The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Level of knowledge on radiation exposure and compliance to wearing protective equipment: where do endourologists stand? An ESUT/EULIS survey

Level of knowledge on radiation exposure and compliance to wearing protective equipment: where do endourologists stand? An ESUT/EULIS survey
Level of knowledge on radiation exposure and compliance to wearing protective equipment: where do endourologists stand? An ESUT/EULIS survey

PURPOSE: Fluoroscopy is valuable in modern endourology. We present the results of a survey where compliance to radiation safety measures was tested according to surgical exposure, and level of understanding of the radiation rules and risks associated with it.

METHODS: A 52-item, anonymous questionnaire, structured by 6 ESUT/EULIS experts was distributed at 3 different endourological meetings during 2017-2018. Main aim was to evaluate level of knowledge on radiation physics and the protective measures taken against radiation exposure by participants. Fisher's exact test, Kruskal-Wallis test and ROC curve were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS: 211 responses were evaluated. Number of correct answers (median 7.00) differed significantly according to age (p = 0.001), working position (p = 0.005), working field (p < 0.001), number of semirigid (p < 0.001)/flexible URS (p < 0.001) and PNL (p < 0.001) performed per year. Physicians aged 50-60 years, consultants, academics and those who performed more procedures achieved higher scores. In our study 51.7% of responders used shields in the operating room, 89.6% wore lead aprons, 84.4% thyroid shields, while glasses and gloves were used by 14.7% and 8.1%, respectively. Age, working field and number of correct answers did not affect significantly the use of protection in contrast with endourology fellowship training, working position and lessons on radiation. Interestingly, residents, untrained endourologists and those who were provided with lessons on radiation were more compliant.

CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed that majority of modern urologists advocate radiation protection during endourology practice. Senior consultants and academic urologists performing a high volume of procedures seem to understand physics and rules of radiation use.

0724-4983
1-8
Tzelves, Lazaros
34525a34-b65e-4a88-9a5d-cd70af8533ce
Somani, Bhaskar
ab5fd1ce-02df-4b88-b25e-8ece396335d9
Knoll, Thomas
67d55189-714e-4a74-9cb6-44b3fa05114e
Kamphuis, Guido
8479e4b3-ccdf-4841-b1d5-52f3b29d1c7b
Sarica, Kemal
19e388bc-ed93-42f8-8756-62e7d46dbf08
Seitz, C.
7bd581da-15da-4893-8275-a23291ff6471
Liatsikos, E.
8b245ec0-0978-4b72-becd-7f1f8f6c868c
Skolarikos, Andreas
7308ae8f-62d1-4ce6-9e66-d8c4c80294ad
Tzelves, Lazaros
34525a34-b65e-4a88-9a5d-cd70af8533ce
Somani, Bhaskar
ab5fd1ce-02df-4b88-b25e-8ece396335d9
Knoll, Thomas
67d55189-714e-4a74-9cb6-44b3fa05114e
Kamphuis, Guido
8479e4b3-ccdf-4841-b1d5-52f3b29d1c7b
Sarica, Kemal
19e388bc-ed93-42f8-8756-62e7d46dbf08
Seitz, C.
7bd581da-15da-4893-8275-a23291ff6471
Liatsikos, E.
8b245ec0-0978-4b72-becd-7f1f8f6c868c
Skolarikos, Andreas
7308ae8f-62d1-4ce6-9e66-d8c4c80294ad

Tzelves, Lazaros, Somani, Bhaskar, Knoll, Thomas, Kamphuis, Guido, Sarica, Kemal, Seitz, C., Liatsikos, E. and Skolarikos, Andreas (2019) Level of knowledge on radiation exposure and compliance to wearing protective equipment: where do endourologists stand? An ESUT/EULIS survey. World Journal of Urology, 1-8. (doi:10.1007/s00345-019-02807-6).

Record type: Article

Abstract

PURPOSE: Fluoroscopy is valuable in modern endourology. We present the results of a survey where compliance to radiation safety measures was tested according to surgical exposure, and level of understanding of the radiation rules and risks associated with it.

METHODS: A 52-item, anonymous questionnaire, structured by 6 ESUT/EULIS experts was distributed at 3 different endourological meetings during 2017-2018. Main aim was to evaluate level of knowledge on radiation physics and the protective measures taken against radiation exposure by participants. Fisher's exact test, Kruskal-Wallis test and ROC curve were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS: 211 responses were evaluated. Number of correct answers (median 7.00) differed significantly according to age (p = 0.001), working position (p = 0.005), working field (p < 0.001), number of semirigid (p < 0.001)/flexible URS (p < 0.001) and PNL (p < 0.001) performed per year. Physicians aged 50-60 years, consultants, academics and those who performed more procedures achieved higher scores. In our study 51.7% of responders used shields in the operating room, 89.6% wore lead aprons, 84.4% thyroid shields, while glasses and gloves were used by 14.7% and 8.1%, respectively. Age, working field and number of correct answers did not affect significantly the use of protection in contrast with endourology fellowship training, working position and lessons on radiation. Interestingly, residents, untrained endourologists and those who were provided with lessons on radiation were more compliant.

CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed that majority of modern urologists advocate radiation protection during endourology practice. Senior consultants and academic urologists performing a high volume of procedures seem to understand physics and rules of radiation use.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 10 May 2019
e-pub ahead of print date: 15 May 2019

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 433342
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/433342
ISSN: 0724-4983
PURE UUID: 3ee58454-5874-420b-8239-9df568a6ac9b

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 14 Aug 2019 16:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 03:23

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Lazaros Tzelves
Author: Bhaskar Somani
Author: Thomas Knoll
Author: Guido Kamphuis
Author: Kemal Sarica
Author: C. Seitz
Author: E. Liatsikos
Author: Andreas Skolarikos

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×