The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Best time to assess complete clinical response after chemoradiotherapy in squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (ACT II): a post-hoc analysis of randomised controlled phase 3 trial

Best time to assess complete clinical response after chemoradiotherapy in squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (ACT II): a post-hoc analysis of randomised controlled phase 3 trial
Best time to assess complete clinical response after chemoradiotherapy in squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (ACT II): a post-hoc analysis of randomised controlled phase 3 trial
BACKGROUND:
Guidelines for anal cancer recommend assessment of response at 6-12 weeks after starting treatment. Using data from the ACT II trial, we determined the optimum timepoint to assess clinical tumour response after chemoradiotherapy.

METHODS:
The previously reported ACT II trial was a phase 3 randomised trial of patients of any age with newly diagnosed, histologically confirmed, squamous cell carcinoma of the anus without metastatic disease from 59 centres in the UK. We randomly assigned patients (by minimisation) to receive either intravenous mitomycin (one dose of 12 mg/m2 on day 1) or intravenous cisplatin (one dose of 60 mg/m2 on days 1 and 29), with intravenous fluorouracil (one dose of 1000 mg/m2 per day on days 1-4 and 29-32) and radiotherapy (50·4 Gy in 28 daily fractions); and also did a second randomisation after initial therapy to maintenance chemotherapy (fluorouracil and cisplatin) or no maintenance chemotherapy. The primary outcome was complete clinical response (the absence of primary and nodal tumour by clinical examination), in addition to overall survival and progression-free survival from time of randomisation. In this post-hoc analysis, we analysed complete clinical response at three timepoints: 11 weeks from the start of chemoradiotherapy (assessment 1), 18 weeks from the start of chemoradiotherapy (assessment 2), and 26 weeks from the start of chemoradiotherapy (assessment 3) as well as the overall and progression-free survival estimates of patients with complete clinical response or without complete clinical response at each assessment. We analysed both the overall trial population and a subgroup of patients who had attended each of the three assessments by modified intention-to-treat. This study is registered at controlled-trials.com, ISRCTN 26715889.

FINDINGS:
We enrolled 940 patients from June 4, 2001, until Dec 16, 2008. Complete clinical response was achieved in 492 (52%) of 940 patients at assessment 1 (11 weeks), 665 (71%) of patients at assessment 2 (18 weeks), and 730 (78%) of patients at assessment 3 (26 weeks). 691 patients attended all three assessments and in this subgroup, complete clinical response was reported in 441 (64%) patients at assessment 1, 556 (80%) at assessment 2, and 590 (85%) at assessments 3. 151 (72%) of the 209 patients who had not had a complete clinical response at assessment 1 had a complete clinical response by assessment 3. In the overall trial population of 940 patients, 5 year overall survival in patients who had a clinical response at assessments 1, 2, 3 was 83% (95% CI 79-86), 84% (81-87), and 87% (84-89), respectively and was 72% (66-78), 59% (49-67), and 46% (37-55) for patients who did not have a complete clinical response at assessments 1, 2, 3, respectively. In the subgroup of 691 patients, 5 year overall survival in patients who had a clinical response at assessment 1, 2, 3 was 85% (81-88), 86% (82-88), and 87% (84-90), respectively, and was 75% (68-80), 61% (50-70), and 48% (36-58) for patients who did not have a complete clinical response at assessment 1, 2, 3, respectively. Similarly, progression-free survival in both the overall trial population and the subgroup was longer in patients who had a complete clinical response, compared with patients who did not have a complete clinical response, at all three assessments.

INTERPRETATION:
Many patients who do not have a complete clinical response when assessed at 11 weeks after commencing chemoradiotherapy do in fact respond by 26 weeks, and the earlier assessment could lead to some patients having unnecessary surgery. Our data suggests that the optimum time for assessment of complete clinical response after chemoradiotherapy for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the anus is 26 weeks from starting chemoradiotherapy. We suggest that guidelines should be revised to indicate that later assessment is acceptable.
1470-2045
347-356
Gynne-Jones, Robert
1f6b9b62-4614-4eb9-b6c3-c30ce2fed982
Seabag-Montefiore, David
b90bd8ea-68bd-4ac8-93c0-39cf728f3bb2
Meadows, Helen
151e8d1c-8e4c-42ae-be9e-59dcf54af017
Cunningham, David
63773739-4451-4f49-b56d-c12cbce4e4c9
Begum, Rubina
107cf8a2-0022-48df-9d22-99f15ae6fc6b
Adab, Fawzi
437f24c4-960f-4e15-830c-508c9b7f8e0a
Benstead, Kim
62d81464-05d8-42ae-b7d8-778a37fe3080
Harte, Robert J.
5aa0a57f-9fb8-441f-a160-2ddc676a00c7
Stewart, Jill
70024691-3bd3-4f63-9303-ad4c296622c7
Beare, Sandy
92fba873-c657-4754-a73f-14cb9ccf0413
Hackshaw, Allan
fabfe335-1aa6-4634-9d4a-0a1f3fac5b32
Kadalayil, Latha
e620b801-844a-45d9-acaf-e0a58acd7cf2
ACT II study group
Gynne-Jones, Robert
1f6b9b62-4614-4eb9-b6c3-c30ce2fed982
Seabag-Montefiore, David
b90bd8ea-68bd-4ac8-93c0-39cf728f3bb2
Meadows, Helen
151e8d1c-8e4c-42ae-be9e-59dcf54af017
Cunningham, David
63773739-4451-4f49-b56d-c12cbce4e4c9
Begum, Rubina
107cf8a2-0022-48df-9d22-99f15ae6fc6b
Adab, Fawzi
437f24c4-960f-4e15-830c-508c9b7f8e0a
Benstead, Kim
62d81464-05d8-42ae-b7d8-778a37fe3080
Harte, Robert J.
5aa0a57f-9fb8-441f-a160-2ddc676a00c7
Stewart, Jill
70024691-3bd3-4f63-9303-ad4c296622c7
Beare, Sandy
92fba873-c657-4754-a73f-14cb9ccf0413
Hackshaw, Allan
fabfe335-1aa6-4634-9d4a-0a1f3fac5b32
Kadalayil, Latha
e620b801-844a-45d9-acaf-e0a58acd7cf2

