The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Predictors and results of negative ureteroscopy for treatment of consecutive ureteric stones done as a primary procedure: Prospective outcomes from a University Hospital

Predictors and results of negative ureteroscopy for treatment of consecutive ureteric stones done as a primary procedure: Prospective outcomes from a University Hospital
Predictors and results of negative ureteroscopy for treatment of consecutive ureteric stones done as a primary procedure: Prospective outcomes from a University Hospital

INTRODUCTION: While negative ureteroscopy (URS) can be considered as an unnecessary procedure with medico-legal consequences, this avoids radiation from repeat CT scan and sometimes may be the only way to reassure patients with ongoing symptoms. We wanted to analyze our predictors and results of negative URS for treatment of ureteric stones.

METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between March 2012 and August 2018, data on consecutive patients with ureteric stones undergoing a primary URS (without a pre-operative stent) were prospectively collected for patient demographics and outcomes. Comparison was done for patients with diagnostic and therapeutic primary URS for ureteric stones. Patients with renal stones were excluded from the study.

RESULTS: A total of 270 patients underwent URS for ureteric stones during the study period of which 35 (13%) had a negative diagnostic URS. The patients who had negative URS were younger (p = 0.001), had smaller stones (p < 0.001), and more stones located in the distal ureter or vesico-ureteric junction (VUJ; p= 0.036). None of the patients who underwent negative URS had a postoperative stent inserted or any complications.

CONCLUSION: Although the rates of negative URS should be as low as possible, it seems to be safe and reassures patients with on-going symptoms. Based on our data, patients with small distal ureteric or VUJ stones should undergo a repeat imaging to avoid this unnecessary procedure. Informed consent, patient counseling, and appropriate up-to-date imaging seem to be key to minimizing negative diagnostic URS.

0042-1138
1-6
Prattley, Sarah
fe166d46-f5d3-4d84-838f-10eee44f85d5
Rice, Patrick
683deec4-9123-4886-9b93-e0cf8d9e67f8
Pietropaolo, Amelia
dd6770c4-bf2e-46a9-b7a2-7bd3f9fdba56
Geraghty, Robert
ef19149e-530f-4749-9740-0902fed96fe1
Babawale, Omikunle
9fe51379-b029-49f5-842f-0f21571659c6
Somani, Bhaskar K.
ab5fd1ce-02df-4b88-b25e-8ece396335d9
Prattley, Sarah
fe166d46-f5d3-4d84-838f-10eee44f85d5
Rice, Patrick
683deec4-9123-4886-9b93-e0cf8d9e67f8
Pietropaolo, Amelia
dd6770c4-bf2e-46a9-b7a2-7bd3f9fdba56
Geraghty, Robert
ef19149e-530f-4749-9740-0902fed96fe1
Babawale, Omikunle
9fe51379-b029-49f5-842f-0f21571659c6
Somani, Bhaskar K.
ab5fd1ce-02df-4b88-b25e-8ece396335d9

Prattley, Sarah, Rice, Patrick, Pietropaolo, Amelia, Geraghty, Robert, Babawale, Omikunle and Somani, Bhaskar K. (2019) Predictors and results of negative ureteroscopy for treatment of consecutive ureteric stones done as a primary procedure: Prospective outcomes from a University Hospital. Urologia Internationalis, 103 (2), 1-6. (doi:10.1159/000501658).

Record type: Article

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: While negative ureteroscopy (URS) can be considered as an unnecessary procedure with medico-legal consequences, this avoids radiation from repeat CT scan and sometimes may be the only way to reassure patients with ongoing symptoms. We wanted to analyze our predictors and results of negative URS for treatment of ureteric stones.

METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between March 2012 and August 2018, data on consecutive patients with ureteric stones undergoing a primary URS (without a pre-operative stent) were prospectively collected for patient demographics and outcomes. Comparison was done for patients with diagnostic and therapeutic primary URS for ureteric stones. Patients with renal stones were excluded from the study.

RESULTS: A total of 270 patients underwent URS for ureteric stones during the study period of which 35 (13%) had a negative diagnostic URS. The patients who had negative URS were younger (p = 0.001), had smaller stones (p < 0.001), and more stones located in the distal ureter or vesico-ureteric junction (VUJ; p= 0.036). None of the patients who underwent negative URS had a postoperative stent inserted or any complications.

CONCLUSION: Although the rates of negative URS should be as low as possible, it seems to be safe and reassures patients with on-going symptoms. Based on our data, patients with small distal ureteric or VUJ stones should undergo a repeat imaging to avoid this unnecessary procedure. Informed consent, patient counseling, and appropriate up-to-date imaging seem to be key to minimizing negative diagnostic URS.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 21 June 2019
e-pub ahead of print date: 10 July 2019
Published date: August 2019

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 433292
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/433292
ISSN: 0042-1138
PURE UUID: 3881cbfd-adc7-42c9-89cb-ed7d5f739db8

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 13 Aug 2019 16:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 03:23

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Sarah Prattley
Author: Patrick Rice
Author: Amelia Pietropaolo
Author: Robert Geraghty
Author: Omikunle Babawale

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×