223-1a61-47ad-ab0b-50d06cddf4f2
Tan, Darrell
27633611-3301-4bc3-9e65-8d202e019cbd
Burchell, Ann
e321a3c9-bad3-4417-858d-b6fc64044806
Ma, Huiting
94efc877-96dd-455f-976d-25ddea1ca073
Apelian, Herak
828aa7de-530b-4bd5-8205-838a9237cb58
Knight, Jesse
4e60e4ce-76b7-4c15-87e6-bdb621bb3ebd
Messier-Peet, Marc
6e50e534-29a6-4246-ab6d-e06cef404b92
Jollimore, Jody
61140450-bdfb-421f-96f5-5a62f7833332
Baral, Stefan
a40b2229-4d12-42dc-b0e8-8ead14ecd8eb
Hart, Trevor
49f351fd-ecb1-4fae-a272-93d1050e0aca
Moore, David M.
b3bb7f8f-4409-412e-959b-bcda959a8d2d
Mishra, Sharmistha
7276fda4-4b12-4ad5-b268-4893d106db3b
Wang, Linwei
31a50652-ac62-4bd4-aa01-7cc6537ea500
Moqueet, Nasheed
344ba75c-fad7-40d4-96bd-8c95dfae2fc8
Lambert, Gilles
d41972c3-b07c-4e94-87f5-151d8047d92d
Grace, Daniel
729b111b-9c24-41f0-a934-4366669f8dfd
Rodrigues, Ricky
d64cac5e-56ff-4a4f-8051-0e58a8115e95
Cox, Joseph
c47b00ff-6ea1-44bf-9e46-ebf5a8907f70
Lachowsky, Nathan J.
87634bac-759c-4e7b-9f16-22fb37e87cf6
Noor, Syed
bc469bf3-c3d7-499a-91f1-dc91f82c36cd
Armstrong, Heather
3dc9c223-1a61-47ad-ab0b-50d06cddf4f2
Tan, Darrell
27633611-3301-4bc3-9e65-8d202e019cbd
Burchell, Ann
e321a3c9-bad3-4417-858d-b6fc64044806
Ma, Huiting
94efc877-96dd-455f-976d-25ddea1ca073
Apelian, Herak
828aa7de-530b-4bd5-8205-838a9237cb58
Knight, Jesse
4e60e4ce-76b7-4c15-87e6-bdb621bb3ebd
Messier-Peet, Marc
6e50e534-29a6-4246-ab6d-e06cef404b92
Jollimore, Jody
61140450-bdfb-421f-96f5-5a62f7833332
Baral, Stefan
a40b2229-4d12-42dc-b0e8-8ead14ecd8eb
Hart, Trevor
49f351fd-ecb1-4fae-a272-93d1050e0aca
Moore, David M.
b3bb7f8f-4409-412e-959b-bcda959a8d2d
Mishra, Sharmistha
7276fda4-4b12-4ad5-b268-4893d106db3b

Wang, Linwei, Moqueet, Nasheed, Lambert, Gilles, Grace, Daniel, Rodrigues, Ricky, Cox, Joseph, Lachowsky, Nathan J., Noor, Syed, Armstrong, Heather, Tan, Darrell, Burchell, Ann, Ma, Huiting, Apelian, Herak, Knight, Jesse, Messier-Peet, Marc, Jollimore, Jody, Baral, Stefan, Hart, Trevor, Moore, David M. and Mishra, Sharmistha (2020) Population-level sexual mixing by HIV status and pre-exposure prophylaxis use among men who have sex with men in Montreal, Canada: implications for HIV prevention. American Journal of Epidemiology, 189 (1), 44-54. (doi:10.1093/aje/kwz231).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Using cross-sectional survey data (Engage, 2017-2018) from 1,137 men who have sex with men, ≥16 years old, in Montreal, we compared observed human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) seroconcordance in previous-6-months' sexual partnerships with what would have been observed by chance if zero individuals serosorted. Of 5 recent partnerships where both individuals were HIV-negative, we compared observed concordance in preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use with the counterfactual if zero individuals selected partners based on PrEP use. We estimated the concordance by chance using a balancing-partnerships approach assuming proportionate mixing. HIV-positive respondents had a higher proportion of HIV-positive partners (66.4%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 64.0, 68.6) than by chance (23.9%, 95% CI: 23.1, 24.7). HIV-negative respondents (both on and not on PrEP) had higher proportions of HIV-negative partners (82.9% (95% CI: 81.1, 84.7) and 90.7% (95% CI: 89.6, 91.7), respectively) compared with by chance (76.1%, 95% CI: 75.3, 76.9); however, those on PrEP had a higher proportion of HIV-positive partners than those not on PrEP (17.1% (95% CI: 15.3, 18.9) vs. 9.3% (95% CI: 8.3, 10.4). Those on PrEP also had a higher proportion of partners on PrEP among their HIV-negative partners (50.6%, 95% CI: 42.5, 58.8) than by chance (28.5%, 95% CI: 27.5, 29.4). The relationship between PrEP and sexual-mixing patterns demonstrated by less population-level serosorting among those on PrEP and PrEP-matching warrants consideration during PrEP roll-out.

Text
AJE-00480-2019.R2_Proof_hi - Accepted Manuscript
Download (406kB)

More information

Submitted date: 2019
Accepted/In Press date: 16 September 2019
e-pub ahead of print date: 15 October 2019
Published date: 31 January 2020
Additional Information: © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.
Keywords: HIV, MSM, PrEP, PrEP-matching, serosorting, sexual mixing patterns

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 430637
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/430637
ISSN: 0002-9262
PURE UUID: 0ddb13dd-9bd1-4033-9523-6bf424e5da21
ORCID for Heather Armstrong: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-1071-8644

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 07 May 2019 16:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 07:48

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Linwei Wang
Author: Nasheed Moqueet
Author: Gilles Lambert
Author: Daniel Grace
Author: Ricky Rodrigues
Author: Joseph Cox
Author: Nathan J. Lachowsky
Author: Syed Noor
Author: Darrell Tan
Author: Ann Burchell
Author: Huiting Ma
Author: Herak Apelian
Author: Jesse Knight
Author: Marc Messier-Peet
Author: Jody Jollimore
Author: Stefan Baral
Author: Trevor Hart
Author: David M. Moore
Author: Sharmistha Mishra

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×