Gynne-Jones, Robert, Seabag-Montefiore, David, Meadows, Helen, Cunningham, David, Begum, Rubina, Adab, Fawzi, Benstead, Kim, Harte, Robert J., Stewart, Jill, Beare, Sandy, Hackshaw, Allan and Kadalayil, Latha , ACT II study group (2017) Best time to assess complete clinical response after chemoradiotherapy in squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (ACT II): a post-hoc analysis of randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncology, 18 (3), 347-356. (doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30071-2).

Record type: Article

Abstract

BACKGROUND:
Guidelines for anal cancer recommend assessment of response at 6-12 weeks after starting treatment. Using data from the ACT II trial, we determined the optimum timepoint to assess clinical tumour response after chemoradiotherapy.

METHODS:
The previously reported ACT II trial was a phase 3 randomised trial of patients of any age with newly diagnosed, histologically confirmed, squamous cell carcinoma of the anus without metastatic disease from 59 centres in the UK. We randomly assigned patients (by minimisation) to receive either intravenous mitomycin (one dose of 12 mg/m2 on day 1) or intravenous cisplatin (one dose of 60 mg/m2 on days 1 and 29), with intravenous fluorouracil (one dose of 1000 mg/m2 per day on days 1-4 and 29-32) and radiotherapy (50·4 Gy in 28 daily fractions); and also did a second randomisation after initial therapy to maintenance chemotherapy (fluorouracil and cisplatin) or no maintenance chemotherapy. The primary outcome was complete clinical response (the absence of primary and nodal tumour by clinical examination), in addition to overall survival and progression-free survival from time of randomisation. In this post-hoc analysis, we analysed complete clinical response at three timepoints: 11 weeks from the start of chemoradiotherapy (assessment 1), 18 weeks from the start of chemoradiotherapy (assessment 2), and 26 weeks from the start of chemoradiotherapy (assessment 3) as well as the overall and progression-free survival estimates of patients with complete clinical response or without complete clinical response at each assessment. We analysed both the overall trial population and a subgroup of patients who had attended each of the three assessments by modified intention-to-treat. This study is registered at controlled-trials.com, ISRCTN 26715889.

FINDINGS:
We enrolled 940 patients from June 4, 2001, until Dec 16, 2008. Complete clinical response was achieved in 492 (52%) of 940 patients at assessment 1 (11 weeks), 665 (71%) of patients at assessment 2 (18 weeks), and 730 (78%) of patients at assessment 3 (26 weeks). 691 patients attended all three assessments and in this subgroup, complete clinical response was reported in 441 (64%) patients at assessment 1, 556 (80%) at assessment 2, and 590 (85%) at assessments 3. 151 (72%) of the 209 patients who had not had a complete clinical response at assessment 1 had a complete clinical response by assessment 3. In the overall trial population of 940 patients, 5 year overall survival in patients who had a clinical response at assessments 1, 2, 3 was 83% (95% CI 79-86), 84% (81-87), and 87% (84-89), respectively and was 72% (66-78), 59% (49-67), and 46% (37-55) for patients who did not have a complete clinical response at assessments 1, 2, 3, respectively. In the subgroup of 691 patients, 5 year overall survival in patients who had a clinical response at assessment 1, 2, 3 was 85% (81-88), 86% (82-88), and 87% (84-90), respectively, and was 75% (68-80), 61% (50-70), and 48% (36-58) for patients who did not have a complete clinical response at assessment 1, 2, 3, respectively. Similarly, progression-free survival in both the overall trial population and the subgroup was longer in patients who had a complete clinical response, compared with patients who did not have a complete clinical response, at all three assessments.

INTERPRETATION:
Many patients who do not have a complete clinical response when assessed at 11 weeks after commencing chemoradiotherapy do in fact respond by 26 weeks, and the earlier assessment could lead to some patients having unnecessary surgery. Our data suggests that the optimum time for assessment of complete clinical response after chemoradiotherapy for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the anus is 26 weeks from starting chemoradiotherapy. We suggest that guidelines should be revised to indicate that later assessment is acceptable.

Text
1-s2.0-S1470204517300712-main - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (549kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 7 February 2017
e-pub ahead of print date: 10 February 2017
Published date: March 2017

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 432583
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/432583
ISSN: 1470-2045
PURE UUID: a7a85ff0-3f34-43cf-856a-c166dd84c6c5

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 19 Jul 2019 16:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 02:56

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Robert Gynne-Jones
Author: David Seabag-Montefiore
Author: Helen Meadows
Author: David Cunningham
Author: Rubina Begum
Author: Fawzi Adab
Author: Kim Benstead
Author: Robert J. Harte
Author: Jill Stewart
Author: Sandy Beare
Author: Allan Hackshaw
Author: Latha Kadalayil
Corporate Author: ACT II study group

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×