The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Protocol for developing quality assurance measures to use in surgical trials: an example from the ROMIO study

Protocol for developing quality assurance measures to use in surgical trials: an example from the ROMIO study
Protocol for developing quality assurance measures to use in surgical trials: an example from the ROMIO study
Introduction: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in surgery are frequently criticised because surgeon expertise and standards of surgery are not considered or accounted for during study design. This is particularly true in pragmatic trials (which typically involve multiple centres and surgeons and are based in 'real world' settings), compared with explanatory trials (which are smaller and more tightly controlled).
Objective: This protocol describes a process to develop and test quality assurance (QA) measures for use within a predominantly pragmatic surgical RCT comparing minimally invasive and open techniques for oesophageal cancer (the NIHR ROMIO study). It builds on methods initiated in the ROMIO pilot RCT.
Methodsamd analysis: We have identified three distinct types of QA measure: (i) entry criteria for surgeons, through assessment of operative videos, (ii) standardisation of operative techniques (by establishing minimum key procedural phases) and (iii) monitoring of surgeons during the trial, using intraoperative photography to document key procedural phases and standardising the pathological assessment of specimens. The QA measures will be adapted from the pilot study and tested iteratively, and the video and photo assessment tools will be tested for reliability and validity.
Ethics and dissemination: Ethics approval was obtained (NRES Committee South West-Frenchay, 25 April 2016, ref: 16/SW/0098). Results of the QA development study will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. Trial registration number: ISRCTN59036820, ISRCTN10386621.
2044-6055
1-7
Blencowe, Natalie S
760ada9f-1801-4ab4-9260-f2e2478b8ab0
Skilton, Anni
2e673bd0-d880-47a5-a600-0739b467866e
Gaunt, Daisy
927681a0-1d5e-47ad-a783-702ff06da447
Brierley, Rachel
2034eb69-fd07-40eb-8bc4-2d1d80493834
Hollowood, Andrew
b9726512-2f06-4268-9e1a-1febf3ec5dec
Dwerryhouse, Simon
957b56ab-d80a-4a36-987c-72278488fce9
Higgs, Simon
70a12c6f-ec8d-40ae-840d-10ca6c58c1e5
Robb, William
a6f908de-ef48-41c6-8f6f-cabf8e38c7c7
Boddy, Alex
3445e827-9117-4700-a2bb-8c6c6ec703f0
Hanna, George
4346cffe-4a9d-4456-b17b-d9b5d2c21621
Barham, C Paul
1490beb5-a2c5-4f89-a61a-2a3ec477fb3b
Blazeby, Jane
689d490e-fca3-4430-88de-f19ec6cebf58
Underwood, Timothy
8e81bf60-edd2-4b0e-8324-3068c95ea1c6
ROMIO Study Team
Blencowe, Natalie S
760ada9f-1801-4ab4-9260-f2e2478b8ab0
Skilton, Anni
2e673bd0-d880-47a5-a600-0739b467866e
Gaunt, Daisy
927681a0-1d5e-47ad-a783-702ff06da447
Brierley, Rachel
2034eb69-fd07-40eb-8bc4-2d1d80493834
Hollowood, Andrew
b9726512-2f06-4268-9e1a-1febf3ec5dec
Dwerryhouse, Simon
957b56ab-d80a-4a36-987c-72278488fce9
Higgs, Simon
70a12c6f-ec8d-40ae-840d-10ca6c58c1e5
Robb, William
a6f908de-ef48-41c6-8f6f-cabf8e38c7c7
Boddy, Alex
3445e827-9117-4700-a2bb-8c6c6ec703f0
Hanna, George
4346cffe-4a9d-4456-b17b-d9b5d2c21621
Barham, C Paul
1490beb5-a2c5-4f89-a61a-2a3ec477fb3b
Blazeby, Jane
689d490e-fca3-4430-88de-f19ec6cebf58
Underwood, Timothy
8e81bf60-edd2-4b0e-8324-3068c95ea1c6

Blencowe, Natalie S, Skilton, Anni, Gaunt, Daisy, Brierley, Rachel, Hollowood, Andrew, Dwerryhouse, Simon, Higgs, Simon, Robb, William, Boddy, Alex, Hanna, George, Barham, C Paul and Blazeby, Jane , ROMIO Study Team (2019) Protocol for developing quality assurance measures to use in surgical trials: an example from the ROMIO study. BMJ Open, 9 (3), 1-7, [e026209]. (doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026209).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Introduction: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in surgery are frequently criticised because surgeon expertise and standards of surgery are not considered or accounted for during study design. This is particularly true in pragmatic trials (which typically involve multiple centres and surgeons and are based in 'real world' settings), compared with explanatory trials (which are smaller and more tightly controlled).
Objective: This protocol describes a process to develop and test quality assurance (QA) measures for use within a predominantly pragmatic surgical RCT comparing minimally invasive and open techniques for oesophageal cancer (the NIHR ROMIO study). It builds on methods initiated in the ROMIO pilot RCT.
Methodsamd analysis: We have identified three distinct types of QA measure: (i) entry criteria for surgeons, through assessment of operative videos, (ii) standardisation of operative techniques (by establishing minimum key procedural phases) and (iii) monitoring of surgeons during the trial, using intraoperative photography to document key procedural phases and standardising the pathological assessment of specimens. The QA measures will be adapted from the pilot study and tested iteratively, and the video and photo assessment tools will be tested for reliability and validity.
Ethics and dissemination: Ethics approval was obtained (NRES Committee South West-Frenchay, 25 April 2016, ref: 16/SW/0098). Results of the QA development study will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. Trial registration number: ISRCTN59036820, ISRCTN10386621.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 2 January 2019
e-pub ahead of print date: 1 March 2019
Published date: 2019

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 432217
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/432217
ISSN: 2044-6055
PURE UUID: 35a8e176-2b44-4fbf-8958-d5411c70f12c
ORCID for Timothy Underwood: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-9455-2188

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 04 Jul 2019 16:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 03:35

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Natalie S Blencowe
Author: Anni Skilton
Author: Daisy Gaunt
Author: Rachel Brierley
Author: Andrew Hollowood
Author: Simon Dwerryhouse
Author: Simon Higgs
Author: William Robb
Author: Alex Boddy
Author: George Hanna
Author: C Paul Barham
Author: Jane Blazeby
Corporate Author: ROMIO Study Team

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×