The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Reappraisal and suppression emotion-regulation tendencies differentially predict reward-responsivity and psychological well-being

Reappraisal and suppression emotion-regulation tendencies differentially predict reward-responsivity and psychological well-being
Reappraisal and suppression emotion-regulation tendencies differentially predict reward-responsivity and psychological well-being
Individuals who suppress their emotions experience less positive emotions, worse relationships, and a reduced quality of life whereas those who tend to reappraise show an opposite pattern. Despite this divergent pattern, few have asked how the use of these emotion-regulation strategies relates to reward responsivity. We predicted that elevated suppression would be associated with blunted reward responsivity, whereas reappraisal would be associated with elevated reward responsivity. To test this hypothesis, participants completed a measure of individual differences in emotion-regulation strategies, measures of self-reported reward responsivity, and then a reward time-estimation task (Kotani et al., 2003) while electroencephalography (EEG) was recorded. Results revealed that individual differences in cognitive reappraisal were unrelated to self-report measures of reward responsivity, whereas suppression was associated with blunted reward responsivity. At the neural level, reappraisal was associated with greater attention to the rewarding cues, as indexed by the P300 event-related potential (ERP) component, whereas suppression was related to blunted reward anticipation, as indexed by the stimulus-preceding negativity (SPN) ERP component. Suppression prospectively predicted worse psychological well-being 2.5 years later and blunted neural reward anticipation partially explained this association. Taken together with past research, these results suggest reappraisal tendencies may lead to better outcomes due, in part, to enhanced reward responsivity, whereas the negative consequences of suppression may be associated with blunted reward responsivity.
0301-0511
35-47
Kelley, Nicholas
445e767b-ad9f-44f2-b2c6-d981482bb90b
Glazer, James
01e2422a-474b-4973-b536-f4dcede19b13
Pornpattananangkul, Narun
c02d2de1-2b26-47bf-acbf-f94b0fa77ca8
Nusslock, Robin
e254120f-5efa-4ab7-81c6-5f85d510aaee
Kelley, Nicholas
445e767b-ad9f-44f2-b2c6-d981482bb90b
Glazer, James
01e2422a-474b-4973-b536-f4dcede19b13
Pornpattananangkul, Narun
c02d2de1-2b26-47bf-acbf-f94b0fa77ca8
Nusslock, Robin
e254120f-5efa-4ab7-81c6-5f85d510aaee

Kelley, Nicholas, Glazer, James, Pornpattananangkul, Narun and Nusslock, Robin (2019) Reappraisal and suppression emotion-regulation tendencies differentially predict reward-responsivity and psychological well-being. Biological Psychology, 140 (1), 35-47. (doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2018.11.005).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Individuals who suppress their emotions experience less positive emotions, worse relationships, and a reduced quality of life whereas those who tend to reappraise show an opposite pattern. Despite this divergent pattern, few have asked how the use of these emotion-regulation strategies relates to reward responsivity. We predicted that elevated suppression would be associated with blunted reward responsivity, whereas reappraisal would be associated with elevated reward responsivity. To test this hypothesis, participants completed a measure of individual differences in emotion-regulation strategies, measures of self-reported reward responsivity, and then a reward time-estimation task (Kotani et al., 2003) while electroencephalography (EEG) was recorded. Results revealed that individual differences in cognitive reappraisal were unrelated to self-report measures of reward responsivity, whereas suppression was associated with blunted reward responsivity. At the neural level, reappraisal was associated with greater attention to the rewarding cues, as indexed by the P300 event-related potential (ERP) component, whereas suppression was related to blunted reward anticipation, as indexed by the stimulus-preceding negativity (SPN) ERP component. Suppression prospectively predicted worse psychological well-being 2.5 years later and blunted neural reward anticipation partially explained this association. Taken together with past research, these results suggest reappraisal tendencies may lead to better outcomes due, in part, to enhanced reward responsivity, whereas the negative consequences of suppression may be associated with blunted reward responsivity.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 17 November 2018
e-pub ahead of print date: 20 November 2018
Published date: January 2019

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 433252
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/433252
ISSN: 0301-0511
PURE UUID: 76fe4949-8781-41ad-aad0-4c09608b7c57
ORCID for Nicholas Kelley: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2256-0597

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 12 Aug 2019 16:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 04:41

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Nicholas Kelley ORCID iD
Author: James Glazer
Author: Narun Pornpattananangkul
Author: Robin Nusslock

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×