Safety of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors in osteoarthritis: Outcomes of a systematic review and meta-analysis
Safety of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors in osteoarthritis: Outcomes of a systematic review and meta-analysis
Objective: Our aim was to assess the safety of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors in the management of osteoarthritis (OA) in a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, placebo-controlled trials. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was undertaken in the databases MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Ovid CENTRAL) and Scopus. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trials that assessed adverse events (AEs) with COX-2 inhibitors in patients with OA were eligible for inclusion. Two authors appraised titles, abstracts and full-text papers for suitability and then assessed the studies for random sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding of participants and personnel, blinding of outcome assessment, incomplete outcome data and selective outcomes reporting. The primary outcomes of interest were gastrointestinal disorders, cardiac disorders, vascular disorders, nervous system disorders, skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders, hepatobiliary disorders, renal and urinary disorders, as well as overall severe and serious AEs, drug-related AEs and mortality. Secondary outcomes were withdrawals due to AEs (i.e. the number of participants who stopped the treatment due to an AE) and total number of AEs (i.e. the number of patients who experienced any AE at least once). Results: Database searches identified 2149 records from which, after exclusions, 40 trials were included in the meta-analysis. The use of COX-2 inhibitors in OA was associated with a significant increased risk of drug-related AEs compared with placebo (relative risk (RR) 1.26, 95% CI 1.09–1.46; I
2
= 24%). The risk of upper gastrointestinal complications (including dyspepsia, gastritis and heartburn) was significantly increased with COX-2 inhibitors versus placebo (RR 1.19, 95% CI 1.03–1.38; I
2
= 0%), particularly for abdominal pain, which increased by 40% with COX-2 inhibitors (RR 1.40, 95% CI 1.08–1.80; I
2
= 0%). The risk of hypertension increased by 45% overall (RR 1.45, 95% CI 1.01–2.10; I
2
= 25%); however, when rofecoxib was removed from the analysis the risk of hypertension in the COX-2 inhibitor group was no longer significant (RR 1.21, 95% CI 0.80–1.83; I
2
= 20%). The overall risk of heart failure and edema was increased by nearly 70% with COX-2 inhibitors versus placebo (RR 1.68, 95% CI 1.22–2.31; 0%) and this level of risk did not change appreciably when rofecoxib was excluded (RR 1.67, 95% CI 1.21–2.29; 0%). Conclusions: In our analysis, COX-2 inhibitors were associated with an increased risk of upper gastrointestinal AEs, especially abdominal pain. We also found an increased risk of cardiovascular AEs with COX-2 inhibitors, namely hypertension, heart failure and edema.
25-44
Curtis, Elizabeth
12aba0c3-1e9e-49ef-a7e9-3247e649cdd6
Fuggle, Nicholas
9ab0c81a-ac67-41c4-8860-23e0fdb1a900
Shaw, Sarah
9629b12a-8ee2-4483-a9ca-6efb4eef74c8
Spooner, Laura
08aef657-9836-41f1-b20c-40b7015adcad
Ntani, Georgia
9b009e0a-5ab2-4c6e-a9fd-15a601e92be5
Parsons, Camille
9730e5c3-0382-4ed7-8eaa-6932ab09ec15
Corp, Nadia
ff0a693c-bf1e-42f7-9352-bda4063bbb3d
Honvo, Germain
b028bd1a-b0a7-444f-bde5-32b5b611b9af
Baird, Janis
f4bf2039-6118-436f-ab69-df8b4d17f824
Maggi, Stefania
269c4058-6259-4392-a884-4fca4ffe5c68
Dennison, Elaine
ee647287-edb4-4392-8361-e59fd505b1d1
Bruyère, Olivier
ba727e54-ca17-4fa8-be3d-4729fb4b8c0d
Reginster, Jean Yves
08b05e27-73dd-4ce9-90e5-d64ec922147a
Cooper, Cyrus
e05f5612-b493-4273-9b71-9e0ce32bdad6
Curtis, Elizabeth
12aba0c3-1e9e-49ef-a7e9-3247e649cdd6
Fuggle, Nicholas
9ab0c81a-ac67-41c4-8860-23e0fdb1a900
Shaw, Sarah
9629b12a-8ee2-4483-a9ca-6efb4eef74c8
Spooner, Laura
08aef657-9836-41f1-b20c-40b7015adcad
Ntani, Georgia
9b009e0a-5ab2-4c6e-a9fd-15a601e92be5
Parsons, Camille
9730e5c3-0382-4ed7-8eaa-6932ab09ec15
Corp, Nadia
ff0a693c-bf1e-42f7-9352-bda4063bbb3d
Honvo, Germain
b028bd1a-b0a7-444f-bde5-32b5b611b9af
Baird, Janis
f4bf2039-6118-436f-ab69-df8b4d17f824
Maggi, Stefania
269c4058-6259-4392-a884-4fca4ffe5c68
Dennison, Elaine
ee647287-edb4-4392-8361-e59fd505b1d1
Bruyère, Olivier
ba727e54-ca17-4fa8-be3d-4729fb4b8c0d
Reginster, Jean Yves
08b05e27-73dd-4ce9-90e5-d64ec922147a
Cooper, Cyrus
e05f5612-b493-4273-9b71-9e0ce32bdad6
Curtis, Elizabeth, Fuggle, Nicholas, Shaw, Sarah, Spooner, Laura, Ntani, Georgia, Parsons, Camille, Corp, Nadia, Honvo, Germain, Baird, Janis, Maggi, Stefania, Dennison, Elaine, Bruyère, Olivier, Reginster, Jean Yves and Cooper, Cyrus
(2019)
Safety of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors in osteoarthritis: Outcomes of a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Drugs and Aging, 36, .
(doi:10.1007/s40266-019-00664-x).
Abstract
Objective: Our aim was to assess the safety of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors in the management of osteoarthritis (OA) in a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, placebo-controlled trials. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was undertaken in the databases MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Ovid CENTRAL) and Scopus. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trials that assessed adverse events (AEs) with COX-2 inhibitors in patients with OA were eligible for inclusion. Two authors appraised titles, abstracts and full-text papers for suitability and then assessed the studies for random sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding of participants and personnel, blinding of outcome assessment, incomplete outcome data and selective outcomes reporting. The primary outcomes of interest were gastrointestinal disorders, cardiac disorders, vascular disorders, nervous system disorders, skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders, hepatobiliary disorders, renal and urinary disorders, as well as overall severe and serious AEs, drug-related AEs and mortality. Secondary outcomes were withdrawals due to AEs (i.e. the number of participants who stopped the treatment due to an AE) and total number of AEs (i.e. the number of patients who experienced any AE at least once). Results: Database searches identified 2149 records from which, after exclusions, 40 trials were included in the meta-analysis. The use of COX-2 inhibitors in OA was associated with a significant increased risk of drug-related AEs compared with placebo (relative risk (RR) 1.26, 95% CI 1.09–1.46; I
2
= 24%). The risk of upper gastrointestinal complications (including dyspepsia, gastritis and heartburn) was significantly increased with COX-2 inhibitors versus placebo (RR 1.19, 95% CI 1.03–1.38; I
2
= 0%), particularly for abdominal pain, which increased by 40% with COX-2 inhibitors (RR 1.40, 95% CI 1.08–1.80; I
2
= 0%). The risk of hypertension increased by 45% overall (RR 1.45, 95% CI 1.01–2.10; I
2
= 25%); however, when rofecoxib was removed from the analysis the risk of hypertension in the COX-2 inhibitor group was no longer significant (RR 1.21, 95% CI 0.80–1.83; I
2
= 20%). The overall risk of heart failure and edema was increased by nearly 70% with COX-2 inhibitors versus placebo (RR 1.68, 95% CI 1.22–2.31; 0%) and this level of risk did not change appreciably when rofecoxib was excluded (RR 1.67, 95% CI 1.21–2.29; 0%). Conclusions: In our analysis, COX-2 inhibitors were associated with an increased risk of upper gastrointestinal AEs, especially abdominal pain. We also found an increased risk of cardiovascular AEs with COX-2 inhibitors, namely hypertension, heart failure and edema.
Text
Curtis2019_Article_SafetyOfCyclooxygenase-2Inhibi
- Version of Record
More information
e-pub ahead of print date: 9 May 2019
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 431435
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/431435
ISSN: 1170-229X
PURE UUID: 4127241b-9710-46f5-801c-a85d648b164b
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 03 Jun 2019 16:30
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 03:49
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Laura Spooner
Author:
Camille Parsons
Author:
Nadia Corp
Author:
Germain Honvo
Author:
Stefania Maggi
Author:
Olivier Bruyère
Author:
Jean Yves Reginster
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics