Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injuries at vaginal birth after caesarean: a retrospective cohort study
Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injuries at vaginal birth after caesarean: a retrospective cohort study
Introduction and hypothesis: Vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) is associated with an increased risk of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS). However, specific factors that influence the risk of OASIS at VBAC have not been studied, particularly whether there are specific baseline characteristics of the first delivery which affect the subsequent perineal outcomes.
Methods: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from University of Southampton NHS Foundation Trusts’ maternity database. This included secundiparous women with a previous caesarean delivery (CS) who achieved a singleton, term, cephalic vaginal delivery from 2004 to 2014. Univariate analysis compared maternal, intrapartum and neonatal factors of those who suffered OASIS at VBAC with those who did not. A binary logistic regression model calculated the adjusted, independent odds ratio (OR) of OASIS.
Results: A total of 1375 women met the inclusion criteria. The OASIS rate was 8.1%, a 1.4-fold increase compared with primiparous women [difference 2.4% (95% CI 1.1, 3.6)]. Those sustaining OASIS at VBAC were older (p = 0.011) and had infants of greater birth weight at initial caesarean (p < 0.001) and VBAC (p = 0.04). Analysis of odds ratios revealed that mediolateral episiotomy (MLE) at VBAC halved the risk of OASIS [37.5% VBAC with OASIS vs. 52.2% VBAC without OASIS (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.32–0.81)], whereas an urgent CS at initial delivery doubled the risk [52.3% VBAC with OASIS vs. 34.9% VBAC without OASIS (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.31–3.21)].
Conclusions: Advanced maternal age, increased infant birth weight and an urgent category of initial CS increase the risk of OASIS at VBAC, whereas MLE is protective.
Mediolateral episiotomy (MLE), Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS), Perineal trauma, Vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC)
1-7
D’Souza, Joanna C.
714419e4-b3a9-42cf-9838-913b880ced88
Monga, Ash
60b415bd-97b3-485b-b641-0751151036d3
Tincello, Douglas G.
6dcd9583-06ff-46f0-8e2c-c1fc338734d9
D’Souza, Joanna C.
714419e4-b3a9-42cf-9838-913b880ced88
Monga, Ash
60b415bd-97b3-485b-b641-0751151036d3
Tincello, Douglas G.
6dcd9583-06ff-46f0-8e2c-c1fc338734d9
D’Souza, Joanna C., Monga, Ash and Tincello, Douglas G.
(2019)
Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injuries at vaginal birth after caesarean: a retrospective cohort study.
International Urogynecology Journal, .
(doi:10.1007/s00192-019-03978-x).
Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis: Vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) is associated with an increased risk of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS). However, specific factors that influence the risk of OASIS at VBAC have not been studied, particularly whether there are specific baseline characteristics of the first delivery which affect the subsequent perineal outcomes.
Methods: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from University of Southampton NHS Foundation Trusts’ maternity database. This included secundiparous women with a previous caesarean delivery (CS) who achieved a singleton, term, cephalic vaginal delivery from 2004 to 2014. Univariate analysis compared maternal, intrapartum and neonatal factors of those who suffered OASIS at VBAC with those who did not. A binary logistic regression model calculated the adjusted, independent odds ratio (OR) of OASIS.
Results: A total of 1375 women met the inclusion criteria. The OASIS rate was 8.1%, a 1.4-fold increase compared with primiparous women [difference 2.4% (95% CI 1.1, 3.6)]. Those sustaining OASIS at VBAC were older (p = 0.011) and had infants of greater birth weight at initial caesarean (p < 0.001) and VBAC (p = 0.04). Analysis of odds ratios revealed that mediolateral episiotomy (MLE) at VBAC halved the risk of OASIS [37.5% VBAC with OASIS vs. 52.2% VBAC without OASIS (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.32–0.81)], whereas an urgent CS at initial delivery doubled the risk [52.3% VBAC with OASIS vs. 34.9% VBAC without OASIS (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.31–3.21)].
Conclusions: Advanced maternal age, increased infant birth weight and an urgent category of initial CS increase the risk of OASIS at VBAC, whereas MLE is protective.
Text
DSouza2019_Article_RiskFactorsForObstetricAnalSph
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 3 May 2019
e-pub ahead of print date: 2 July 2019
Keywords:
Mediolateral episiotomy (MLE), Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS), Perineal trauma, Vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC)
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 433398
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/433398
ISSN: 0937-3462
PURE UUID: 27fe37be-96a4-4014-bbac-5bdea09b08d1
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 20 Aug 2019 16:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 03:39
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Joanna C. D’Souza
Author:
Ash Monga
Author:
Douglas G. Tincello
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics