Minimal clinically important decline in physical function over one year: EPOSA study
Minimal clinically important decline in physical function over one year: EPOSA study
Background: The Australian/Canadian hand Osteoarthritis Index (AUSCAN) and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities knee and hip Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) are the most commonly used clinical tools to manage and monitor osteoarthritis (OA). Few studies have as yet reported longitudinal changes in the AUSCAN index regarding the hand. While there are published data regarding WOMAC assessments of the hip and the knee, the two sites have always evaluated separately. The current study therefore sought to determine the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in decline in the AUSCAN hand and WOMAC hip/knee physical function scores over 1 year using anchor-based and distribution-based methods. Methods: The study analysed data collected by the European Project on Osteoarthritis, a prospective observational study investigating six adult cohorts with and without OA by evaluating changes in the AUSCAN and WOMAC physical function scores at baseline and 12-18 months later. Pain and stiffness scores, the performance-based grip strength and walking speed and health-related quality of life measures were used as the study's anchors. Receiver operating characteristic curves and distribution-based methods were used to estimate the MCID in the AUSCAN and WOMAC physical function scores; only the data of those participants who possessed paired (baseline and follow up-measures) AUSCAN and WOMAC scores were included in the analysis. Results: Out of the 1866 participants who were evaluated, 1842 had paired AUSCAN scores and 1845 had paired WOMAC scores. The changes in the AUSCAN physical function score correlated significantly with those in the AUSCAN pain score (r = 0.31). Anchor- A nd distribution-based approaches converged identifying 4 as the MCID for decline in the AUSCAN hand physical function. Changes in the WOMAC hip/knee physical function score were significantly correlated with changes in both the WOMAC pain score (r = 0.47) and the WOMAC stiffness score (r = 0.35). The different approaches converged identifying two as the MCID for decline in the WOMAC hip/knee physical function. Conclusions: The most reliable MCID estimates of decline over 1 year in the AUSCAN hand and WOMAC hip/knee physical function scores were 4 and 2 points, respectively.
AUSCAN, Functional decline, Hand, Hip/knee, MCID, Osteoarthritis, WOMAC
Siviero, Paola
c04e65e4-ce3b-4e90-a9c5-8cf5d71c41e4
Limongi, Federica
1e97a365-9c0d-42e9-9435-6c02a13003f0
Gesmundo, Antonella
7cacaafd-5c5b-4720-809a-1cba3bf9f1d2
Zambon, Sabina
d866a206-bf2e-4651-b50e-06bc450a64a0
Cooper, Cyrus
e05f5612-b493-4273-9b71-9e0ce32bdad6
Dennison, Elaine M.
ee647287-edb4-4392-8361-e59fd505b1d1
Edwards, Mark H.
0b95b131-86cc-4ee7-b5fd-4694d9acbf0d
Timmermans, Erik J.
0ebf8273-3f05-4925-bb79-f7db1b55dd29
Van Der Pas, Suzan
eeed262d-8106-4a78-8439-826b2d99bc78
Schaap, Laura A.
b1b7ece4-8c4f-40af-b98a-9d21075fc6ce
Van Schoor, Natasja M.
3a59a196-b132-414f-81de-2ad3b21f7a74
Denkinger, Michael D.
f4e6f411-bc01-4cdd-ba76-eb951d43ad16
Herbolsheimer, Florian
effe311b-46fc-45de-9bb6-81ce209e59fc
Peter, Richard
50b02410-1695-4b00-9611-ebb33ac88cac
Castell, Maria Victoria
7d2663d6-552c-47b8-ae98-5c1f5fdb9380
Otero, Ángel
1ba9c0dd-0a42-4436-b713-b0a50e961cc4
Queipo, Rocio
c3438478-e21a-4d9f-9921-e3e002562053
Pedersen, Nancy L.
22ca166b-d76d-401c-be51-a81c86bc1f4a
Deeg, Dorly J.H.
e3d22d07-f66c-4582-bb4c-cdef30e97d6b
Maggi, Stefania
269c4058-6259-4392-a884-4fca4ffe5c68
17 May 2019
Siviero, Paola
c04e65e4-ce3b-4e90-a9c5-8cf5d71c41e4
Limongi, Federica
1e97a365-9c0d-42e9-9435-6c02a13003f0
Gesmundo, Antonella
7cacaafd-5c5b-4720-809a-1cba3bf9f1d2
Zambon, Sabina
d866a206-bf2e-4651-b50e-06bc450a64a0
Cooper, Cyrus
e05f5612-b493-4273-9b71-9e0ce32bdad6
Dennison, Elaine M.
ee647287-edb4-4392-8361-e59fd505b1d1
Edwards, Mark H.
0b95b131-86cc-4ee7-b5fd-4694d9acbf0d
Timmermans, Erik J.
