Lay and health care professional understandings of self-management: a systematic review and narrative synthesis
Lay and health care professional understandings of self-management: a systematic review and narrative synthesis
Objectives:
Self-management is widely promoted but evidence of effectiveness is limited. Policy encourages health care professionals to support people with long-term conditions to learn self-management skills, yet little is known about the extent to which both parties share a common understanding of self-management. Thus, we compared health care professional and lay understandings of self-management of long-term conditions.
Methods:
Systematic review and narrative synthesis of qualitative studies identified from relevant electronic databases, hand-searching of references lists, citation tracking and recommendations by experts.
Results:
In total, 55 studies were included and quality was assessed using a brief quality assessment tool. Three conceptual themes, each with two subthemes were generated: traditional and shifting models of the professional–patient relationship (self-management as a tool to promote compliance; different expectations of responsibility); quality of relationship between health care professional and lay person (self-management as a collaborative partnership; self-management as tailored support) and putting self-management into everyday practice (the lived experience of self-management; self-management as a social practice).
Conclusion:
Self-management was conceptualised by health care professionals as incorporating both a biomedical model of compliance and individual responsibility. Lay people understood self-management in wider terms, reflecting biomedical, psychological and social domains and different expectations of responsibility. In different ways, both deviated from the dominant model of self-management underpinned by the concept of self-efficacy. Different understandings help to explain how self-management is practised and may help to account for limited evidence of effectiveness of self-management interventions.
1-18
Sadler, Euan
e5891abe-c97b-4e74-b9b3-6d7c43435360
Wolfe, Charles D.A.
c7a5302e-13af-46f3-82ec-be42b26bfeea
McKevitt, Christopher
4ff3bb8f-7931-4402-b68d-53aae1cd5570
2014
Sadler, Euan
e5891abe-c97b-4e74-b9b3-6d7c43435360
Wolfe, Charles D.A.
c7a5302e-13af-46f3-82ec-be42b26bfeea
McKevitt, Christopher
4ff3bb8f-7931-4402-b68d-53aae1cd5570
Sadler, Euan, Wolfe, Charles D.A. and McKevitt, Christopher
(2014)
Lay and health care professional understandings of self-management: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.
Sage Open Medicine, 2, .
(doi:10.1177/2050312114544493).
Abstract
Objectives:
Self-management is widely promoted but evidence of effectiveness is limited. Policy encourages health care professionals to support people with long-term conditions to learn self-management skills, yet little is known about the extent to which both parties share a common understanding of self-management. Thus, we compared health care professional and lay understandings of self-management of long-term conditions.
Methods:
Systematic review and narrative synthesis of qualitative studies identified from relevant electronic databases, hand-searching of references lists, citation tracking and recommendations by experts.
Results:
In total, 55 studies were included and quality was assessed using a brief quality assessment tool. Three conceptual themes, each with two subthemes were generated: traditional and shifting models of the professional–patient relationship (self-management as a tool to promote compliance; different expectations of responsibility); quality of relationship between health care professional and lay person (self-management as a collaborative partnership; self-management as tailored support) and putting self-management into everyday practice (the lived experience of self-management; self-management as a social practice).
Conclusion:
Self-management was conceptualised by health care professionals as incorporating both a biomedical model of compliance and individual responsibility. Lay people understood self-management in wider terms, reflecting biomedical, psychological and social domains and different expectations of responsibility. In different ways, both deviated from the dominant model of self-management underpinned by the concept of self-efficacy. Different understandings help to explain how self-management is practised and may help to account for limited evidence of effectiveness of self-management interventions.
Text
2050312114544493
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 30 June 2014
e-pub ahead of print date: 28 August 2014
Published date: 2014
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 431074
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/431074
ISSN: 2050-3121
PURE UUID: 7d86f6b0-3a0f-4f03-852a-585b678ae9f1
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 22 May 2019 16:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 04:40
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Charles D.A. Wolfe
Author:
Christopher McKevitt
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics