The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The sensitivity of approved Ninhydrin and Biuret tests in the assessment of protein contamination on surgical steel as an aid to prevent iatrogenic prion transmission

The sensitivity of approved Ninhydrin and Biuret tests in the assessment of protein contamination on surgical steel as an aid to prevent iatrogenic prion transmission
The sensitivity of approved Ninhydrin and Biuret tests in the assessment of protein contamination on surgical steel as an aid to prevent iatrogenic prion transmission
Regulations recommend the routine application of biochemical tests, such as the Ninhydrin or Biuret tests, to confirm the efficacy of hospital sterile service department (SSD) washer-disinfector cycles in removing proteinaceous material, particularly with respect to prions. The effectiveness of these methods relies on both the effective sampling of the instruments and the sensitivity of the tests employed. Two commercially available contamination assessment tests were evaluated for their sensitivity to ME7 brain homogenate on surgical-grade stainless steel surfaces. Controls were visualized by the application of episcopic differential interference contrast/Epi-fluorescence microscopy (EDIC/EF) combined with the sensitive fluorescent reagent, SYPRO Ruby, which has been shown previously to rapidly visualize and assess low levels of contamination on medical devices. The Ninhydrin test displayed a minimum level of detection observed by 75% of volunteers (MLD75) of 9.25 ?g [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 8.6–10.0 ?g]. The Biuret test provided better sensitivity, with a MLD75 of 6.7 ?g (95% CI 5.4–8.2 ?g). However, much lower concentrations of proteinaceous soiling (pg) were visualized using the EDIC/EF microscopy method. From these findings, it is clear that these approved colorimetric tests of cleaning are relatively insensitive. This investigation demonstrates how large amounts (up to 6.5 ?g) of proteinaceous brain contamination could remain undetected and the instruments deemed clean using such methods. The application of more sensitive cleanliness evaluation methods should be applied to reduce the risk of iatrogenic transmission of prion disease in ‘high-risk’ instruments such as neurosurgical devices.
CJD, Prions, Decontamination, Surgical instruments, Microscopy, Sterile service departments
0195-6701
288-292
Lipscomb, I.P
a6b1b336-cd72-4e0e-b46b-66a9ef80a22f
Pinchin, H.E.
ad878307-ff26-4f89-aada-ff75cf1663ce
Collin, R.
a616d2cb-f11d-4fba-b353-61bcc678449a
Harris, K.
c08336c0-6db3-4798-8695-8f7bc7d6d5fa
Keevil, C.W.
cb7de0a7-ce33-4cfa-af52-07f99e5650eb
Lipscomb, I.P
a6b1b336-cd72-4e0e-b46b-66a9ef80a22f
Pinchin, H.E.
ad878307-ff26-4f89-aada-ff75cf1663ce
Collin, R.
a616d2cb-f11d-4fba-b353-61bcc678449a
Harris, K.
c08336c0-6db3-4798-8695-8f7bc7d6d5fa
Keevil, C.W.
cb7de0a7-ce33-4cfa-af52-07f99e5650eb

Lipscomb, I.P, Pinchin, H.E., Collin, R., Harris, K. and Keevil, C.W. (2006) The sensitivity of approved Ninhydrin and Biuret tests in the assessment of protein contamination on surgical steel as an aid to prevent iatrogenic prion transmission. Journal of Hospital Infection, 64 (3), 288-292. (doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2006.07.007).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Regulations recommend the routine application of biochemical tests, such as the Ninhydrin or Biuret tests, to confirm the efficacy of hospital sterile service department (SSD) washer-disinfector cycles in removing proteinaceous material, particularly with respect to prions. The effectiveness of these methods relies on both the effective sampling of the instruments and the sensitivity of the tests employed. Two commercially available contamination assessment tests were evaluated for their sensitivity to ME7 brain homogenate on surgical-grade stainless steel surfaces. Controls were visualized by the application of episcopic differential interference contrast/Epi-fluorescence microscopy (EDIC/EF) combined with the sensitive fluorescent reagent, SYPRO Ruby, which has been shown previously to rapidly visualize and assess low levels of contamination on medical devices. The Ninhydrin test displayed a minimum level of detection observed by 75% of volunteers (MLD75) of 9.25 ?g [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 8.6–10.0 ?g]. The Biuret test provided better sensitivity, with a MLD75 of 6.7 ?g (95% CI 5.4–8.2 ?g). However, much lower concentrations of proteinaceous soiling (pg) were visualized using the EDIC/EF microscopy method. From these findings, it is clear that these approved colorimetric tests of cleaning are relatively insensitive. This investigation demonstrates how large amounts (up to 6.5 ?g) of proteinaceous brain contamination could remain undetected and the instruments deemed clean using such methods. The application of more sensitive cleanliness evaluation methods should be applied to reduce the risk of iatrogenic transmission of prion disease in ‘high-risk’ instruments such as neurosurgical devices.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Submitted date: 19 June 2006
Published date: 18 September 2006
Keywords: CJD, Prions, Decontamination, Surgical instruments, Microscopy, Sterile service departments

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 43261
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/43261
ISSN: 0195-6701
PURE UUID: 295dc34b-af00-4545-8cc6-54e0b70d6b90
ORCID for C.W. Keevil: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1917-7706

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 19 Jan 2007
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 03:24

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: I.P Lipscomb
Author: H.E. Pinchin
Author: R. Collin
Author: K. Harris
Author: C.W. Keevil ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×