The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Post-depositional overprinting of chromium in foraminifera

Post-depositional overprinting of chromium in foraminifera
Post-depositional overprinting of chromium in foraminifera

Present-day ocean deoxygenation has major implications for marine ecosystems and biogeochemical cycling in the oceans. Chromium isotopes are used as a proxy to infer changes in past oceanic redox state. Chromium isotopes in carbonates, including the prime proxy carrier foraminifera, were initially thought to record the seawater composition during crystallisation. However, the uptake of Cr into foraminiferal tests and carbonates is still poorly understood and recent studies question this assumption. We assess whether Cr in foraminiferal calcite is taken up during biomineralisation, has a post-depositional origin or is a combination of the two. Laser Ablation-MC-ICP-MS analyses and NanoSIMS imaging of individual tests were used to characterise the distribution of Cr in both planktic and benthic foraminifera. Foraminifera in sediment core-top samples have up to two orders of magnitude more Cr than sediment trap, plankton net, and culture samples. In cultured specimens, Cr is incorporated in foraminiferal tests at low concentrations (0.04–0.13 ppm) with a distribution coefficient of ∼250 ± 43 (2SE) which is an upper estimate due to substantial loss of dissolved Cr during the experiment. Part of the Cr signal in sedimentary foraminifera may be primary, but this primary signal is likely often overprinted by the uptake of Cr from bottom and pore waters. In sediment samples, there is no significant isotopic offset between individual species and bulk foraminiferal calcite from the same size fraction. The >500 μm fraction has a heavier isotopic composition than the smaller 250–500 μm fraction with an offset of −0.3 to −0.5‰ due to an increase in surface area to volume. We propose that Cr in foraminifera is predominantly post-depositional and records bottom/pore water signals. This is contrary to current interpretations of the foraminiferal Cr isotope proxy as a surface seawater redox proxy.

chromium, diagenesis, distribution coefficient, foraminifera, laser ablation, nanoSIMS
0012-821X
100-111
Remmelzwaal, Serginio R.C.
3dbb413e-560a-484a-ae69-94b7415906cb
Sadekov, Aleksey Yu
091ff7c1-b89d-4051-8b55-d7a3036c44a8
Parkinson, Ian J.
f199f02a-6c0d-429a-b3a1-144305668383
Schmidt, Daniela N.
86a34245-7197-4ad2-984c-40374fe00b60
Titelboim, Danna
866eacb7-6628-48a5-8785-d07c4bbdb45f
Abramovich, Sigal
4d85eb8b-1c54-4ca3-9838-83c97b35ede4
Roepert, Anne
87ba2c2b-6ca1-48ee-8e92-f68f567c1240
Kienhuis, Michiel
79405ff1-713b-417c-bfcc-fac69df705f6
Polerecky, Lubos
589d9c0a-0fc5-4779-a0d0-68289b4f6620
Goring-Harford, Heather
a0d7f7d0-4593-4bd9-9482-b2d783c0ac97
Kimoto, Katsunori
b19c94ba-274a-4364-a4b7-b6aa2dbfec9c
Allen, Katherine A.
b9a1a9df-932c-41b3-a22c-503678390a67
Holland, Kate
a430a333-14de-4ba2-906d-5e88b3e90093
Stewart, Joseph A.
3d7f8398-d59b-458b-a3c9-e6a54d87e9b1
Middelburg, Jack J.
abdca8a9-843f-4940-afe1-81c4df84b913
Remmelzwaal, Serginio R.C.
3dbb413e-560a-484a-ae69-94b7415906cb
Sadekov, Aleksey Yu
091ff7c1-b89d-4051-8b55-d7a3036c44a8
Parkinson, Ian J.
f199f02a-6c0d-429a-b3a1-144305668383
Schmidt, Daniela N.
86a34245-7197-4ad2-984c-40374fe00b60
Titelboim, Danna
866eacb7-6628-48a5-8785-d07c4bbdb45f
Abramovich, Sigal
4d85eb8b-1c54-4ca3-9838-83c97b35ede4
Roepert, Anne
87ba2c2b-6ca1-48ee-8e92-f68f567c1240
Kienhuis, Michiel
79405ff1-713b-417c-bfcc-fac69df705f6
Polerecky, Lubos
589d9c0a-0fc5-4779-a0d0-68289b4f6620
Goring-Harford, Heather
a0d7f7d0-4593-4bd9-9482-b2d783c0ac97
Kimoto, Katsunori
b19c94ba-274a-4364-a4b7-b6aa2dbfec9c
Allen, Katherine A.
b9a1a9df-932c-41b3-a22c-503678390a67
Holland, Kate
a430a333-14de-4ba2-906d-5e88b3e90093
Stewart, Joseph A.
3d7f8398-d59b-458b-a3c9-e6a54d87e9b1
Middelburg, Jack J.
abdca8a9-843f-4940-afe1-81c4df84b913

