“Going through the motions of weaving”: Wittgenstein on a characteristic syndrome of modern philosophical thought
“Going through the motions of weaving”: Wittgenstein on a characteristic syndrome of modern philosophical thought
The principal thesis for which I will argue is that: not only is Wittgenstein, as is too often thought, not putting forth some naturalistic explanation, or scientific theory of meaning, language or of intentional mental concepts. He wishes to persuade us of something much stronger: not only is he not trying to offer any such explanation in the face of philosophical problems of meaning and mind, but Wittgenstein’s claim is that the desire for explanation in regard to understanding linguistic and mental concepts is itself the problem. In order to defend this thesis, however, there are three principal impediments which, I believe, serve to stand in the way of our being able to grasp the import of Wittgenstein’s arguments, and I aim to clear these impediments away. The first is that the huge influence of Saul Kripke’s celebrated reading is both a blessing and a curse for understanding the import of Wittgenstein’s discussion. The second impediment which I attempt to clear away, is a characteristic tendency to receive Wittgenstein’s insights within the very explanatory framework of thought which he is trying to train us out of; and hence not to receive Wittgenstein’s insights at all. The third impediment is that, whilst John McDowell has grasped the import of Wittgenstein’s insights into the desire for explanation of linguistic and mental concepts, his understanding of these insights remains obscured from the view of the vast majority of published commentators, who are distracted by an early published paper by McDowell which betrays a form of the very misunderstanding Wittgenstein is trying to warn us against. What has gone unremarked is that McDowell later explicitly repudiates his early reading, once he has grasped the import of Wittgenstein’s discussion. By clearing these impediments away, my hope is that Wittgenstein’s profound insights can be made more widely available to contemporary thought.
University of Southampton
Jeffs, Kristen
462193aa-5836-469f-8b14-99fcc8a38e88
February 2018
Jeffs, Kristen
462193aa-5836-469f-8b14-99fcc8a38e88
Schönbaumsfeld, Genia
586652b5-20da-47cf-9719-4fc587dfa4e8
Woollard, Fiona
c3caccc2-68c9-47c8-b2d3-9735d09f1679
Jeffs, Kristen
(2018)
“Going through the motions of weaving”: Wittgenstein on a characteristic syndrome of modern philosophical thought.
University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis, 251pp.
Record type:
Thesis
(Doctoral)
Abstract
The principal thesis for which I will argue is that: not only is Wittgenstein, as is too often thought, not putting forth some naturalistic explanation, or scientific theory of meaning, language or of intentional mental concepts. He wishes to persuade us of something much stronger: not only is he not trying to offer any such explanation in the face of philosophical problems of meaning and mind, but Wittgenstein’s claim is that the desire for explanation in regard to understanding linguistic and mental concepts is itself the problem. In order to defend this thesis, however, there are three principal impediments which, I believe, serve to stand in the way of our being able to grasp the import of Wittgenstein’s arguments, and I aim to clear these impediments away. The first is that the huge influence of Saul Kripke’s celebrated reading is both a blessing and a curse for understanding the import of Wittgenstein’s discussion. The second impediment which I attempt to clear away, is a characteristic tendency to receive Wittgenstein’s insights within the very explanatory framework of thought which he is trying to train us out of; and hence not to receive Wittgenstein’s insights at all. The third impediment is that, whilst John McDowell has grasped the import of Wittgenstein’s insights into the desire for explanation of linguistic and mental concepts, his understanding of these insights remains obscured from the view of the vast majority of published commentators, who are distracted by an early published paper by McDowell which betrays a form of the very misunderstanding Wittgenstein is trying to warn us against. What has gone unremarked is that McDowell later explicitly repudiates his early reading, once he has grasped the import of Wittgenstein’s discussion. By clearing these impediments away, my hope is that Wittgenstein’s profound insights can be made more widely available to contemporary thought.
Text
e-Thesis - K Jeffs
- Version of Record
More information
Published date: February 2018
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 432080
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/432080
PURE UUID: 69d01afb-cc6c-48c9-af13-7257bff22314
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 01 Jul 2019 16:30
Last modified: 12 Dec 2021 05:31
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Kristen Jeffs
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics