The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Optimising translational research opportunities: a systematic review and narrative synthesis of basic and clinician scientists' perspectives of factors which enable or hinder translational research

Optimising translational research opportunities: a systematic review and narrative synthesis of basic and clinician scientists' perspectives of factors which enable or hinder translational research
Optimising translational research opportunities: a systematic review and narrative synthesis of basic and clinician scientists' perspectives of factors which enable or hinder translational research
Introduction
Translational research is central to international health policy, research and funding initiatives. Despite increasing use of the term, the translation of basic science discoveries into clinical practice is not straightforward. This systematic search and narrative synthesis aimed to examine factors enabling or hindering translational research from the perspective of basic and clinician scientists, a key stakeholder group in translational research, and to draw policy-relevant implications for organisations seeking to optimise translational research opportunities.

Methods and Results
We searched SCOPUS and Web of Science from inception until April 2015 for papers reporting scientists’ views of the factors they perceive as enabling or hindering the conduct of translational research. We screened 8,295 papers from electronic database searches and 20 papers from hand searches and citation tracking, identifying 26 studies of qualitative, quantitative or mixed method designs. We used a narrative synthesis approach and identified the following themes: 1) differing concepts of translational research 2) research processes as a barrier to translational research; 3) perceived cultural divide between research and clinical care; 4) interdisciplinary collaboration as enabling translation research, but dependent on the quality of prior and current social relationships; 5) translational research as entrepreneurial science. Across all five themes, factors enabling or hindering translational research were largely shaped by wider social, organisational, and structural factors.

Conclusion
To optimise translational research, policy could consider refining translational research models to better reflect scientists’ experiences, fostering greater collaboration and buy in from all types of scientists. Organisations could foster cultural change, ensuring that organisational practices and systems keep pace with the change in knowledge production brought about by the translational research agenda.
1932-6203
1-23
Fudge, Nina
84e67df3-8492-426b-8894-074a782b7709
Sadler, Euan
e5891abe-c97b-4e74-b9b3-6d7c43435360
Fisher, Helen R.
0120c9ec-635f-4c74-9619-200842a2a39e
Maher, John
602e8458-0944-45a1-b37c-45b4a319a8e0
Wolfe, Charles D. A.
1fbac47d-38aa-466c-8703-460021974878
Mckevitt, Christopher
4ff3bb8f-7931-4402-b68d-53aae1cd5570
Fudge, Nina
84e67df3-8492-426b-8894-074a782b7709
Sadler, Euan
e5891abe-c97b-4e74-b9b3-6d7c43435360
Fisher, Helen R.
0120c9ec-635f-4c74-9619-200842a2a39e
Maher, John
602e8458-0944-45a1-b37c-45b4a319a8e0
Wolfe, Charles D. A.
1fbac47d-38aa-466c-8703-460021974878
Mckevitt, Christopher
4ff3bb8f-7931-4402-b68d-53aae1cd5570

Fudge, Nina, Sadler, Euan, Fisher, Helen R., Maher, John, Wolfe, Charles D. A. and Mckevitt, Christopher (2016) Optimising translational research opportunities: a systematic review and narrative synthesis of basic and clinician scientists' perspectives of factors which enable or hinder translational research. PLoS ONE, 11 (8), 1-23, [e0160475]. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0160475).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Introduction
Translational research is central to international health policy, research and funding initiatives. Despite increasing use of the term, the translation of basic science discoveries into clinical practice is not straightforward. This systematic search and narrative synthesis aimed to examine factors enabling or hindering translational research from the perspective of basic and clinician scientists, a key stakeholder group in translational research, and to draw policy-relevant implications for organisations seeking to optimise translational research opportunities.

Methods and Results
We searched SCOPUS and Web of Science from inception until April 2015 for papers reporting scientists’ views of the factors they perceive as enabling or hindering the conduct of translational research. We screened 8,295 papers from electronic database searches and 20 papers from hand searches and citation tracking, identifying 26 studies of qualitative, quantitative or mixed method designs. We used a narrative synthesis approach and identified the following themes: 1) differing concepts of translational research 2) research processes as a barrier to translational research; 3) perceived cultural divide between research and clinical care; 4) interdisciplinary collaboration as enabling translation research, but dependent on the quality of prior and current social relationships; 5) translational research as entrepreneurial science. Across all five themes, factors enabling or hindering translational research were largely shaped by wider social, organisational, and structural factors.

Conclusion
To optimise translational research, policy could consider refining translational research models to better reflect scientists’ experiences, fostering greater collaboration and buy in from all types of scientists. Organisations could foster cultural change, ensuring that organisational practices and systems keep pace with the change in knowledge production brought about by the translational research agenda.

Other
journal.pone.0160475 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (838kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 20 July 2016
Published date: 4 August 2016

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 431352
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/431352
ISSN: 1932-6203
PURE UUID: e994383c-5b59-477a-8d07-27cea7e60c59
ORCID for Euan Sadler: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3827-224X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 29 May 2019 16:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 04:40

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Nina Fudge
Author: Euan Sadler ORCID iD
Author: Helen R. Fisher
Author: John Maher
Author: Charles D. A. Wolfe
Author: Christopher Mckevitt

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×