Donor and post-transplant ureteroscopy for stone disease in patients with renal transplant: evidence from a systematic review
Donor and post-transplant ureteroscopy for stone disease in patients with renal transplant: evidence from a systematic review
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Renal transplant is needed for end-stage renal disease. Although treatment of donor stones may be needed pretransplant and increases the pool available for renal transplant, posttransplant stone disease may also need treatment to maintain the allograft function. A Cochrane style review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines to evaluate the outcomes of donor and posttransplant ureteroscopy (URS) for stone disease, including all English language articles between January 1996 and December 2018.
RECENT FINDINGS: Eighteen articles (167 patients), seven ex-vivo or donor URS and 11 posttransplant URS met inclusion criteria and were included in the review. A pretransplant URS showed a stone-free rate (SFR) of 100% with an overall complication rate of 7.5% (four Clavien I and one Clavien ≥3), where as a posttransplant URS showed SFR of 100% in five studies and 60-91% in four studies with an overall complication rate of 12.9% (10 Clavien I and three Clavien ≥3).
SUMMARY: Advancements in endourological technique has made URS for donor and posttransplant urolithiasis a safe and effective procedure. Although data were based on small retrospective caser series, it shows that in experienced centres it can be performed with low morbidity and a high SFR.
548-555
Reeves, Thomas
ca098034-410b-4776-a704-dd88b89cc594
Agarwal, Vineet
772734be-4216-48cc-92f8-18e6e199efba
Somani, Bhaskar K
ab5fd1ce-02df-4b88-b25e-8ece396335d9
September 2019
Reeves, Thomas
ca098034-410b-4776-a704-dd88b89cc594
Agarwal, Vineet
772734be-4216-48cc-92f8-18e6e199efba
Somani, Bhaskar K
ab5fd1ce-02df-4b88-b25e-8ece396335d9
Reeves, Thomas, Agarwal, Vineet and Somani, Bhaskar K
(2019)
Donor and post-transplant ureteroscopy for stone disease in patients with renal transplant: evidence from a systematic review.
Current Opinion in Urology, 29 (5), .
(doi:10.1097/MOU.0000000000000618).
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Renal transplant is needed for end-stage renal disease. Although treatment of donor stones may be needed pretransplant and increases the pool available for renal transplant, posttransplant stone disease may also need treatment to maintain the allograft function. A Cochrane style review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines to evaluate the outcomes of donor and posttransplant ureteroscopy (URS) for stone disease, including all English language articles between January 1996 and December 2018.
RECENT FINDINGS: Eighteen articles (167 patients), seven ex-vivo or donor URS and 11 posttransplant URS met inclusion criteria and were included in the review. A pretransplant URS showed a stone-free rate (SFR) of 100% with an overall complication rate of 7.5% (four Clavien I and one Clavien ≥3), where as a posttransplant URS showed SFR of 100% in five studies and 60-91% in four studies with an overall complication rate of 12.9% (10 Clavien I and three Clavien ≥3).
SUMMARY: Advancements in endourological technique has made URS for donor and posttransplant urolithiasis a safe and effective procedure. Although data were based on small retrospective caser series, it shows that in experienced centres it can be performed with low morbidity and a high SFR.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
e-pub ahead of print date: 13 March 2019
Published date: September 2019
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 433290
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/433290
ISSN: 0963-0643
PURE UUID: 3948fd9e-4ad5-44da-a603-21c201561af6
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 13 Aug 2019 16:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 03:24
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Thomas Reeves
Author:
Vineet Agarwal
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics