The contribution of implementation science to improving the design and evaluation of integrated care programmes for older people with frailty
The contribution of implementation science to improving the design and evaluation of integrated care programmes for older people with frailty
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to discuss three potential contributions from implementation science that can help clinicians and researchers to design and evaluate more effective integrated care programmes for older people with frailty.
Design/methodology/approach
This viewpoint paper focuses on three contributions: stakeholder engagement, using implementation science frameworks, and assessment of implementation strategies and outcomes.
Findings
Stakeholder engagement enhances the acceptability of interventions to recipients and providers and improves reach and sustainability. Implementation science frameworks assess provider, recipient and wider context factors enabling and hindering implementation, and guide selection and tailoring of appropriate implementation strategies. The assessment of implementation strategies and outcomes enables the evaluation of the effectiveness and implementation of integrated care programmes for this population.
Research limitations/implications
Implementation science provides a systematic way to think about why integrated care programmes for older people with frailty are not implemented successfully. The field has an evidence base, including how to tailor implementation science strategies to the local setting, and assess implementation outcomes to provide clinicians and researchers with an understanding of how their programme is working. The authors draw out implications for policy, practice and future research.
Originality/value
Different models to deliver integrated care to support older people with frailty exist, but it is not known which is most effective, for which individuals and in which clinical or psychosocial circumstances. Implementation science can play a valuable role in designing and evaluating more effective integrated care programmes for this population.
232-240
Sadler, Euan
e5891abe-c97b-4e74-b9b3-6d7c43435360
Sandall, Jane
12cd61c5-5f93-47df-82df-d383bcbf31a0
Sevdalis, Nick
0910262b-1085-41fa-931c-40b643912854
Wilson, Dan
935f4017-c1e2-4e2d-9367-d2d8df6df891
20 June 2019
Sadler, Euan
e5891abe-c97b-4e74-b9b3-6d7c43435360
Sandall, Jane
12cd61c5-5f93-47df-82df-d383bcbf31a0
Sevdalis, Nick
0910262b-1085-41fa-931c-40b643912854
Wilson, Dan
935f4017-c1e2-4e2d-9367-d2d8df6df891
Sadler, Euan, Sandall, Jane, Sevdalis, Nick and Wilson, Dan
(2019)
The contribution of implementation science to improving the design and evaluation of integrated care programmes for older people with frailty.
Journal of Integrated Care, 27 (3), .
(doi:10.1108/JICA-07-2018-0048).
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to discuss three potential contributions from implementation science that can help clinicians and researchers to design and evaluate more effective integrated care programmes for older people with frailty.
Design/methodology/approach
This viewpoint paper focuses on three contributions: stakeholder engagement, using implementation science frameworks, and assessment of implementation strategies and outcomes.
Findings
Stakeholder engagement enhances the acceptability of interventions to recipients and providers and improves reach and sustainability. Implementation science frameworks assess provider, recipient and wider context factors enabling and hindering implementation, and guide selection and tailoring of appropriate implementation strategies. The assessment of implementation strategies and outcomes enables the evaluation of the effectiveness and implementation of integrated care programmes for this population.
Research limitations/implications
Implementation science provides a systematic way to think about why integrated care programmes for older people with frailty are not implemented successfully. The field has an evidence base, including how to tailor implementation science strategies to the local setting, and assess implementation outcomes to provide clinicians and researchers with an understanding of how their programme is working. The authors draw out implications for policy, practice and future research.
Originality/value
Different models to deliver integrated care to support older people with frailty exist, but it is not known which is most effective, for which individuals and in which clinical or psychosocial circumstances. Implementation science can play a valuable role in designing and evaluating more effective integrated care programmes for this population.
Text
JICA-07-2018-0048
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 1 January 2019
e-pub ahead of print date: 20 June 2019
Published date: 20 June 2019
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 431355
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/431355
ISSN: 1476-9018
PURE UUID: 1c70f594-eed3-4b8f-84e4-a74135b0156d
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 29 May 2019 16:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 04:40
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Jane Sandall
Author:
Nick Sevdalis
Author:
Dan Wilson
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics