On the impact of Citizen Science-derived data quality on deep learning based classification in marine images
On the impact of Citizen Science-derived data quality on deep learning based classification in marine images
The evaluation of large amounts of digital image data is of growing importance for biology, including for the exploration and monitoring of marine habitats. However, only a tiny percentage of the image data collected is evaluated by marine biologists who manually interpret and annotate the image contents, which can be slow and laborious. In order to overcome the bottleneck in image annotation, two strategies are increasingly proposed: “citizen science” and “machine learning”. In this study, we investigated how the combination of citizen science, to detect objects, and machine learning, to classify megafauna, could be used to automate annotation of underwater images. For this purpose, multiple large data sets of citizen science annotations with different degrees of common errors and inaccuracies observed in citizen science data were simulated by modifying “gold standard” annotations done by an experienced marine biologist. The parameters of the simulation were determined on the basis of two citizen science experiments. It allowed us to analyze the relationship between the outcome of a citizen science study and the quality of the classifications of a deep learning megafauna classifier. The results show great potential for combining citizen science with machine learning, provided that the participants are informed precisely about the annotation protocol. Inaccuracies in the position of the annotation had the most substantial influence on the classification accuracy, whereas the size of the marking and false positive detections had a smaller influence.
1-16
Langenkämper, Daniel
101fc0f4-902e-4040-a351-5d4069ea4e78
Simon-Lledó, Erik
80f67b3a-44e7-466e-aed5-06b0ba788ca2
Hosking, Brett
f0b38c0e-2ae2-4cab-8e10-e05696dd505d
Jones, Daniel O.B.
44fc07b3-5fb7-4bf5-9cec-78c78022613a
Nattkemper, Tim W.
a6f7cd11-5871-4aa9-b781-049a392de4a6
12 June 2019
Langenkämper, Daniel
101fc0f4-902e-4040-a351-5d4069ea4e78
Simon-Lledó, Erik
80f67b3a-44e7-466e-aed5-06b0ba788ca2
Hosking, Brett
f0b38c0e-2ae2-4cab-8e10-e05696dd505d
Jones, Daniel O.B.
44fc07b3-5fb7-4bf5-9cec-78c78022613a
Nattkemper, Tim W.
a6f7cd11-5871-4aa9-b781-049a392de4a6
Langenkämper, Daniel, Simon-Lledó, Erik, Hosking, Brett, Jones, Daniel O.B. and Nattkemper, Tim W.
(2019)
On the impact of Citizen Science-derived data quality on deep learning based classification in marine images.
PLoS ONE, 14 (6), , [e0218086].
(doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0218086).
Abstract
The evaluation of large amounts of digital image data is of growing importance for biology, including for the exploration and monitoring of marine habitats. However, only a tiny percentage of the image data collected is evaluated by marine biologists who manually interpret and annotate the image contents, which can be slow and laborious. In order to overcome the bottleneck in image annotation, two strategies are increasingly proposed: “citizen science” and “machine learning”. In this study, we investigated how the combination of citizen science, to detect objects, and machine learning, to classify megafauna, could be used to automate annotation of underwater images. For this purpose, multiple large data sets of citizen science annotations with different degrees of common errors and inaccuracies observed in citizen science data were simulated by modifying “gold standard” annotations done by an experienced marine biologist. The parameters of the simulation were determined on the basis of two citizen science experiments. It allowed us to analyze the relationship between the outcome of a citizen science study and the quality of the classifications of a deep learning megafauna classifier. The results show great potential for combining citizen science with machine learning, provided that the participants are informed precisely about the annotation protocol. Inaccuracies in the position of the annotation had the most substantial influence on the classification accuracy, whereas the size of the marking and false positive detections had a smaller influence.
Text
journal.pone.0218086
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 25 May 2019
Published date: 12 June 2019
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 432095
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/432095
ISSN: 1932-6203
PURE UUID: 2ca62425-cb15-4cbc-a104-a8eb7305a8c2
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 02 Jul 2019 16:30
Last modified: 05 Jun 2024 18:25
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Daniel Langenkämper
Author:
Erik Simon-Lledó
Author:
Brett Hosking
Author:
Daniel O.B. Jones
Author:
Tim W. Nattkemper
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics