Beyond stimulants: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials assessing novel compounds for ADHD

Abstract

Introduction: despite stimulants being highly efficacious in short-term randomised controlled trials (RCTs), not all patients respond or can successfully tolerate them. A number of novel non-stimulant options are currently in the pipeline for the treatment of ADHD.

Areas covered: the authors conducted a systematic review of RCTs registered in ClinicalTrials.gov in the past five years (January 2014 and February 2019), supplemented by searches in PubMed, Web of Science, and drug manufacturers websites to find recent RCTs on novel non-stimulant ADHD medications.

Expert opinion: the authors found 28 pertinent RCTs of compounds acting on a variety of biological targets, including Dasotraline, Viloxazine (SPN-812), Centanafadine SR (CTN SR), OPC-64005, Fasoracetam (NFC-1, AEVI-001), Metadoxine (MDX), Vortioxetine, Tipepidine Hibenzate, Oxytocin, Sativex (delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) plus cannabidiol), Mazindol, and Molindone hydrochloride (SPN-810). Given the high effect size found in RCTs of stimulants in terms of efficacy on ADHD core symptoms, it is unlikely that these novel agents will show better efficacy than stimulants, at the group level. However, they may offer comparable or better tolerability. Additionally, agents acting on etiopathophysiological targets disrupted in specific subgroups of patients with ADHD will move forward the pharmacotherapy of ADHD from a “one size fits all” to a “precision medicine” approach.

More information

Identifiers

ORCID for Samuele Cortese: orcid.org/0000-0001-5877-8075

Catalogue record

Export record

Altmetrics