The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Lightning protection of CFRP wind turbine blades - What is the dominant cause of failure: Specific energy or charge?

Lightning protection of CFRP wind turbine blades - What is the dominant cause of failure: Specific energy or charge?
Lightning protection of CFRP wind turbine blades - What is the dominant cause of failure: Specific energy or charge?
This paper investigated which component of a lightning strike is responsible for the majority of damage in Carbon Fiber Reinforced Plastic (CFRP) by investigating the strength loss induced by the exposure to two different electric current waveforms. The two waveforms used were the 10/350μs waveform simulating the first return stroke during a direct strike according to IEC 61400-24 Ed1.0 and the second was a unipolar long stroke component. CFRP strip specimens were manufactured and subjected to the two waveforms of electric current to simulate a lightning strike event. After exposure, specimens were extracted from the CFRP strips, and then loaded in compression and shear to determine the residual strength remaining. The compression tests were conducted on uniaxial coupons and loaded in accordance to ASTM standard D6641. Shear tests were conducted on V-notch specimens and loaded in an Iosipescu test rig in accordance to ASTM standard D5379. The results of the tests were compared to CFRP coupons, which were not exposed to any electrical current. A comparison between undamaged specimens and damaged specimens was made to determine which has more effect on the strength degradation; electric charge from the long stroke component or specific energy from the first return stroke. The results show that impulse current has more impact on strength degradation than a unipolar long stroke current.
Lightning Protection, Wind Turbine Blades, Charge v Specific Energy, Failure Strength
Harrell, T.M.
c97349b6-6f27-423d-b3d1-e35b30552692
Thomsen, O.T.
f3e60b22-a09f-4d58-90da-d58e37d68047
Dulieu-Barton, J.M.
9e35bebb-2185-4d16-a1bc-bb8f20e06632
Madsen, S.F.
ea8ee618-05d5-4c5e-85b4-d6ef7cc3b865
Carloni, L.
b70d68c0-1454-4ceb-ad68-7501d91ccb91
Harrell, T.M.
c97349b6-6f27-423d-b3d1-e35b30552692
Thomsen, O.T.
f3e60b22-a09f-4d58-90da-d58e37d68047
Dulieu-Barton, J.M.
9e35bebb-2185-4d16-a1bc-bb8f20e06632
Madsen, S.F.
ea8ee618-05d5-4c5e-85b4-d6ef7cc3b865
Carloni, L.
b70d68c0-1454-4ceb-ad68-7501d91ccb91

Harrell, T.M., Thomsen, O.T., Dulieu-Barton, J.M., Madsen, S.F. and Carloni, L. (2017) Lightning protection of CFRP wind turbine blades - What is the dominant cause of failure: Specific energy or charge? International Conference on Lightning & Static Electricity, Winc Aichi, Japan. 13 - 15 Sep 2017. 5 pp .

Record type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)

Abstract

This paper investigated which component of a lightning strike is responsible for the majority of damage in Carbon Fiber Reinforced Plastic (CFRP) by investigating the strength loss induced by the exposure to two different electric current waveforms. The two waveforms used were the 10/350μs waveform simulating the first return stroke during a direct strike according to IEC 61400-24 Ed1.0 and the second was a unipolar long stroke component. CFRP strip specimens were manufactured and subjected to the two waveforms of electric current to simulate a lightning strike event. After exposure, specimens were extracted from the CFRP strips, and then loaded in compression and shear to determine the residual strength remaining. The compression tests were conducted on uniaxial coupons and loaded in accordance to ASTM standard D6641. Shear tests were conducted on V-notch specimens and loaded in an Iosipescu test rig in accordance to ASTM standard D5379. The results of the tests were compared to CFRP coupons, which were not exposed to any electrical current. A comparison between undamaged specimens and damaged specimens was made to determine which has more effect on the strength degradation; electric charge from the long stroke component or specific energy from the first return stroke. The results show that impulse current has more impact on strength degradation than a unipolar long stroke current.

Text
Harrell_ICOLSE2017-Paper_finalrev_w_corrections
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy

More information

Published date: 23 September 2017
Venue - Dates: International Conference on Lightning & Static Electricity, Winc Aichi, Japan, 2017-09-13 - 2017-09-15
Keywords: Lightning Protection, Wind Turbine Blades, Charge v Specific Energy, Failure Strength

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 432404
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/432404
PURE UUID: 041247c6-056c-4cfe-8ad4-5326acc7b81e
ORCID for T.M. Harrell: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-0783-533X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 12 Jul 2019 16:30
Last modified: 12 Aug 2020 01:44

Export record

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×