0ebf8273-3f05-4925-bb79-f7db1b55dd29
Van Der Pas, Suzan
eeed262d-8106-4a78-8439-826b2d99bc78
Schaap, Laura A.
b1b7ece4-8c4f-40af-b98a-9d21075fc6ce
Van Schoor, Natasja M.
3a59a196-b132-414f-81de-2ad3b21f7a74
Denkinger, Michael D.
f4e6f411-bc01-4cdd-ba76-eb951d43ad16
Herbolsheimer, Florian
effe311b-46fc-45de-9bb6-81ce209e59fc
Peter, Richard
50b02410-1695-4b00-9611-ebb33ac88cac
Castell, Maria Victoria
7d2663d6-552c-47b8-ae98-5c1f5fdb9380
Otero, Ángel
1ba9c0dd-0a42-4436-b713-b0a50e961cc4
Queipo, Rocio
c3438478-e21a-4d9f-9921-e3e002562053
Pedersen, Nancy L.
22ca166b-d76d-401c-be51-a81c86bc1f4a
Deeg, Dorly J.H.
e3d22d07-f66c-4582-bb4c-cdef30e97d6b
Maggi, Stefania
269c4058-6259-4392-a884-4fca4ffe5c68
Siviero, Paola, Limongi, Federica, Gesmundo, Antonella, Zambon, Sabina, Cooper, Cyrus, Dennison, Elaine M., Edwards, Mark H., Timmermans, Erik J., Van Der Pas, Suzan, Schaap, Laura A., Van Schoor, Natasja M., Denkinger, Michael D., Herbolsheimer, Florian, Peter, Richard, Castell, Maria Victoria, Otero, Ángel, Queipo, Rocio, Pedersen, Nancy L., Deeg, Dorly J.H. and Maggi, Stefania
(2019)
Minimal clinically important decline in physical function over one year: EPOSA study.
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 20 (1), [227].
(doi:10.1186/s12891-019-2593-1).
Abstract
Background: The Australian/Canadian hand Osteoarthritis Index (AUSCAN) and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities knee and hip Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) are the most commonly used clinical tools to manage and monitor osteoarthritis (OA). Few studies have as yet reported longitudinal changes in the AUSCAN index regarding the hand. While there are published data regarding WOMAC assessments of the hip and the knee, the two sites have always evaluated separately. The current study therefore sought to determine the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in decline in the AUSCAN hand and WOMAC hip/knee physical function scores over 1 year using anchor-based and distribution-based methods. Methods: The study analysed data collected by the European Project on Osteoarthritis, a prospective observational study investigating six adult cohorts with and without OA by evaluating changes in the AUSCAN and WOMAC physical function scores at baseline and 12-18 months later. Pain and stiffness scores, the performance-based grip strength and walking speed and health-related quality of life measures were used as the study's anchors. Receiver operating characteristic curves and distribution-based methods were used to estimate the MCID in the AUSCAN and WOMAC physical function scores; only the data of those participants who possessed paired (baseline and follow up-measures) AUSCAN and WOMAC scores were included in the analysis. Results: Out of the 1866 participants who were evaluated, 1842 had paired AUSCAN scores and 1845 had paired WOMAC scores. The changes in the AUSCAN physical function score correlated significantly with those in the AUSCAN pain score (r = 0.31). Anchor- A nd distribution-based approaches converged identifying 4 as the MCID for decline in the AUSCAN hand physical function. Changes in the WOMAC hip/knee physical function score were significantly correlated with changes in both the WOMAC pain score (r = 0.47) and the WOMAC stiffness score (r = 0.35). The different approaches converged identifying two as the MCID for decline in the WOMAC hip/knee physical function. Conclusions: The most reliable MCID estimates of decline over 1 year in the AUSCAN hand and WOMAC hip/knee physical function scores were 4 and 2 points, respectively.
Text
s12891-019-2593-1
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 26 April 2019
Published date: 17 May 2019
Keywords:
AUSCAN, Functional decline, Hand, Hip/knee, MCID, Osteoarthritis, WOMAC
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 431364
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/431364
ISSN: 1471-2474
PURE UUID: bc0d6344-1d53-43f9-93eb-b790e0df4a20
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 30 May 2019 16:30
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 02:46
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Paola Siviero
Author:
Federica Limongi
Author:
Antonella Gesmundo
Author:
Sabina Zambon
Author:
Mark H. Edwards
Author:
Erik J. Timmermans
Author:
Suzan Van Der Pas
Author:
Laura A. Schaap
Author:
Natasja M. Van Schoor
Author:
Michael D. Denkinger
Author:
Florian Herbolsheimer
Author:
Richard Peter
Author:
Maria Victoria Castell
Author:
Ángel Otero
Author:
Rocio Queipo
Author:
Nancy L. Pedersen
Author:
Dorly J.H. Deeg
Author:
Stefania Maggi
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics