The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Refractory depression-cost-effectiveness of radically open dialectical behaviour therapy: findings of economic evaluation of RefraMED trial

Refractory depression-cost-effectiveness of radically open dialectical behaviour therapy: findings of economic evaluation of RefraMED trial
Refractory depression-cost-effectiveness of radically open dialectical behaviour therapy: findings of economic evaluation of RefraMED trial

Background Refractory depression is a major contributor to the economic burden of depression. Radically open dialectical behaviour therapy (RO DBT) is an unevaluated new treatment targeting overcontrolled personality, common in refractory depression, but it is not yet known whether the additional expense of RO DBT is good value for money.Aims To estimate the cost-effectiveness of RO DBT plus treatment as usual (TAU) compared with TAU alone in people with refractory depression (trial registration: ISRCTN85784627).Method We undertook a cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a randomised trial evaluating RO DBT plus TAU versus TAU alone for refractory depression in three UK secondary care centres. Our economic evaluation, 12 months after randomisation, adopted the perspective of the UK National Health Service (NHS) and personal social services. It evaluated cost-effectiveness by comparing the net cost of RO DBT with the net gain in quality-Adjusted life-years (QALYs), estimated using the EQ-5D-3L measure of health-related quality of life.Results The additional cost of RO DBT plus TAU compared with TAU alone was £7048 and was associated with a difference of 0.032 QALYs, yielding an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £220 250 per QALY. This ICER was well above the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) upper threshold of £30 000 per QALY. A cost-effectiveness acceptability curve indicated that RO DBT had a zero probability of being cost-effective compared with TAU at the NICE £30 000 threshold.Conclusions In its current resource-intensive form, RO DBT is not a cost-effective use of resources in the UK NHS.Declaration of interest R.H. is co-owner and director of Radically Open Ltd, the RO DBT training and dissemination company. D.K. reports grants outside the submitted work from the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). T.L. receives royalties from New Harbinger Publishing for sales of RO DBT treatment manuals, speaking fees from Radically Open Ltd, and a grant outside the submitted work from the Medical Research Council. He was co-director of Radically Open Ltd between November 2014 and May 2015 and is married to Erica Smith-Lynch, the principal shareholder and one of two directors of Radically Open Ltd. H.O'M. reports personal fees outside the submitted work from the Charlie Waller Institute and Improving Access to Psychological Therapy. S.R. provides RO DBT supervision through her company S C Rushbrook Ltd. I.R. reports grants outside the submitted work from NIHR and Health & Care Research Wales. M. Stanton reports personal fees outside the submitted work from British Isles DBT Training, Stanton Psychological Services Ltd and Taylor & Francis. M. Swales reports personal fees outside the submitted work from British Isles DBT Training, Guilford Press, Oxford University Press and Taylor & Francis. B.W. was co-director of Radically Open Ltd between November 2014 and February 2015.

chronic depression, cost-effectiveness analysis, radically open dialectical behaviour therapy (RO DBT), Refractory depression, treatment-resistant depression
1-8
Shearer, James
16811e55-6d5d-4779-8ba3-4af41260b710
Lynch, Thomas R.
29e90123-0aef-46c8-b320-1617fb48bb20
Chamba, Rampaul
085ed472-84cc-4a27-aa2d-bbf4969bd8c4
Clarke, Susan
48c5c3aa-db3f-4264-9ecc-0f4501597cf8
Hempel, Roelie J.
2dfa9856-74dd-49b5-86e6-f78eace6727f
Kingdon, David G.
14cdc422-10b4-4b2d-88ec-24fde5f4329b
O'Mahen, Heather
1738063f-7935-48a0-ad8e-0d8955b53b48
Remington, Bob
87f75b79-4207-4b3a-8ad0-a8e4b26c010f
Rushbrook, Sophie C.
74d92021-57df-4463-b0c6-d93a6f0cfb1f
Russell, Ian T.
2afa3303-c921-4c9d-b7a9-ff12da04ce3b
Stanton, Maggie
0b8d60d3-2bf5-4562-954e-95f27713f6e5
Swales, Michaela
4dea27a5-bfd2-49ec-a996-556e784cc469
Watkins, Alan
a9d13ba8-1de6-4917-863f-f4d8fb34e1e6
Whalley, Ben
e7183502-bda0-4189-aa14-3a681b4fc16d
Byford, Sarah
0778f700-ef50-4e37-b7e6-88063b7a0c49
Shearer, James
16811e55-6d5d-4779-8ba3-4af41260b710
Lynch, Thomas R.
29e90123-0aef-46c8-b320-1617fb48bb20
Chamba, Rampaul
085ed472-84cc-4a27-aa2d-bbf4969bd8c4
Clarke, Susan
48c5c3aa-db3f-4264-9ecc-0f4501597cf8
Hempel, Roelie J.
2dfa9856-74dd-49b5-86e6-f78eace6727f
Kingdon, David G.
14cdc422-10b4-4b2d-88ec-24fde5f4329b
O'Mahen, Heather
1738063f-7935-48a0-ad8e-0d8955b53b48
Remington, Bob
87f75b79-4207-4b3a-8ad0-a8e4b26c010f
Rushbrook, Sophie C.
74d92021-57df-4463-b0c6-d93a6f0cfb1f
Russell, Ian T.
2afa3303-c921-4c9d-b7a9-ff12da04ce3b
Stanton, Maggie
0b8d60d3-2bf5-4562-954e-95f27713f6e5
Swales, Michaela
4dea27a5-bfd2-49ec-a996-556e784cc469
Watkins, Alan
a9d13ba8-1de6-4917-863f-f4d8fb34e1e6
Whalley, Ben
e7183502-bda0-4189-aa14-3a681b4fc16d
Byford, Sarah
0778f700-ef50-4e37-b7e6-88063b7a0c49

Shearer, James, Lynch, Thomas R., Chamba, Rampaul, Clarke, Susan, Hempel, Roelie J., Kingdon, David G., O'Mahen, Heather, Remington, Bob, Rushbrook, Sophie C., Russell, Ian T., Stanton, Maggie, Swales, Michaela, Watkins, Alan, Whalley, Ben and Byford, Sarah (2019) Refractory depression-cost-effectiveness of radically open dialectical behaviour therapy: findings of economic evaluation of RefraMED trial. BJPsych Open, 5 (5), 1-8, [e64]. (doi:10.1192/bjo.2019.57).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background Refractory depression is a major contributor to the economic burden of depression. Radically open dialectical behaviour therapy (RO DBT) is an unevaluated new treatment targeting overcontrolled personality, common in refractory depression, but it is not yet known whether the additional expense of RO DBT is good value for money.Aims To estimate the cost-effectiveness of RO DBT plus treatment as usual (TAU) compared with TAU alone in people with refractory depression (trial registration: ISRCTN85784627).Method We undertook a cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a randomised trial evaluating RO DBT plus TAU versus TAU alone for refractory depression in three UK secondary care centres. Our economic evaluation, 12 months after randomisation, adopted the perspective of the UK National Health Service (NHS) and personal social services. It evaluated cost-effectiveness by comparing the net cost of RO DBT with the net gain in quality-Adjusted life-years (QALYs), estimated using the EQ-5D-3L measure of health-related quality of life.Results The additional cost of RO DBT plus TAU compared with TAU alone was £7048 and was associated with a difference of 0.032 QALYs, yielding an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £220 250 per QALY. This ICER was well above the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) upper threshold of £30 000 per QALY. A cost-effectiveness acceptability curve indicated that RO DBT had a zero probability of being cost-effective compared with TAU at the NICE £30 000 threshold.Conclusions In its current resource-intensive form, RO DBT is not a cost-effective use of resources in the UK NHS.Declaration of interest R.H. is co-owner and director of Radically Open Ltd, the RO DBT training and dissemination company. D.K. reports grants outside the submitted work from the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). T.L. receives royalties from New Harbinger Publishing for sales of RO DBT treatment manuals, speaking fees from Radically Open Ltd, and a grant outside the submitted work from the Medical Research Council. He was co-director of Radically Open Ltd between November 2014 and May 2015 and is married to Erica Smith-Lynch, the principal shareholder and one of two directors of Radically Open Ltd. H.O'M. reports personal fees outside the submitted work from the Charlie Waller Institute and Improving Access to Psychological Therapy. S.R. provides RO DBT supervision through her company S C Rushbrook Ltd. I.R. reports grants outside the submitted work from NIHR and Health & Care Research Wales. M. Stanton reports personal fees outside the submitted work from British Isles DBT Training, Stanton Psychological Services Ltd and Taylor & Francis. M. Swales reports personal fees outside the submitted work from British Isles DBT Training, Guilford Press, Oxford University Press and Taylor & Francis. B.W. was co-director of Radically Open Ltd between November 2014 and February 2015.

Text
refractory depression cost effectiveness of radically open dialectical behaviour therapy findings of economic evaluation of reframed trial - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (450kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 7 July 2019
e-pub ahead of print date: 29 July 2019
Published date: 1 September 2019
Keywords: chronic depression, cost-effectiveness analysis, radically open dialectical behaviour therapy (RO DBT), Refractory depression, treatment-resistant depression

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 433136
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/433136
PURE UUID: 06d73627-c6b0-4415-8b07-4db8097c35df
ORCID for Thomas R. Lynch: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1270-6097

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 09 Aug 2019 16:30
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 03:11

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: James Shearer
Author: Thomas R. Lynch ORCID iD
Author: Rampaul Chamba
Author: Susan Clarke
Author: Roelie J. Hempel
Author: David G. Kingdon
Author: Heather O'Mahen
Author: Bob Remington
Author: Sophie C. Rushbrook
Author: Ian T. Russell
Author: Maggie Stanton
Author: Michaela Swales
Author: Alan Watkins
Author: Ben Whalley
Author: Sarah Byford

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×