The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Bone remodelling inside a cemented resurfaced femoral head

Bone remodelling inside a cemented resurfaced femoral head
Bone remodelling inside a cemented resurfaced femoral head
Background. Although the short-term performance of modern resurfacing hip arthroplasty is impressive, the long-term performanceis still unknown. It is hypothesised that bone remodelling and the resulting changes in stress/strain distribution within the resurfaced femur influence the risk of fixation failure.
Method. Three-dimensional finite element models and adaptive bone remodelling algorithms have been used to predict long-term changes in bone density following cemented femoral head resurfacing. Applied loading conditions include normal walking and stair climbing. The remodelling simulation was validated by comparing the results of an analysis of a proximal femur implanted with a Charnley femoral component with known clinical data in terms of bone density adaptations.
Findings. Resurfacing caused a reduction of strain of 20–70% in the bone underlying the implant as compared to the intact femur, immediately post operative. Elevated strains, ranging between 0.50 and 0.80% strain, were generated post-operatively around the proximal femoral neck regions, indicating a potential risk of neck fracture. However, this strain concentration was considerably reduced after bone remodelling. After remodelling, bone resorption of 60–90% was observed in the bone underlying the implant. Reduction in bone density of 5–47% occurred in the lateral femoral head. Bone apposition was observed in the proximal–medial cortex, around the inferior edge of the implant. Hardly any changes in bone density occurred in the distal neck or the femoral diaphysis.
Interpretation. Although resurfacing has produced encouraging clinical results, bone remodelling within the femoral head might be a concern for long-term fixation. Regions of strain concentration at the head–neck junction, which may increase the initial risk of femoral neck fracture, are reduced with bone remodelling. In order to reduce this risk of femoral neck fracture, patients should avoid activities which induce high loading of the hip during the early rehabilitation period after surgery.
0268-0033
594-602
Gupta, S.
32658b41-cb78-4f2d-8848-f4b2e92e4fc5
New, A.M.R.
d2fbaf80-3abd-4bc5-ae36-9c77dfdde0d6
Taylor, M.
e368bda3-6ca5-4178-80e9-41a689badeeb
Gupta, S.
32658b41-cb78-4f2d-8848-f4b2e92e4fc5
New, A.M.R.
d2fbaf80-3abd-4bc5-ae36-9c77dfdde0d6
Taylor, M.
e368bda3-6ca5-4178-80e9-41a689badeeb

Gupta, S., New, A.M.R. and Taylor, M. (2006) Bone remodelling inside a cemented resurfaced femoral head. Clinical Biomechanics, 21 (6), 594-602. (doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2006.01.010).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background. Although the short-term performance of modern resurfacing hip arthroplasty is impressive, the long-term performanceis still unknown. It is hypothesised that bone remodelling and the resulting changes in stress/strain distribution within the resurfaced femur influence the risk of fixation failure.
Method. Three-dimensional finite element models and adaptive bone remodelling algorithms have been used to predict long-term changes in bone density following cemented femoral head resurfacing. Applied loading conditions include normal walking and stair climbing. The remodelling simulation was validated by comparing the results of an analysis of a proximal femur implanted with a Charnley femoral component with known clinical data in terms of bone density adaptations.
Findings. Resurfacing caused a reduction of strain of 20–70% in the bone underlying the implant as compared to the intact femur, immediately post operative. Elevated strains, ranging between 0.50 and 0.80% strain, were generated post-operatively around the proximal femoral neck regions, indicating a potential risk of neck fracture. However, this strain concentration was considerably reduced after bone remodelling. After remodelling, bone resorption of 60–90% was observed in the bone underlying the implant. Reduction in bone density of 5–47% occurred in the lateral femoral head. Bone apposition was observed in the proximal–medial cortex, around the inferior edge of the implant. Hardly any changes in bone density occurred in the distal neck or the femoral diaphysis.
Interpretation. Although resurfacing has produced encouraging clinical results, bone remodelling within the femoral head might be a concern for long-term fixation. Regions of strain concentration at the head–neck junction, which may increase the initial risk of femoral neck fracture, are reduced with bone remodelling. In order to reduce this risk of femoral neck fracture, patients should avoid activities which induce high loading of the hip during the early rehabilitation period after surgery.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2006

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 43214
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/43214
ISSN: 0268-0033
PURE UUID: c7decee3-5a9d-401c-be32-910ee75484eb

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 17 Jan 2007
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 08:53

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: S. Gupta
Author: A.M.R. New
Author: M. Taylor

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×