The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Comparative performances of machine learning methods for classifying Crohn Disease patients using genome-wide genotyping data

Comparative performances of machine learning methods for classifying Crohn Disease patients using genome-wide genotyping data
Comparative performances of machine learning methods for classifying Crohn Disease patients using genome-wide genotyping data
Crohn Disease (CD) is a complex genetic disorder for which more than 140 genes have been identified using genome wide association studies (GWAS). However, the genetic architecture of the trait remains largely unknown. The recent development of machine learning (ML) approaches incited us to apply them to classify healthy and diseased people according to their genomic information. The Immunochip dataset containing 18,227 CD patients and 34,050 healthy controls enrolled and genotyped by the international Inflammatory Bowel Disease genetic consortium (IIBDGC) has been re-analyzed using a set of ML methods: penalized logistic regression (LR), gradient boosted trees (GBT) and artificial neural networks (NN). The main score used to compare the methods was the Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC) statistics. The impact of quality control (QC), imputing and coding methods on LR results showed that QC methods and imputation of missing genotypes may artificially increase the scores. At the opposite, neither the patient/control ratio nor marker preselection or coding strategies significantly affected the results. LR methods, including Lasso, Ridge and ElasticNet provided similar results with a maximum AUC of 0.80. GBT methods like XGBoost, LightGBM and CatBoost, together with dense NN with one or more hidden layers, provided similar AUC values, suggesting limited epistatic effects in the genetic architecture of the trait. ML methods detected near all the genetic variants previously identified by GWAS among the best predictors plus additional predictors with lower effects. The robustness and complementarity of the different methods are also studied. Compared to LR, non-linear models such as GBT or NN may provide robust complementary approaches to identify and classify genetic markers.
2045-2322
1-18
Romagnoni, Alberto
72db717c-5f06-4259-a8c9-2dd3a7233d7d
Jégou, Simon
42bb29cd-ca69-449b-8ddc-551052ca78d8
Van Steen, Kristel
030cf8ab-a1f5-4477-98a1-01d9e745e61d
Wainrib, Gilles
5427de70-c44b-4ce1-ab85-4ee70a9a10ef
Hugot, Jean-Pierre
55b3a010-0521-4671-8361-85eb7c716380
Eccles, Diana
5b59bc73-11c9-4cf0-a9d5-7a8e523eee23
International Inflammatory Bowel Disease Genetics Consortium (IIBDGC)
Romagnoni, Alberto
72db717c-5f06-4259-a8c9-2dd3a7233d7d
Jégou, Simon
42bb29cd-ca69-449b-8ddc-551052ca78d8
Van Steen, Kristel
030cf8ab-a1f5-4477-98a1-01d9e745e61d
Wainrib, Gilles
5427de70-c44b-4ce1-ab85-4ee70a9a10ef
Hugot, Jean-Pierre
55b3a010-0521-4671-8361-85eb7c716380
Eccles, Diana
5b59bc73-11c9-4cf0-a9d5-7a8e523eee23

Romagnoni, Alberto, Jégou, Simon, Van Steen, Kristel, Wainrib, Gilles and Hugot, Jean-Pierre , International Inflammatory Bowel Disease Genetics Consortium (IIBDGC) (2019) Comparative performances of machine learning methods for classifying Crohn Disease patients using genome-wide genotyping data. Scientific Reports, 9 (1), 1-18, [10351]. (doi:10.1038/s41598-019-46649-z).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Crohn Disease (CD) is a complex genetic disorder for which more than 140 genes have been identified using genome wide association studies (GWAS). However, the genetic architecture of the trait remains largely unknown. The recent development of machine learning (ML) approaches incited us to apply them to classify healthy and diseased people according to their genomic information. The Immunochip dataset containing 18,227 CD patients and 34,050 healthy controls enrolled and genotyped by the international Inflammatory Bowel Disease genetic consortium (IIBDGC) has been re-analyzed using a set of ML methods: penalized logistic regression (LR), gradient boosted trees (GBT) and artificial neural networks (NN). The main score used to compare the methods was the Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC) statistics. The impact of quality control (QC), imputing and coding methods on LR results showed that QC methods and imputation of missing genotypes may artificially increase the scores. At the opposite, neither the patient/control ratio nor marker preselection or coding strategies significantly affected the results. LR methods, including Lasso, Ridge and ElasticNet provided similar results with a maximum AUC of 0.80. GBT methods like XGBoost, LightGBM and CatBoost, together with dense NN with one or more hidden layers, provided similar AUC values, suggesting limited epistatic effects in the genetic architecture of the trait. ML methods detected near all the genetic variants previously identified by GWAS among the best predictors plus additional predictors with lower effects. The robustness and complementarity of the different methods are also studied. Compared to LR, non-linear models such as GBT or NN may provide robust complementary approaches to identify and classify genetic markers.

Text
s41598-019-46649-z - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (3MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 3 July 2019
e-pub ahead of print date: 17 July 2019

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 433031
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/433031
ISSN: 2045-2322
PURE UUID: b2bfbfcf-07ff-4b96-a576-a6d6ba8a1555
ORCID for Diana Eccles: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-9935-3169

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 07 Aug 2019 16:30
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 02:36

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Alberto Romagnoni
Author: Simon Jégou
Author: Kristel Van Steen
Author: Gilles Wainrib
Author: Jean-Pierre Hugot
Author: Diana Eccles ORCID iD
Corporate Author: International Inflammatory Bowel Disease Genetics Consortium (IIBDGC)

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×