Seismic inversion for near-surface applications and the derivation of geomechanical properties
Seismic inversion for near-surface applications and the derivation of geomechanical properties
Seismic inversion methods broadly fall in to two categories; conversion of seismic event amplitudes in to reflectivity or the analysis primarily of seismic event arrival times (and waveform shape) to derive a velocity model. These are generically referred to as Acoustic Impedance (AI) inversion and Full Waveform Inversion (FWI) respectively, the former typically working from processed seismic reflectivity data and the latter being derived during the processing phase. Both procedures have application in the characterisation of the rock properties of shallow stratigraphic sections, indeed FWI is specifically designed (and limited to) no deeper than approximately 1500m below the mudline (though this depth is dependent on seismic acquisition parameters; notably cable length, water column height and subsurface velocity). This paper will review several different approaches to AI inversion, which can be calibrated to derive rock mechanical properties, and discuss their application to the near surface. The paper will also demonstrate how FWI can yield a high resolution image of near surface velocity which improves the seismic image and thus enhances AI inversion results. Case studies will be used to demonstrate the procedures and contrast the advantages and disadvantages of different methods.
Fogg, Anthony
c0610d4b-e88c-4598-b6fb-a9c1fb8db0be
3 June 2019
Fogg, Anthony
c0610d4b-e88c-4598-b6fb-a9c1fb8db0be
Fogg, Anthony
(2019)
Seismic inversion for near-surface applications and the derivation of geomechanical properties.
81st EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2019 Workshop Programme, ExCeL Centre, London, United Kingdom.
03 - 06 Jun 2019.
(doi:10.3997/2214-4609.201901921).
Record type:
Conference or Workshop Item
(Paper)
Abstract
Seismic inversion methods broadly fall in to two categories; conversion of seismic event amplitudes in to reflectivity or the analysis primarily of seismic event arrival times (and waveform shape) to derive a velocity model. These are generically referred to as Acoustic Impedance (AI) inversion and Full Waveform Inversion (FWI) respectively, the former typically working from processed seismic reflectivity data and the latter being derived during the processing phase. Both procedures have application in the characterisation of the rock properties of shallow stratigraphic sections, indeed FWI is specifically designed (and limited to) no deeper than approximately 1500m below the mudline (though this depth is dependent on seismic acquisition parameters; notably cable length, water column height and subsurface velocity). This paper will review several different approaches to AI inversion, which can be calibrated to derive rock mechanical properties, and discuss their application to the near surface. The paper will also demonstrate how FWI can yield a high resolution image of near surface velocity which improves the seismic image and thus enhances AI inversion results. Case studies will be used to demonstrate the procedures and contrast the advantages and disadvantages of different methods.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 3 June 2019
Venue - Dates:
81st EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2019 Workshop Programme, ExCeL Centre, London, United Kingdom, 2019-06-03 - 2019-06-06
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 433559
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/433559
PURE UUID: 2bb65ca9-68c5-4189-8760-a9d748836b2f
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 27 Aug 2019 16:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 03:37
Export record
Altmetrics
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics