The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The response to patient deterioration in the UK National Health Service - a survey of acute hospital policies

The response to patient deterioration in the UK National Health Service - a survey of acute hospital policies
The response to patient deterioration in the UK National Health Service - a survey of acute hospital policies

Background: The assessment of acute-illness severity in adult non-pregnant patients in the United Kingdom is based on early warning score (EWS)values that determine the urgency and nature of the response to patient deterioration. This study aimed to describe, and identify variations in, the expected clinical response outlined in ‘deteriorating patient’ policies/guidelines in acute NHS hospitals. Methods: A copy of the local ‘deteriorating patient’ policy/guideline was requested from 152 hospitals. Each was analysed against pre-determined areas of interest, e.g., minimum expected vital sign observations frequency, expected response and expected staff response times. Results: In the 55 responding hospitals (36.2%), the documented structure and process of the response to deterioration varied considerably. All hospitals used a 12-hourly minimum vital signs measurement frequency. Thereafter, for a low-risk patient, the minimum frequency varied from ‘6–12 hourly’ to ‘hourly’. Frequencies were higher for higher risk categories. Expected escalation responses were highly individualised between hospitals. Other than repeat observations, only nine (16.4%)documents described specific clinical actions for ward staff to consider/perform whilst awaiting responding personnel. Maximum permitted response times for medium-risk and high-risk patients varied widely, even when based on the same EWS. Only 33/55 documents (60%)gave clear instructions regarding who to contact ‘out of hours’. Conclusions: The ‘deteriorating patient’ policies of the hospitals studied varied in their contents and often omitted precise instructions for staff. We recommend that individual hospitals review these documents, and that research and/or consensus are used to develop a national algorithm regarding the response to patient deterioration.

Early warning scores, National Early Warning Score, Patient deterioration, Policies, Rapid response systems
0300-9572
152-158
Freathy, Simon
c01b585c-2b2c-4432-b363-5196deab9dac
Smith, Gary B.
6a214baf-1020-40a7-96e2-ecd3ad360896
Schoonhoven, Lisette
46a2705b-c657-409b-b9da-329d5b1b02de
Westwood, Greta
896b2716-743f-43df-a0af-a398d0e808cd
Freathy, Simon
c01b585c-2b2c-4432-b363-5196deab9dac
Smith, Gary B.
6a214baf-1020-40a7-96e2-ecd3ad360896
Schoonhoven, Lisette
46a2705b-c657-409b-b9da-329d5b1b02de
Westwood, Greta
896b2716-743f-43df-a0af-a398d0e808cd

Freathy, Simon, Smith, Gary B., Schoonhoven, Lisette and Westwood, Greta (2019) The response to patient deterioration in the UK National Health Service - a survey of acute hospital policies. Resuscitation, 139, 152-158. (doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.04.016).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: The assessment of acute-illness severity in adult non-pregnant patients in the United Kingdom is based on early warning score (EWS)values that determine the urgency and nature of the response to patient deterioration. This study aimed to describe, and identify variations in, the expected clinical response outlined in ‘deteriorating patient’ policies/guidelines in acute NHS hospitals. Methods: A copy of the local ‘deteriorating patient’ policy/guideline was requested from 152 hospitals. Each was analysed against pre-determined areas of interest, e.g., minimum expected vital sign observations frequency, expected response and expected staff response times. Results: In the 55 responding hospitals (36.2%), the documented structure and process of the response to deterioration varied considerably. All hospitals used a 12-hourly minimum vital signs measurement frequency. Thereafter, for a low-risk patient, the minimum frequency varied from ‘6–12 hourly’ to ‘hourly’. Frequencies were higher for higher risk categories. Expected escalation responses were highly individualised between hospitals. Other than repeat observations, only nine (16.4%)documents described specific clinical actions for ward staff to consider/perform whilst awaiting responding personnel. Maximum permitted response times for medium-risk and high-risk patients varied widely, even when based on the same EWS. Only 33/55 documents (60%)gave clear instructions regarding who to contact ‘out of hours’. Conclusions: The ‘deteriorating patient’ policies of the hospitals studied varied in their contents and often omitted precise instructions for staff. We recommend that individual hospitals review these documents, and that research and/or consensus are used to develop a national algorithm regarding the response to patient deterioration.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 10 April 2019
e-pub ahead of print date: 18 April 2019
Published date: 1 June 2019
Keywords: Early warning scores, National Early Warning Score, Patient deterioration, Policies, Rapid response systems

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 432817
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/432817
ISSN: 0300-9572
PURE UUID: 8e0b0720-250f-4e13-a1d3-bb0ad8301d2e
ORCID for Lisette Schoonhoven: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-7129-3766

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 26 Jul 2019 16:30
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 03:20

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Simon Freathy
Author: Gary B. Smith
Author: Greta Westwood

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×