The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Validation of the endoscopic stone treatment step 1 (EST-s1): a novel EAU training and assessment tool for basic endoscopic stone treatment skills-a collaborative work by ESU, ESUT and EULIS

Validation of the endoscopic stone treatment step 1 (EST-s1): a novel EAU training and assessment tool for basic endoscopic stone treatment skills-a collaborative work by ESU, ESUT and EULIS
Validation of the endoscopic stone treatment step 1 (EST-s1): a novel EAU training and assessment tool for basic endoscopic stone treatment skills-a collaborative work by ESU, ESUT and EULIS

INTRODUCTION: The endoscopic stone treatment step 1 (EST s1) protocol has been developed after 2 years of collaborative work between different European Association of Urology (EAU) sections.

OBJECTIVES: In this study, we added construct validity evidence to the EST s1 curriculum.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The EST-s1 curriculum includes four standardized tasks: flexible cystoscopy, rigid cystoscopy, semi-rigid URS and flexible URS. Validation was performed during the annual 2016 EUREP meeting in Prague. 124 participants provided information on their endoscopic logbook and carried out these 4 tasks during a DVD recorded session. Recordings were anonymized and blindly assessed independently by five proctors. Inter-rater reliability was checked on a sample of five videos by the calculation of intra-class correlation coefficient. Task-specific clinical background of participants was correlated with their personal performance on the simulator. Breakpoint analysis was used to define the minimum number of performed cases, to be considered "proficient". "Proficient" and "Non-proficient" groups were compared for construct validity assessment. Likert scale-based questionnaires were used to test content and to comment on when the EST-s1 exams should be undertaken within the residency program.

RESULTS: 124 participants (105 final-year residents and 19 faculty members) took part in this study. The breakpoint analysis showed a significant change in performance curve at 36, 41, 67 and 206 s, respectively, corresponding to 30, 60, 25 and 120 clinical cases for each of the 4 tasks. EST-s1 was scored as a valid training tool, correctly representing the procedures performed in each task. Experts felt that this curriculum is best used during the third year of residency training.

CONCLUSION: Our validation study successfully demonstrated correlation between clinical expertise and EST-s1 tasks, adding construct validity evidence to it. Our work also demonstrates the successful collaboration established within various EAU sections.

0724-4983
Veneziano, Domenico
a0fa2b25-6ecb-47b5-afdc-34ff25ff2475
Ploumidis, Achilles
912f53a6-e680-4f6f-8ae9-2477f8584611
Proietti, Silvia
7f914fa5-58b1-4a55-9a48-4c995d26f512
Tokas, Theodoros
e1c89c4d-8f81-4026-9242-ea5448cbe188
Kamphuis, Guido
8479e4b3-ccdf-4841-b1d5-52f3b29d1c7b
Tripepi, Giovanni
5e5ea5bf-9052-443b-a6c1-fd9033160077
Van Cleynenbreugel, Ben
cba56742-0637-42b0-83ff-4d06808d5e57
Gozen, Ali
8e89790d-96ee-42b1-ba0b-5a065ddac057
Breda, Alberto
8ed64ba4-c528-42e1-8f07-02f6568de22c
Palou, Joan
aecd6bc2-2515-4d76-beb9-21c1fe763aca
Sarica, Kemal
19e388bc-ed93-42f8-8756-62e7d46dbf08
Liatsikos, Evangelos
ec526979-941a-45b8-9590-235d62546794
Ahmed, Kamran
caefe3f7-3dd4-4b9b-9be2-e1a1f9f2445a
Somani, Bhaskar K
ab5fd1ce-02df-4b88-b25e-8ece396335d9
ESU Training Group
Veneziano, Domenico
a0fa2b25-6ecb-47b5-afdc-34ff25ff2475
Ploumidis, Achilles
912f53a6-e680-4f6f-8ae9-2477f8584611
Proietti, Silvia
7f914fa5-58b1-4a55-9a48-4c995d26f512
Tokas, Theodoros
e1c89c4d-8f81-4026-9242-ea5448cbe188
Kamphuis, Guido
8479e4b3-ccdf-4841-b1d5-52f3b29d1c7b
Tripepi, Giovanni
5e5ea5bf-9052-443b-a6c1-fd9033160077
Van Cleynenbreugel, Ben
cba56742-0637-42b0-83ff-4d06808d5e57
Gozen, Ali
8e89790d-96ee-42b1-ba0b-5a065ddac057
Breda, Alberto
8ed64ba4-c528-42e1-8f07-02f6568de22c
Palou, Joan
aecd6bc2-2515-4d76-beb9-21c1fe763aca
Sarica, Kemal
19e388bc-ed93-42f8-8756-62e7d46dbf08
Liatsikos, Evangelos
ec526979-941a-45b8-9590-235d62546794
Ahmed, Kamran
caefe3f7-3dd4-4b9b-9be2-e1a1f9f2445a
Somani, Bhaskar K
ab5fd1ce-02df-4b88-b25e-8ece396335d9

ESU Training Group (2019) Validation of the endoscopic stone treatment step 1 (EST-s1): a novel EAU training and assessment tool for basic endoscopic stone treatment skills-a collaborative work by ESU, ESUT and EULIS. World Journal of Urology. (doi:10.1007/s00345-019-02736-4).

Record type: Article

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The endoscopic stone treatment step 1 (EST s1) protocol has been developed after 2 years of collaborative work between different European Association of Urology (EAU) sections.

OBJECTIVES: In this study, we added construct validity evidence to the EST s1 curriculum.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The EST-s1 curriculum includes four standardized tasks: flexible cystoscopy, rigid cystoscopy, semi-rigid URS and flexible URS. Validation was performed during the annual 2016 EUREP meeting in Prague. 124 participants provided information on their endoscopic logbook and carried out these 4 tasks during a DVD recorded session. Recordings were anonymized and blindly assessed independently by five proctors. Inter-rater reliability was checked on a sample of five videos by the calculation of intra-class correlation coefficient. Task-specific clinical background of participants was correlated with their personal performance on the simulator. Breakpoint analysis was used to define the minimum number of performed cases, to be considered "proficient". "Proficient" and "Non-proficient" groups were compared for construct validity assessment. Likert scale-based questionnaires were used to test content and to comment on when the EST-s1 exams should be undertaken within the residency program.

RESULTS: 124 participants (105 final-year residents and 19 faculty members) took part in this study. The breakpoint analysis showed a significant change in performance curve at 36, 41, 67 and 206 s, respectively, corresponding to 30, 60, 25 and 120 clinical cases for each of the 4 tasks. EST-s1 was scored as a valid training tool, correctly representing the procedures performed in each task. Experts felt that this curriculum is best used during the third year of residency training.

CONCLUSION: Our validation study successfully demonstrated correlation between clinical expertise and EST-s1 tasks, adding construct validity evidence to it. Our work also demonstrates the successful collaboration established within various EAU sections.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 18 March 2019
e-pub ahead of print date: 27 March 2019

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 433458
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/433458
ISSN: 0724-4983
PURE UUID: 45f9ff03-04c4-47fb-ae98-dd1fa8fef061

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 22 Aug 2019 16:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 03:23

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Domenico Veneziano
Author: Achilles Ploumidis
Author: Silvia Proietti
Author: Theodoros Tokas
Author: Guido Kamphuis
Author: Giovanni Tripepi
Author: Ben Van Cleynenbreugel
Author: Ali Gozen
Author: Alberto Breda
Author: Joan Palou
Author: Kemal Sarica
Author: Evangelos Liatsikos
Author: Kamran Ahmed
Corporate Author: ESU Training Group

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×