The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Lay and health care professional understandings of self-management: a systematic review and narrative synthesis

Lay and health care professional understandings of self-management: a systematic review and narrative synthesis
Lay and health care professional understandings of self-management: a systematic review and narrative synthesis
Objectives:
Self-management is widely promoted but evidence of effectiveness is limited. Policy encourages health care professionals to support people with long-term conditions to learn self-management skills, yet little is known about the extent to which both parties share a common understanding of self-management. Thus, we compared health care professional and lay understandings of self-management of long-term conditions.

Methods:
Systematic review and narrative synthesis of qualitative studies identified from relevant electronic databases, hand-searching of references lists, citation tracking and recommendations by experts.

Results:
In total, 55 studies were included and quality was assessed using a brief quality assessment tool. Three conceptual themes, each with two subthemes were generated: traditional and shifting models of the professional–patient relationship (self-management as a tool to promote compliance; different expectations of responsibility); quality of relationship between health care professional and lay person (self-management as a collaborative partnership; self-management as tailored support) and putting self-management into everyday practice (the lived experience of self-management; self-management as a social practice).

Conclusion:
Self-management was conceptualised by health care professionals as incorporating both a biomedical model of compliance and individual responsibility. Lay people understood self-management in wider terms, reflecting biomedical, psychological and social domains and different expectations of responsibility. In different ways, both deviated from the dominant model of self-management underpinned by the concept of self-efficacy. Different understandings help to explain how self-management is practised and may help to account for limited evidence of effectiveness of self-management interventions.
2050-3121
1-18
Sadler, Euan
e5891abe-c97b-4e74-b9b3-6d7c43435360
Wolfe, Charles D.A.
c7a5302e-13af-46f3-82ec-be42b26bfeea
McKevitt, Christopher
4ff3bb8f-7931-4402-b68d-53aae1cd5570
Sadler, Euan
e5891abe-c97b-4e74-b9b3-6d7c43435360
Wolfe, Charles D.A.
c7a5302e-13af-46f3-82ec-be42b26bfeea
McKevitt, Christopher
4ff3bb8f-7931-4402-b68d-53aae1cd5570

Sadler, Euan, Wolfe, Charles D.A. and McKevitt, Christopher (2014) Lay and health care professional understandings of self-management: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. Sage Open Medicine, 2, 1-18. (doi:10.1177/2050312114544493).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objectives:
Self-management is widely promoted but evidence of effectiveness is limited. Policy encourages health care professionals to support people with long-term conditions to learn self-management skills, yet little is known about the extent to which both parties share a common understanding of self-management. Thus, we compared health care professional and lay understandings of self-management of long-term conditions.

Methods:
Systematic review and narrative synthesis of qualitative studies identified from relevant electronic databases, hand-searching of references lists, citation tracking and recommendations by experts.

Results:
In total, 55 studies were included and quality was assessed using a brief quality assessment tool. Three conceptual themes, each with two subthemes were generated: traditional and shifting models of the professional–patient relationship (self-management as a tool to promote compliance; different expectations of responsibility); quality of relationship between health care professional and lay person (self-management as a collaborative partnership; self-management as tailored support) and putting self-management into everyday practice (the lived experience of self-management; self-management as a social practice).

Conclusion:
Self-management was conceptualised by health care professionals as incorporating both a biomedical model of compliance and individual responsibility. Lay people understood self-management in wider terms, reflecting biomedical, psychological and social domains and different expectations of responsibility. In different ways, both deviated from the dominant model of self-management underpinned by the concept of self-efficacy. Different understandings help to explain how self-management is practised and may help to account for limited evidence of effectiveness of self-management interventions.

Text
2050312114544493 - Version of Record
Download (346kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 30 June 2014
e-pub ahead of print date: 28 August 2014
Published date: 2014

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 431074
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/431074
ISSN: 2050-3121
PURE UUID: 7d86f6b0-3a0f-4f03-852a-585b678ae9f1
ORCID for Euan Sadler: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3827-224X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 22 May 2019 16:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 04:40

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Euan Sadler ORCID iD
Author: Charles D.A. Wolfe
Author: Christopher McKevitt

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×