Application of iterative reconstruction algorithms to mitigate CT-artefacts when measuring fiber reinforced polymer materials
Application of iterative reconstruction algorithms to mitigate CT-artefacts when measuring fiber reinforced polymer materials
In general, fiber reinforced polymer materials are being used in case of challenging mechanical requirements. Important parameters determining performance of such polymer composites are properties of the components as well as the quality of the fiber-polymer interface. For example, porosity or voids particularly at the interface will influence the overall performance of the composite negatively. Therefore, it is of importance to know the actual porosity value to e.g. calculate and predict the mechanical properties. In principle, a CT scan can provide the means to determine the amount, size, and shape of the voids in an X-ray transparent material. The difficulty, which arises in fully organic based i.e. carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites, is the small difference between absorption of X-rays in the carbon fibers versus the surrounding polymer matrix. At certain conditions, when single fibers need to be resolved and voids surrounding the fibers may exist, CT reconstruction artefacts introduced by standard algorithms are visible as “virtual” voids in large quantities severely limiting the correct determination of the actual porosity. On the other hand, in glass fiber reinforced polymer materials, the large density difference between fibers and matrix causes artefacts to appear, too. Specific experimental settings necessary to deal with the high absorption of the glass fibers (beam hardening enforces the use of X-ray filters) cause very low absorption differences between air and the polymer matrix and thus hardly provide information on the existence of voids. Iterative reconstruction techniques, however, are more robust against the encountered CT-reconstruction artifacts and may enable accurate determination of important sample features in polymer composite materials, and especially allow for accurate determination of voids or porosity. This work explores the use of two iterative versus standard reconstruction algorithms (CGLS and SIRT versus FDK) and validates the results with cross-sectional Optical Microscopy. The paper shows that iterative reconstruction algorithms outperform the standard reconstruction algorithm with respect to mitigating the influence of the CT reconstruction artefacts.
CT artefacts, Fiber reinforced polymers, Industrial applications, X-ray tomography
120-130
Wilbers, Arnold
073fb724-91ff-4fca-98b4-2b54763e6149
Biguri, Ander
738d1b66-9a99-446f-805d-032dd12445e3
Schillings, Jennifer
26f433e5-b42f-407f-bf57-eda07ec6599b
Loos, Joachim
ac239459-25d3-4fe6-824f-5c06c54bd4a5
26 August 2019
Wilbers, Arnold
073fb724-91ff-4fca-98b4-2b54763e6149
Biguri, Ander
738d1b66-9a99-446f-805d-032dd12445e3
Schillings, Jennifer
26f433e5-b42f-407f-bf57-eda07ec6599b
Loos, Joachim
ac239459-25d3-4fe6-824f-5c06c54bd4a5
Wilbers, Arnold, Biguri, Ander, Schillings, Jennifer and Loos, Joachim
(2019)
Application of iterative reconstruction algorithms to mitigate CT-artefacts when measuring fiber reinforced polymer materials.
Polymer, 177, .
(doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2019.06.004).
Abstract
In general, fiber reinforced polymer materials are being used in case of challenging mechanical requirements. Important parameters determining performance of such polymer composites are properties of the components as well as the quality of the fiber-polymer interface. For example, porosity or voids particularly at the interface will influence the overall performance of the composite negatively. Therefore, it is of importance to know the actual porosity value to e.g. calculate and predict the mechanical properties. In principle, a CT scan can provide the means to determine the amount, size, and shape of the voids in an X-ray transparent material. The difficulty, which arises in fully organic based i.e. carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites, is the small difference between absorption of X-rays in the carbon fibers versus the surrounding polymer matrix. At certain conditions, when single fibers need to be resolved and voids surrounding the fibers may exist, CT reconstruction artefacts introduced by standard algorithms are visible as “virtual” voids in large quantities severely limiting the correct determination of the actual porosity. On the other hand, in glass fiber reinforced polymer materials, the large density difference between fibers and matrix causes artefacts to appear, too. Specific experimental settings necessary to deal with the high absorption of the glass fibers (beam hardening enforces the use of X-ray filters) cause very low absorption differences between air and the polymer matrix and thus hardly provide information on the existence of voids. Iterative reconstruction techniques, however, are more robust against the encountered CT-reconstruction artifacts and may enable accurate determination of important sample features in polymer composite materials, and especially allow for accurate determination of voids or porosity. This work explores the use of two iterative versus standard reconstruction algorithms (CGLS and SIRT versus FDK) and validates the results with cross-sectional Optical Microscopy. The paper shows that iterative reconstruction algorithms outperform the standard reconstruction algorithm with respect to mitigating the influence of the CT reconstruction artefacts.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 1 June 2019
e-pub ahead of print date: 3 June 2019
Published date: 26 August 2019
Keywords:
CT artefacts, Fiber reinforced polymers, Industrial applications, X-ray tomography
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 433904
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/433904
ISSN: 0032-3861
PURE UUID: 6c8c905f-10f2-419d-b4cb-d9ba22f4ab72
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 05 Sep 2019 16:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 02:18
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Arnold Wilbers
Author:
Ander Biguri
Author:
Jennifer Schillings
Author:
Joachim Loos
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics