The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A comparison of data-driven groundwater vulnerability assessment methods

A comparison of data-driven groundwater vulnerability assessment methods
A comparison of data-driven groundwater vulnerability assessment methods

Increasing availability of geo-environmental data has promoted the use of statistical methods to assess groundwater vulnerability. Nitrate is a widespread anthropogenic contaminant in groundwater and its occurrence can be used to identify aquifer settings vulnerable to contamination. In this study, multivariate Weights of Evidence (WofE) and Logistic Regression (LR) methods, where the response variable is binary, were used to evaluate the role and importance of a number of explanatory variables associated with nitrate sources and occurrence in groundwater in the Milan District (central part of the Po Plain, Italy). The results of these models have been used to map the spatial variation of groundwater vulnerability to nitrate in the region, and we compare the similarities and differences of their spatial patterns and associated explanatory variables. We modify the standard WofE method used in previous groundwater vulnerability studies to a form analogous to that used in LR; this provides a framework to compare the results of both models and reduces the effect of sampling bias on the results of the standard WofE model. In addition, a nonlinear Generalized Additive Model has been used to extend the LR analysis. Both approaches improved discrimination of the standard WofE and LR models, as measured by the c-statistic. Groundwater vulnerability probability outputs, based on rank-order classification of the respective model results, were similar in spatial patterns and identified similar strong explanatory variables associated with nitrate source (population density as a proxy for sewage systems and septic sources) and nitrate occurrence (groundwater depth).

0017-467X
866-879
Sorichetta, Alessandro
c80d941b-a3f5-4a6d-9a19-e3eeba84443c
Ballabio, Cristiano
6cd34adb-9ab2-4b39-a0c4-e5ddbd398071
Masetti, Marco
c3d261b3-da8c-4040-8fea-bc4389542c42
Robinson, Gilpin R.
c7fb5048-528e-485c-9687-e14d4fb2ab5c
Sterlacchini, Simone
0704090e-e01f-49f7-b19b-4d5f4a2661c8
Sorichetta, Alessandro
c80d941b-a3f5-4a6d-9a19-e3eeba84443c
Ballabio, Cristiano
6cd34adb-9ab2-4b39-a0c4-e5ddbd398071
Masetti, Marco
c3d261b3-da8c-4040-8fea-bc4389542c42
Robinson, Gilpin R.
c7fb5048-528e-485c-9687-e14d4fb2ab5c
Sterlacchini, Simone
0704090e-e01f-49f7-b19b-4d5f4a2661c8

Sorichetta, Alessandro, Ballabio, Cristiano, Masetti, Marco, Robinson, Gilpin R. and Sterlacchini, Simone (2013) A comparison of data-driven groundwater vulnerability assessment methods. Groundwater, 51 (6), 866-879. (doi:10.1111/gwat.12012).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Increasing availability of geo-environmental data has promoted the use of statistical methods to assess groundwater vulnerability. Nitrate is a widespread anthropogenic contaminant in groundwater and its occurrence can be used to identify aquifer settings vulnerable to contamination. In this study, multivariate Weights of Evidence (WofE) and Logistic Regression (LR) methods, where the response variable is binary, were used to evaluate the role and importance of a number of explanatory variables associated with nitrate sources and occurrence in groundwater in the Milan District (central part of the Po Plain, Italy). The results of these models have been used to map the spatial variation of groundwater vulnerability to nitrate in the region, and we compare the similarities and differences of their spatial patterns and associated explanatory variables. We modify the standard WofE method used in previous groundwater vulnerability studies to a form analogous to that used in LR; this provides a framework to compare the results of both models and reduces the effect of sampling bias on the results of the standard WofE model. In addition, a nonlinear Generalized Additive Model has been used to extend the LR analysis. Both approaches improved discrimination of the standard WofE and LR models, as measured by the c-statistic. Groundwater vulnerability probability outputs, based on rank-order classification of the respective model results, were similar in spatial patterns and identified similar strong explanatory variables associated with nitrate source (population density as a proxy for sewage systems and septic sources) and nitrate occurrence (groundwater depth).

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 3 January 2013
Published date: 1 November 2013

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 433087
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/433087
ISSN: 0017-467X
PURE UUID: 8e861d9c-cccd-47f8-91e5-1d7de10d800c
ORCID for Alessandro Sorichetta: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3576-5826

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 07 Aug 2019 16:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 03:08

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Cristiano Ballabio
Author: Marco Masetti
Author: Gilpin R. Robinson
Author: Simone Sterlacchini

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×