The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A method to evaluate trainee progression during simulation training at the Urology Simulation Boot Camp (USBC) Course

A method to evaluate trainee progression during simulation training at the Urology Simulation Boot Camp (USBC) Course
A method to evaluate trainee progression during simulation training at the Urology Simulation Boot Camp (USBC) Course

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate skills progression at the Urology Simulation Boot Camp (USBC), a course intended to provide urology trainees with 32 hours of 1:1 training on low and high-fidelity simulators.

DESIGN: In this single-group cohort study, trainees rotated through modules based on aspects of the United Kingdom urology residency curriculum and undertook a pre and postcourse MCQ. Specific procedural skill was evaluated by an expert and graded as either: "A"-Good (≥4 on a 5-point Likert Scale) or "B"-Poor (Likert scale of 1-3). Competence progression was calculated as the change in score between baseline and final assessments.

SETTING: The USBC was held at St James' University Hospital, Leeds, U.K.

PARTICIPANTS: Of the 34 trainees attended the second USBC, 33 trainees participated in all the pre and postcourse assessments. The mean duration of urology training prior to undertaking the USBC was 15 months.

RESULTS: Competence progression was assessed in 33 urology trainees. Mean MCQ scores improved by 16.7% (p < 0.001) between pre and postcourse assessment. At final assessment, 87.9% of trainees scored "A" in instrument knowledge and assembly compared to 44.4% at baseline (p < 0.001). There was a mean improvement of 439s (p < 0.001) in the time taken to complete the European-Basic Laparoscopic skills assessment.

CONCLUSIONS: The USBC has shown to aid trainees in competence progression during the simulation on a variety of urological skills; however, retention of skill in the long-term was undetermined. The use of our grading system is simple to understand and may be used in other simulation courses to guide participants with their future training needs.

1878-7452
215-222
Kailavasan, Mithun
b4160c62-ed66-4cb7-b57d-2b0983d3ece1
Hanchanale, Vishwanath
22cd57fb-779e-4fcf-a850-53da7239cb53
Rajpal, Sanjay
e5f2954a-6818-424e-b577-3cffdc280d2b
Morley, Roland
98a219f8-4059-4f16-81e5-84caa4a49f06
Mcllhenny, Craig
b3b767d4-bcda-4436-94aa-e41ab26169e2
Somani, Bhaskar
ab5fd1ce-02df-4b88-b25e-8ece396335d9
Nabi, Ghulam
20d3e635-ec9c-4b53-8703-f50b443196da
Gowda, Raj
705d56d2-2dd4-4b08-bb1b-afa25ad70ded
Jain, Sunjay
171f73f2-0592-4bc1-af12-f0c177dc0c67
Biyani, Chandra Shekhar
2d96e24e-f3f3-4ba5-8258-73ba26f63321
Myatt, Andy
7823bdeb-b523-4355-9c1a-f5aacac613d4
Kailavasan, Mithun
b4160c62-ed66-4cb7-b57d-2b0983d3ece1
Hanchanale, Vishwanath
22cd57fb-779e-4fcf-a850-53da7239cb53
Rajpal, Sanjay
e5f2954a-6818-424e-b577-3cffdc280d2b
Morley, Roland
98a219f8-4059-4f16-81e5-84caa4a49f06
Mcllhenny, Craig
b3b767d4-bcda-4436-94aa-e41ab26169e2
Somani, Bhaskar
ab5fd1ce-02df-4b88-b25e-8ece396335d9
Nabi, Ghulam
20d3e635-ec9c-4b53-8703-f50b443196da
Gowda, Raj
705d56d2-2dd4-4b08-bb1b-afa25ad70ded
Jain, Sunjay
171f73f2-0592-4bc1-af12-f0c177dc0c67
Biyani, Chandra Shekhar
2d96e24e-f3f3-4ba5-8258-73ba26f63321
Myatt, Andy
7823bdeb-b523-4355-9c1a-f5aacac613d4

Kailavasan, Mithun, Hanchanale, Vishwanath, Rajpal, Sanjay, Morley, Roland, Mcllhenny, Craig, Somani, Bhaskar, Nabi, Ghulam, Gowda, Raj, Jain, Sunjay, Biyani, Chandra Shekhar and Myatt, Andy (2019) A method to evaluate trainee progression during simulation training at the Urology Simulation Boot Camp (USBC) Course. Journal of Surgical Education, 76 (1), 215-222. (doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.06.020).

Record type: Article

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate skills progression at the Urology Simulation Boot Camp (USBC), a course intended to provide urology trainees with 32 hours of 1:1 training on low and high-fidelity simulators.

DESIGN: In this single-group cohort study, trainees rotated through modules based on aspects of the United Kingdom urology residency curriculum and undertook a pre and postcourse MCQ. Specific procedural skill was evaluated by an expert and graded as either: "A"-Good (≥4 on a 5-point Likert Scale) or "B"-Poor (Likert scale of 1-3). Competence progression was calculated as the change in score between baseline and final assessments.

SETTING: The USBC was held at St James' University Hospital, Leeds, U.K.

PARTICIPANTS: Of the 34 trainees attended the second USBC, 33 trainees participated in all the pre and postcourse assessments. The mean duration of urology training prior to undertaking the USBC was 15 months.

RESULTS: Competence progression was assessed in 33 urology trainees. Mean MCQ scores improved by 16.7% (p < 0.001) between pre and postcourse assessment. At final assessment, 87.9% of trainees scored "A" in instrument knowledge and assembly compared to 44.4% at baseline (p < 0.001). There was a mean improvement of 439s (p < 0.001) in the time taken to complete the European-Basic Laparoscopic skills assessment.

CONCLUSIONS: The USBC has shown to aid trainees in competence progression during the simulation on a variety of urological skills; however, retention of skill in the long-term was undetermined. The use of our grading system is simple to understand and may be used in other simulation courses to guide participants with their future training needs.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 31 August 2018
Published date: January 2019

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 433453
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/433453
ISSN: 1878-7452
PURE UUID: 4676a282-8535-4034-baac-9ee3b3874c45

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 22 Aug 2019 16:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 03:24

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Mithun Kailavasan
Author: Vishwanath Hanchanale
Author: Sanjay Rajpal
Author: Roland Morley
Author: Craig Mcllhenny
Author: Bhaskar Somani
Author: Ghulam Nabi
Author: Raj Gowda
Author: Sunjay Jain
Author: Chandra Shekhar Biyani
Author: Andy Myatt

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×