Remmelzwaal, Serginio R.C., Sadekov, Aleksey Yu, Parkinson, Ian J., Schmidt, Daniela N., Titelboim, Danna, Abramovich, Sigal, Roepert, Anne, Kienhuis, Michiel, Polerecky, Lubos, Goring-Harford, Heather, Kimoto, Katsunori, Allen, Katherine A., Holland, Kate, Stewart, Joseph A. and Middelburg, Jack J. (2019) Post-depositional overprinting of chromium in foraminifera. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 515 (1), 100-111. (doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2019.03.001).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Present-day ocean deoxygenation has major implications for marine ecosystems and biogeochemical cycling in the oceans. Chromium isotopes are used as a proxy to infer changes in past oceanic redox state. Chromium isotopes in carbonates, including the prime proxy carrier foraminifera, were initially thought to record the seawater composition during crystallisation. However, the uptake of Cr into foraminiferal tests and carbonates is still poorly understood and recent studies question this assumption. We assess whether Cr in foraminiferal calcite is taken up during biomineralisation, has a post-depositional origin or is a combination of the two. Laser Ablation-MC-ICP-MS analyses and NanoSIMS imaging of individual tests were used to characterise the distribution of Cr in both planktic and benthic foraminifera. Foraminifera in sediment core-top samples have up to two orders of magnitude more Cr than sediment trap, plankton net, and culture samples. In cultured specimens, Cr is incorporated in foraminiferal tests at low concentrations (0.04–0.13 ppm) with a distribution coefficient of ∼250 ± 43 (2SE) which is an upper estimate due to substantial loss of dissolved Cr during the experiment. Part of the Cr signal in sedimentary foraminifera may be primary, but this primary signal is likely often overprinted by the uptake of Cr from bottom and pore waters. In sediment samples, there is no significant isotopic offset between individual species and bulk foraminiferal calcite from the same size fraction. The >500 μm fraction has a heavier isotopic composition than the smaller 250–500 μm fraction with an offset of −0.3 to −0.5‰ due to an increase in surface area to volume. We propose that Cr in foraminifera is predominantly post-depositional and records bottom/pore water signals. This is contrary to current interpretations of the foraminiferal Cr isotope proxy as a surface seawater redox proxy.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 1 March 2019
e-pub ahead of print date: 28 March 2019
Published date: 1 June 2019
Keywords: chromium, diagenesis, distribution coefficient, foraminifera, laser ablation, nanoSIMS

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 432829
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/432829
ISSN: 0012-821X
PURE UUID: 7b7e70ca-18bf-4cab-be73-d199c7137a1f

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 26 Jul 2019 16:30
Last modified: 15 Apr 2024 17:08

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Serginio R.C. Remmelzwaal
Author: Aleksey Yu Sadekov
Author: Ian J. Parkinson
Author: Daniela N. Schmidt
Author: Danna Titelboim
Author: Sigal Abramovich
Author: Anne Roepert
Author: Michiel Kienhuis
Author: Lubos Polerecky
Author: Katsunori Kimoto
Author: Katherine A. Allen
Author: Kate Holland
Author: Joseph A. Stewart
Author: Jack J. Middelburg

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×