The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Challenges of retrograde ureteroscopy in patients with urinary diversion: Outcomes and lessons learnt from a systematic review of literature

Challenges of retrograde ureteroscopy in patients with urinary diversion: Outcomes and lessons learnt from a systematic review of literature
Challenges of retrograde ureteroscopy in patients with urinary diversion: Outcomes and lessons learnt from a systematic review of literature

INTRODUCTION: Retrograde ureteroscopy (URS) can be safely and successfully performed in patients who have had previous urinary diversion (UD). With broadening indications and advances in technology, URS can be used in complex cases. In this review article, we have summarized the relevant published literature regarding the outcomes and challenges encountered during retrograde URS in patients with UD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of literature according to Cochrane and preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis guidelines for all studies reporting on retrograde URS from inception to September 2017. A literature search was conducted through MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane library for all English language articles.

RESULTS: Our literature search identified 6 retrospective studies. In total, 125 patients with a mean age of 67 years (range 28-90 years) underwent retrograde URS (190 procedures) after UD for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. The main indications included upper urinary tract filling defects (due to either intrinsic pathology or extrinsic compression), strictures due to ureteral thickening, stone disease, and surveillance for suspected malignancy. The success rate and complications across the studies varied from 56 to 80% and 0 to 44% respectively, with most complications being Clavien I in nature.

CONCLUSION: Retrograde URS can be technically challenging due to ureteric cannulation, strictures, and anatomical variations. However, there is very little evidence currently available on this topic with data based on retrospective case series. In experienced hands, it seems to be relatively successful with a low risk of major complications.

Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Constriction, Pathologic, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Treatment Outcome, Ureter, Ureteroscopy/methods, Urinary Diversion/adverse effects, Urology/methods
0042-1138
249-255
Ramachandra, Meghana N.
15d4c76e-137c-444b-98a1-c5606847783e
Somani, Bhaskar K.
ab5fd1ce-02df-4b88-b25e-8ece396335d9
Ramachandra, Meghana N.
15d4c76e-137c-444b-98a1-c5606847783e
Somani, Bhaskar K.
ab5fd1ce-02df-4b88-b25e-8ece396335d9

Ramachandra, Meghana N. and Somani, Bhaskar K. (2018) Challenges of retrograde ureteroscopy in patients with urinary diversion: Outcomes and lessons learnt from a systematic review of literature. Urologia Internationalis, 101 (3), 249-255. (doi:10.1159/000488325).

Record type: Article

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Retrograde ureteroscopy (URS) can be safely and successfully performed in patients who have had previous urinary diversion (UD). With broadening indications and advances in technology, URS can be used in complex cases. In this review article, we have summarized the relevant published literature regarding the outcomes and challenges encountered during retrograde URS in patients with UD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of literature according to Cochrane and preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis guidelines for all studies reporting on retrograde URS from inception to September 2017. A literature search was conducted through MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane library for all English language articles.

RESULTS: Our literature search identified 6 retrospective studies. In total, 125 patients with a mean age of 67 years (range 28-90 years) underwent retrograde URS (190 procedures) after UD for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. The main indications included upper urinary tract filling defects (due to either intrinsic pathology or extrinsic compression), strictures due to ureteral thickening, stone disease, and surveillance for suspected malignancy. The success rate and complications across the studies varied from 56 to 80% and 0 to 44% respectively, with most complications being Clavien I in nature.

CONCLUSION: Retrograde URS can be technically challenging due to ureteric cannulation, strictures, and anatomical variations. However, there is very little evidence currently available on this topic with data based on retrospective case series. In experienced hands, it seems to be relatively successful with a low risk of major complications.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 9 March 2018
e-pub ahead of print date: 3 April 2018
Published date: October 2018
Keywords: Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Constriction, Pathologic, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Treatment Outcome, Ureter, Ureteroscopy/methods, Urinary Diversion/adverse effects, Urology/methods

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 433447
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/433447
ISSN: 0042-1138
PURE UUID: eecbb75e-76a7-461b-8bc6-fec306f63638

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 22 Aug 2019 16:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 03:24

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Meghana N. Ramachandra

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×