Post-depositional overprinting of chromium in foraminifera
Post-depositional overprinting of chromium in foraminifera
Present-day ocean deoxygenation has major implications for marine ecosystems and biogeochemical cycling in the oceans. Chromium isotopes are used as a proxy to infer changes in past oceanic redox state. Chromium isotopes in carbonates, including the prime proxy carrier foraminifera, were initially thought to record the seawater composition during crystallisation. However, the uptake of Cr into foraminiferal tests and carbonates is still poorly understood and recent studies question this assumption. We assess whether Cr in foraminiferal calcite is taken up during biomineralisation, has a post-depositional origin or is a combination of the two. Laser Ablation-MC-ICP-MS analyses and NanoSIMS imaging of individual tests were used to characterise the distribution of Cr in both planktic and benthic foraminifera. Foraminifera in sediment core-top samples have up to two orders of magnitude more Cr than sediment trap, plankton net, and culture samples. In cultured specimens, Cr is incorporated in foraminiferal tests at low concentrations (0.04–0.13 ppm) with a distribution coefficient of ∼250 ± 43 (2SE) which is an upper estimate due to substantial loss of dissolved Cr during the experiment. Part of the Cr signal in sedimentary foraminifera may be primary, but this primary signal is likely often overprinted by the uptake of Cr from bottom and pore waters. In sediment samples, there is no significant isotopic offset between individual species and bulk foraminiferal calcite from the same size fraction. The >500 μm fraction has a heavier isotopic composition than the smaller 250–500 μm fraction with an offset of −0.3 to −0.5‰ due to an increase in surface area to volume. We propose that Cr in foraminifera is predominantly post-depositional and records bottom/pore water signals. This is contrary to current interpretations of the foraminiferal Cr isotope proxy as a surface seawater redox proxy.
chromium, diagenesis, distribution coefficient, foraminifera, laser ablation, nanoSIMS
100-111
Remmelzwaal, Serginio R.C.
3dbb413e-560a-484a-ae69-94b7415906cb
Sadekov, Aleksey Yu
091ff7c1-b89d-4051-8b55-d7a3036c44a8
Parkinson, Ian J.
f199f02a-6c0d-429a-b3a1-144305668383
Schmidt, Daniela N.
86a34245-7197-4ad2-984c-40374fe00b60
Titelboim, Danna
866eacb7-6628-48a5-8785-d07c4bbdb45f
Abramovich, Sigal
4d85eb8b-1c54-4ca3-9838-83c97b35ede4
Roepert, Anne
87ba2c2b-6ca1-48ee-8e92-f68f567c1240
Kienhuis, Michiel
79405ff1-713b-417c-bfcc-fac69df705f6
Polerecky, Lubos
589d9c0a-0fc5-4779-a0d0-68289b4f6620
Goring-Harford, Heather
a0d7f7d0-4593-4bd9-9482-b2d783c0ac97
Kimoto, Katsunori
b19c94ba-274a-4364-a4b7-b6aa2dbfec9c
Allen, Katherine A.
b9a1a9df-932c-41b3-a22c-503678390a67
Holland, Kate
a430a333-14de-4ba2-906d-5e88b3e90093
Stewart, Joseph A.
3d7f8398-d59b-458b-a3c9-e6a54d87e9b1
Middelburg, Jack J.
abdca8a9-843f-4940-afe1-81c4df84b913
1 June 2019
Remmelzwaal, Serginio R.C.
3dbb413e-560a-484a-ae69-94b7415906cb
Sadekov, Aleksey Yu
091ff7c1-b89d-4051-8b55-d7a3036c44a8
Parkinson, Ian J.
f199f02a-6c0d-429a-b3a1-144305668383
Schmidt, Daniela N.
86a34245-7197-4ad2-984c-40374fe00b60
Titelboim, Danna
866eacb7-6628-48a5-8785-d07c4bbdb45f
Abramovich, Sigal
4d85eb8b-1c54-4ca3-9838-83c97b35ede4
Roepert, Anne
87ba2c2b-6ca1-48ee-8e92-f68f567c1240
Kienhuis, Michiel
79405ff1-713b-417c-bfcc-fac69df705f6
Polerecky, Lubos
589d9c0a-0fc5-4779-a0d0-68289b4f6620
Goring-Harford, Heather
a0d7f7d0-4593-4bd9-9482-b2d783c0ac97
Kimoto, Katsunori
b19c94ba-274a-4364-a4b7-b6aa2dbfec9c
Allen, Katherine A.
b9a1a9df-932c-41b3-a22c-503678390a67
Holland, Kate
a430a333-14de-4ba2-906d-5e88b3e90093
Stewart, Joseph A.
3d7f8398-d59b-458b-a3c9-e6a54d87e9b1
Middelburg, Jack J.
abdca8a9-843f-4940-afe1-81c4df84b913
Remmelzwaal, Serginio R.C., Sadekov, Aleksey Yu, Parkinson, Ian J., Schmidt, Daniela N., Titelboim, Danna, Abramovich, Sigal, Roepert, Anne, Kienhuis, Michiel, Polerecky, Lubos, Goring-Harford, Heather, Kimoto, Katsunori, Allen, Katherine A., Holland, Kate, Stewart, Joseph A. and Middelburg, Jack J.
(2019)
Post-depositional overprinting of chromium in foraminifera.
Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 515 (1), .
(doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2019.03.001).
Abstract
Present-day ocean deoxygenation has major implications for marine ecosystems and biogeochemical cycling in the oceans. Chromium isotopes are used as a proxy to infer changes in past oceanic redox state. Chromium isotopes in carbonates, including the prime proxy carrier foraminifera, were initially thought to record the seawater composition during crystallisation. However, the uptake of Cr into foraminiferal tests and carbonates is still poorly understood and recent studies question this assumption. We assess whether Cr in foraminiferal calcite is taken up during biomineralisation, has a post-depositional origin or is a combination of the two. Laser Ablation-MC-ICP-MS analyses and NanoSIMS imaging of individual tests were used to characterise the distribution of Cr in both planktic and benthic foraminifera. Foraminifera in sediment core-top samples have up to two orders of magnitude more Cr than sediment trap, plankton net, and culture samples. In cultured specimens, Cr is incorporated in foraminiferal tests at low concentrations (0.04–0.13 ppm) with a distribution coefficient of ∼250 ± 43 (2SE) which is an upper estimate due to substantial loss of dissolved Cr during the experiment. Part of the Cr signal in sedimentary foraminifera may be primary, but this primary signal is likely often overprinted by the uptake of Cr from bottom and pore waters. In sediment samples, there is no significant isotopic offset between individual species and bulk foraminiferal calcite from the same size fraction. The >500 μm fraction has a heavier isotopic composition than the smaller 250–500 μm fraction with an offset of −0.3 to −0.5‰ due to an increase in surface area to volume. We propose that Cr in foraminifera is predominantly post-depositional and records bottom/pore water signals. This is contrary to current interpretations of the foraminiferal Cr isotope proxy as a surface seawater redox proxy.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 1 March 2019
e-pub ahead of print date: 28 March 2019
Published date: 1 June 2019
Keywords:
chromium, diagenesis, distribution coefficient, foraminifera, laser ablation, nanoSIMS
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 432829
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/432829
ISSN: 0012-821X
PURE UUID: 7b7e70ca-18bf-4cab-be73-d199c7137a1f
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 26 Jul 2019 16:30
Last modified: 15 Apr 2024 17:08
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Serginio R.C. Remmelzwaal
Author:
Aleksey Yu Sadekov
Author:
Ian J. Parkinson
Author:
Daniela N. Schmidt
Author:
Danna Titelboim
Author:
Sigal Abramovich
Author:
Anne Roepert
Author:
Michiel Kienhuis
Author:
Lubos Polerecky
Author:
Katsunori Kimoto
Author:
Katherine A. Allen
Author:
Kate Holland
Author:
Joseph A. Stewart
Author:
Jack J. Middelburg
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics