The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Scaling up a polypharmacy Action Learning Sets tool: interim findings and methodological insights

Scaling up a polypharmacy Action Learning Sets tool: interim findings and methodological insights
Scaling up a polypharmacy Action Learning Sets tool: interim findings and methodological insights
Background

In line with national policy, to address the issues associated with inappropriate polypharmacy, the Centre for Implementation Science are evaluating the implementation of a Wessex Academic Health Science Network led Action Learning Sets (ALS) tool, to improve healthcare practitioners’ confidence, perceptions and experiences of stopping inappropriate medicines safely.

Methods

Up to 125 healthcare practitioners attending ALS across three localities in the South of England are being invited to participate in the study. A mixed method approach involving pre-post ALS questionnaires, evaluation forms and observational methods, will be used to evaluate the study.

To date, interim findings have been analysed from one locality (n=33), and methodological insights recorded which relate to the prospective scale up and evaluation of the ALS across two further localities. Quantitative paired pre-post ALS questionnaire responses were analysed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, whilst qualitative data were analysed using thematic analysis and ethnographic methods. Overall impact of the ALS will be evaluated using Kirkpatrick’s evaluation model.

Results

Interim findings show the ALS has contributed to improving perceptions, confidence and experiences in addressing polypharmacy and more specifically perceptions of; stopping inappropriate medicines, use of knowledge, information and tools, shared decision making with patients/clinicians and the role of institutional factors. Methodological insights relating to the scale-up of the ALS across two further localities include the impact of locality upon participation, as well as the process of engagement of participants in the evaluation.

Conclusion

Interim findings and methodological insights in scaling up the study may be of relevance to national policy to understand how to address polypharmacy issues in different localities.
1748-5908
Brooks, Cindy
8a2fcddf-44b1-4f74-a14f-d877dddf58bd
Argyropoulos, Anastasios
ec3a2bdc-92b6-49a8-b80c-9dd3c3073c11
Matheson, Catherine
609d16bf-fe81-4fcd-8f6c-91431c55a9fc
Guerrero-Luduena, Richard
db129ad5-e7f4-427c-b834-34fd22d67537
Kryl, David
59a96168-a261-49c8-9c40-d124f6c83daf
George, Ruth
0f7534e0-39cf-422d-b367-32d58eb859f3
Rowse, Vicki
f6fd2cdb-4fb9-4015-887c-5958bd093188
Howard, Clare
0c176f99-dbed-4af8-8134-9f6d8b855137
Brooks, Cindy
8a2fcddf-44b1-4f74-a14f-d877dddf58bd
Argyropoulos, Anastasios
ec3a2bdc-92b6-49a8-b80c-9dd3c3073c11
Matheson, Catherine
609d16bf-fe81-4fcd-8f6c-91431c55a9fc
Guerrero-Luduena, Richard
db129ad5-e7f4-427c-b834-34fd22d67537
Kryl, David
59a96168-a261-49c8-9c40-d124f6c83daf
George, Ruth
0f7534e0-39cf-422d-b367-32d58eb859f3
Rowse, Vicki
f6fd2cdb-4fb9-4015-887c-5958bd093188
Howard, Clare
0c176f99-dbed-4af8-8134-9f6d8b855137

Brooks, Cindy, Argyropoulos, Anastasios, Matheson, Catherine, Guerrero-Luduena, Richard, Kryl, David, George, Ruth, Rowse, Vicki and Howard, Clare (2019) Scaling up a polypharmacy Action Learning Sets tool: interim findings and methodological insights. Implementation Science, 14 (Suuplement 2). (doi:10.1186/s13012-019-0911-5).

Record type: Meeting abstract

Abstract

Background

In line with national policy, to address the issues associated with inappropriate polypharmacy, the Centre for Implementation Science are evaluating the implementation of a Wessex Academic Health Science Network led Action Learning Sets (ALS) tool, to improve healthcare practitioners’ confidence, perceptions and experiences of stopping inappropriate medicines safely.

Methods

Up to 125 healthcare practitioners attending ALS across three localities in the South of England are being invited to participate in the study. A mixed method approach involving pre-post ALS questionnaires, evaluation forms and observational methods, will be used to evaluate the study.

To date, interim findings have been analysed from one locality (n=33), and methodological insights recorded which relate to the prospective scale up and evaluation of the ALS across two further localities. Quantitative paired pre-post ALS questionnaire responses were analysed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, whilst qualitative data were analysed using thematic analysis and ethnographic methods. Overall impact of the ALS will be evaluated using Kirkpatrick’s evaluation model.

Results

Interim findings show the ALS has contributed to improving perceptions, confidence and experiences in addressing polypharmacy and more specifically perceptions of; stopping inappropriate medicines, use of knowledge, information and tools, shared decision making with patients/clinicians and the role of institutional factors. Methodological insights relating to the scale-up of the ALS across two further localities include the impact of locality upon participation, as well as the process of engagement of participants in the evaluation.

Conclusion

Interim findings and methodological insights in scaling up the study may be of relevance to national policy to understand how to address polypharmacy issues in different localities.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2019

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 433143
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/433143
ISSN: 1748-5908
PURE UUID: 2af06dbf-aba5-4224-b2e8-b735b3edb3af
ORCID for Cindy Brooks: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-0022-2100
ORCID for Richard Guerrero-Luduena: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-1217-015X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 09 Aug 2019 16:30
Last modified: 09 Nov 2024 02:53

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Cindy Brooks ORCID iD
Author: David Kryl
Author: Ruth George
Author: Vicki Rowse
Author: Clare Howard

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×