Horizontal crank position affects economy and upper limb kinematics of recumbent handcyclists
Horizontal crank position affects economy and upper limb kinematics of recumbent handcyclists
Purpose: To determine the effects of horizontal crank position on economy and upper limb kinematics in recumbent handcycling.
Methods: Fifteen trained handcyclists performed trials at 50% and 70% of their peak aerobic power output (POPeak), determined during a maximal ramp test, in each horizontal crank position. Four horizontal crank positions, 94%, 97%, 100% and 103% of arm length, were investigated. Horizontal crank positions were defined as the distance between the acromion angle to the centre of the handgrip, while the crank arm was parallel to the floor and pointing away from the participant. Economy and upper limb kinematics were calculated during the final minute of each three-minute trial.
Results:Horizontal crank position significantly affected handcycling economy at 70% POPeak (P < 0.01) but not at 50% POPeak (P = 0.44). The 97% horizontal crank position (16.0 (1.5) mL·min-1·W-1) was significantly more economical than the 94% (16.7 (1.9) mL·min-1·W-1) (P = 0.04) and 103% (16.6 (1.7) mL·min-1·W-1) (P < 0.01) positions. The 100 % horizontal crank position (16.2 (1.7) mL·min-1·W-1) was significantly more economical than the 103% position (P <0.01). Statistical parametric mapping indicated that an increase in horizontal crank position, from 94% to 103%, caused a significant increase in elbow extension, shoulder flexion, adduction, internal rotation, scapular internal rotation, wrist flexion, clavicle depression and clavicle protraction between 0 – 50 % (0° - 180°) of the cycle (P < 0.05).
Conclusion:Positioning the cranks at 97% to 100% of the athletes’ arm length improved handcycling economy at 70% POPeak as, potentially, the musculature surrounding the joints of the upper limb were in a more favourable position to produce force economically.
2265-2273
Stone, Benjamin
a1ab8971-003b-4a1e-b01c-73355d1bb807
Mason, Barry S.
79692bb5-b2d3-4ab3-a684-5cd222fda111
Warner, Martin B.
f4dce73d-fb87-4f71-a3f0-078123aa040c
Goosey-Tolfrey, Vicky L.
047de762-5613-4c5b-96bf-28e521b8f6aa
November 2019
Stone, Benjamin
a1ab8971-003b-4a1e-b01c-73355d1bb807
Mason, Barry S.
79692bb5-b2d3-4ab3-a684-5cd222fda111
Warner, Martin B.
f4dce73d-fb87-4f71-a3f0-078123aa040c
Goosey-Tolfrey, Vicky L.
047de762-5613-4c5b-96bf-28e521b8f6aa
Stone, Benjamin, Mason, Barry S., Warner, Martin B. and Goosey-Tolfrey, Vicky L.
(2019)
Horizontal crank position affects economy and upper limb kinematics of recumbent handcyclists.
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 51 (11), .
(doi:10.1249/MSS.0000000000002062).
Abstract
Purpose: To determine the effects of horizontal crank position on economy and upper limb kinematics in recumbent handcycling.
Methods: Fifteen trained handcyclists performed trials at 50% and 70% of their peak aerobic power output (POPeak), determined during a maximal ramp test, in each horizontal crank position. Four horizontal crank positions, 94%, 97%, 100% and 103% of arm length, were investigated. Horizontal crank positions were defined as the distance between the acromion angle to the centre of the handgrip, while the crank arm was parallel to the floor and pointing away from the participant. Economy and upper limb kinematics were calculated during the final minute of each three-minute trial.
Results:Horizontal crank position significantly affected handcycling economy at 70% POPeak (P < 0.01) but not at 50% POPeak (P = 0.44). The 97% horizontal crank position (16.0 (1.5) mL·min-1·W-1) was significantly more economical than the 94% (16.7 (1.9) mL·min-1·W-1) (P = 0.04) and 103% (16.6 (1.7) mL·min-1·W-1) (P < 0.01) positions. The 100 % horizontal crank position (16.2 (1.7) mL·min-1·W-1) was significantly more economical than the 103% position (P <0.01). Statistical parametric mapping indicated that an increase in horizontal crank position, from 94% to 103%, caused a significant increase in elbow extension, shoulder flexion, adduction, internal rotation, scapular internal rotation, wrist flexion, clavicle depression and clavicle protraction between 0 – 50 % (0° - 180°) of the cycle (P < 0.05).
Conclusion:Positioning the cranks at 97% to 100% of the athletes’ arm length improved handcycling economy at 70% POPeak as, potentially, the musculature surrounding the joints of the upper limb were in a more favourable position to produce force economically.
Text
Horizontal crank position affects economy and upper limb kinematics of recumbent handcyclists
- Accepted Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 3 June 2019
e-pub ahead of print date: 7 June 2019
Published date: November 2019
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 431907
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/431907
ISSN: 0195-9131
PURE UUID: 30a5b432-f6b8-49f9-aeef-18eff3f1925d
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 21 Jun 2019 16:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 03:40
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Benjamin Stone
Author:
Barry S. Mason
Author:
Vicky L. Goosey-Tolfrey
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics