The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Association between antipsychotic polypharmacy and outcomes for people with serious mental illness in England

Association between antipsychotic polypharmacy and outcomes for people with serious mental illness in England
Association between antipsychotic polypharmacy and outcomes for people with serious mental illness in England
Objective:
Although U.K. and international guidelines recommend monotherapy, antipsychotic polypharmacy among patients with serious mental illness is common in clinical practice. However, empirical evidence on its effectiveness is scarce. Therefore, the authors estimated the effectiveness of antipsychotic polypharmacy relative to monotherapy in terms of health care utilization and mortality.

Methods:
Primary care data from Clinical Practice Research Datalink, hospital data from Hospital Episode Statistics, and mortality data from the Office of National Statistics were linked to compile a cohort of patients with serious mental illness in England from 2000 to 2014. The antipsychotic prescribing profile of 17,255 adults who had at least one antipsychotic drug record during the period of observation was constructed from primary care medication records. Survival analysis models were estimated to identify the effect of antipsychotic polypharmacy on the time to first occurrence of each of three outcomes: unplanned hospital admissions (all cause), emergency department (ED) visits, and mortality.

Results:
Relative to monotherapy, antipsychotic polypharmacy was not associated with increased risk of unplanned hospital admission (hazard ratio [HR]=1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.98–1.32), ED visit (HR=0.95; 95% CI=0.80–1.14), or death (HR=1.02; 95% CI=0.76–1.37). Relative to not receiving antipsychotic medication, monotherapy was associated with a reduced hazard of unplanned admissions to the hospital and ED visits, but it had no effect on mortality.

Conclusions:
The study results support current guidelines for antipsychotic monotherapy in routine clinical practice. However, they also suggest that when clinicians have deemed antipsychotic polypharmacy necessary, health care utilization and mortality are not affected.
1075-2730
650-656
Kasteridis, Panagiotis
13b753ba-79bd-49a4-8e91-bf59cca1dca3
Ride, Jemimah
07af37dd-1e92-4fa1-a0ba-78e923924eab
Gutaker, Nils
5086548e-6da7-4f57-ad69-955c1c5459f8
Aylott, Lauren
0a8328e9-c5bb-408f-9703-37982af32ffb
Dare, Ceri R.J.
ef0362ac-3b92-4530-8bbd-002842ad7ed9
Doran, Tim
10a4fd47-ed06-49ec-ad8a-26a124730fd8
Gilbody, Simon
6d135882-a8df-444c-85aa-980dddef45a5
Goddard, Maria
0952a075-bb0b-4e94-88a6-119250906a38
Gravelle, Hugh
7bded0be-eaaa-4612-b246-5b0b3f132cce
Kendrick, Tony
c697a72c-c698-469d-8ac2-f00df40583e5
Mason, Anne
f23014c5-0733-4a71-9c3f-2cad48797ca2
Rice, Nigel
8fe595c4-447e-4282-861a-e9301044836e
Siddiqi, Najma
ed605626-563f-4d6c-b2e1-6f9c25dcc249
Williams, Rachael
37651ae7-0861-4588-b050-bc406bf0b839
Jacobs, Rowena
49686cdf-0222-4e1a-9d81-1914187fcec9
Kasteridis, Panagiotis
13b753ba-79bd-49a4-8e91-bf59cca1dca3
Ride, Jemimah
07af37dd-1e92-4fa1-a0ba-78e923924eab
Gutaker, Nils
5086548e-6da7-4f57-ad69-955c1c5459f8
Aylott, Lauren
0a8328e9-c5bb-408f-9703-37982af32ffb
Dare, Ceri R.J.
ef0362ac-3b92-4530-8bbd-002842ad7ed9
Doran, Tim
10a4fd47-ed06-49ec-ad8a-26a124730fd8
Gilbody, Simon
6d135882-a8df-444c-85aa-980dddef45a5
Goddard, Maria
0952a075-bb0b-4e94-88a6-119250906a38
Gravelle, Hugh
7bded0be-eaaa-4612-b246-5b0b3f132cce
Kendrick, Tony
c697a72c-c698-469d-8ac2-f00df40583e5
Mason, Anne
f23014c5-0733-4a71-9c3f-2cad48797ca2
Rice, Nigel
8fe595c4-447e-4282-861a-e9301044836e
Siddiqi, Najma
ed605626-563f-4d6c-b2e1-6f9c25dcc249
Williams, Rachael
37651ae7-0861-4588-b050-bc406bf0b839
Jacobs, Rowena
49686cdf-0222-4e1a-9d81-1914187fcec9

Kasteridis, Panagiotis, Ride, Jemimah, Gutaker, Nils, Aylott, Lauren, Dare, Ceri R.J., Doran, Tim, Gilbody, Simon, Goddard, Maria, Gravelle, Hugh, Kendrick, Tony, Mason, Anne, Rice, Nigel, Siddiqi, Najma, Williams, Rachael and Jacobs, Rowena (2019) Association between antipsychotic polypharmacy and outcomes for people with serious mental illness in England. Psychiatric Services, 70 (8), 650-656. (doi:10.1176/appi.ps.201800504).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objective:
Although U.K. and international guidelines recommend monotherapy, antipsychotic polypharmacy among patients with serious mental illness is common in clinical practice. However, empirical evidence on its effectiveness is scarce. Therefore, the authors estimated the effectiveness of antipsychotic polypharmacy relative to monotherapy in terms of health care utilization and mortality.

Methods:
Primary care data from Clinical Practice Research Datalink, hospital data from Hospital Episode Statistics, and mortality data from the Office of National Statistics were linked to compile a cohort of patients with serious mental illness in England from 2000 to 2014. The antipsychotic prescribing profile of 17,255 adults who had at least one antipsychotic drug record during the period of observation was constructed from primary care medication records. Survival analysis models were estimated to identify the effect of antipsychotic polypharmacy on the time to first occurrence of each of three outcomes: unplanned hospital admissions (all cause), emergency department (ED) visits, and mortality.

Results:
Relative to monotherapy, antipsychotic polypharmacy was not associated with increased risk of unplanned hospital admission (hazard ratio [HR]=1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.98–1.32), ED visit (HR=0.95; 95% CI=0.80–1.14), or death (HR=1.02; 95% CI=0.76–1.37). Relative to not receiving antipsychotic medication, monotherapy was associated with a reduced hazard of unplanned admissions to the hospital and ED visits, but it had no effect on mortality.

Conclusions:
The study results support current guidelines for antipsychotic monotherapy in routine clinical practice. However, they also suggest that when clinicians have deemed antipsychotic polypharmacy necessary, health care utilization and mortality are not affected.

Text
PS201800504.R1 - Accepted Manuscript
Download (98kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 21 March 2019
e-pub ahead of print date: 21 May 2019
Published date: August 2019

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 433692
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/433692
ISSN: 1075-2730
PURE UUID: 87d5bba0-4cad-4b26-b88f-c07d234dd710
ORCID for Tony Kendrick: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1618-9381

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 30 Aug 2019 16:30
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 02:46

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Panagiotis Kasteridis
Author: Jemimah Ride
Author: Nils Gutaker
Author: Lauren Aylott
Author: Ceri R.J. Dare
Author: Tim Doran
Author: Simon Gilbody
Author: Maria Goddard
Author: Hugh Gravelle
Author: Tony Kendrick ORCID iD
Author: Anne Mason
Author: Nigel Rice
Author: Najma Siddiqi
Author: Rachael Williams
Author: Rowena Jacobs

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×