The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Nocturnal temperature-controlled laminar airflow device for adults with severe allergic asthma: the LASER RCT

Nocturnal temperature-controlled laminar airflow device for adults with severe allergic asthma: the LASER RCT
Nocturnal temperature-controlled laminar airflow device for adults with severe allergic asthma: the LASER RCT
Background
Severe asthma exacerbations are costly to patients and the NHS, and occur frequently in severely allergic patients.

Objective
To ascertain whether or not nocturnal temperature-controlled laminar airflow (TLA) device usage over 12 months can reduce severe exacerbations and improve asthma control and quality of life compared with a placebo device, while being cost-effective and acceptable to adults with severe allergic asthma.

Design
A pragmatic, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, superiority trial with qualitative interviews. The trial included an internal pilot with qualitative focus groups.

Setting
Fourteen hospitals in the UK that manage patients with severe asthma.

Participants
Adults (16–75 years) with severe, poorly controlled, exacerbation-prone asthma despite high-intensity treatment, and who are sensitised to a perennial indoor aeroallergen.

Intervention
Nocturnal, home-based TLA treatment using an Airsonett® (Airsonett AB, Ängelholm, Sweden) device. The comparator was a placebo device that was identical to the active device except that it did not deliver the laminar airflow. Participants were allocated 1 : 1 to TLA therapy or placebo, minimised by site, origin of case, baseline severe exacerbation frequency, maintenance oral corticosteroid use and pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second.

Main outcome measures
Primary outcome – frequency of severe asthma exacerbations occurring within the 12-month follow-up period, defined as worsening of asthma requiring systemic corticosteroids [≥ 30 mg of prednisolone or equivalent daily (or ≥ 50% increase in dose if on maintenance dose of ≥ 30 mg of prednisolone)] for ≥ 3 days. Secondary outcomes – changes in asthma control, lung function, asthma-specific and global quality of life for participants, adherence to the intervention, device acceptability, health-care resource use and cost-effectiveness.

Results
Between May 2014 and January 2016, 489 patients consented to participate in the trial, of whom 249 failed screening and 240 were randomised (n = 119 in the treatment group and n = 121 in the placebo group); all were analysed. In total, 202 participants (84%) reported use of the device for 9–12 months. Qualitative analyses showed high levels of acceptability. The mean [standard deviation (SD)] rate of severe exacerbations did not differ between groups [active 1.39 (1.57), placebo 1.48 (2.03); risk ratio 0.92, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.27; p = 0.616]. There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes for lung function, except for a reduction in mean daily peak expiratory flow [mean (SD) difference 14.7 l/minute (7.35 l/minute), 95% CI 0.32 to 29.1 l/minute; p = 0.045) for those in the active device group. There were no differences in asthma control or airway inflammation and no serious harms related to the device. No significant difference between the groups in quality-adjusted life-years gained over 1 year was observed. In addition, there was no difference in generic or disease-specific health-related quality of life overall, although statistically significant higher quality of life at month 6 was observed. Increases in quality of life were not sufficient to offset the annual costs associated with use of the TLA device.

Limitations
Missing outcome data could have resulted in an underestimation of exacerbations and rendered the study inconclusive.

Conclusions
Within the limits of the data, no consistent benefits of the active device were demonstrated, and the differences observed were not sufficient to make the device cost-effective. The types of patients who may benefit from the TLA device, and the reasons for large reductions in exacerbation frequency in severe asthma trials, which also incorporate other methods of recording exacerbations, need to be explored.

Trial registration
Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN46346208.
1366-5278
1-140
Kapoor, Melissa
29e64b36-3135-4b76-8b8b-6c9f883882d1
Storrar, Will
7776e86a-f32a-4137-b951-7cb8c2d3761a
Balls, Lara
daeee654-7078-4cf9-b2dc-8dac2987ad9f
Brown, Thomas P.
11103bde-7185-448e-8df5-b804c537c967
Mansur, Adel
61d14112-27ad-4a70-aec7-26d84dd59a5b
Hedley, Emma
177fcc48-9cb0-403e-b8b6-faa1b68594de
Jones, Tom
627e144d-4818-447d-a2ed-697c295cbaca
Roberts, Claire
3f1c1680-edf4-4be1-9d9d-babf15050068
Shirkey, Beverly
8e235ad1-0ddb-4aff-9663-7a55576eeb5f
Dutton, Susan
68910a13-96b2-4585-86bc-b1398e500281
Luengo-Fernandez, Ramon
ed6abe8d-64d2-44a6-9216-3ede3530e7fc
Little, Matthew
da729955-2e94-43f9-b1f1-5dfeee96f40c
Dewey, Ann
a816c1a9-9b4e-493c-9153-e79850903de5
Marshall, Sue
2184f2e3-d939-4ae8-a6cf-8060cccf51df
Fogg, Carole
42057537-d443-462a-8944-c804252c973b
Boughton, Keith
55072156-5dd3-485c-b906-e68771d2fa18
Rahman, Najib
16ffac72-7f1b-4ae1-9641-2ed9a96c71d8
Yu, Ly-Mee
469d90a0-84c1-4711-b4d7-dc34d5523217
Bradding, Peter
598dc459-0597-4c2f-bc29-cb30f4aa9097
Howarth, Peter
8f55da6f-b8de-4fc0-99a8-36ee223b590a
Chauhan, Anoop J.
cbff510d-6cdc-4058-8564-973c64fe6d8e
Kapoor, Melissa
29e64b36-3135-4b76-8b8b-6c9f883882d1
Storrar, Will
7776e86a-f32a-4137-b951-7cb8c2d3761a
Balls, Lara
daeee654-7078-4cf9-b2dc-8dac2987ad9f
Brown, Thomas P.
11103bde-7185-448e-8df5-b804c537c967
Mansur, Adel
61d14112-27ad-4a70-aec7-26d84dd59a5b
Hedley, Emma
177fcc48-9cb0-403e-b8b6-faa1b68594de
Jones, Tom
627e144d-4818-447d-a2ed-697c295cbaca
Roberts, Claire
3f1c1680-edf4-4be1-9d9d-babf15050068
Shirkey, Beverly
8e235ad1-0ddb-4aff-9663-7a55576eeb5f
Dutton, Susan
68910a13-96b2-4585-86bc-b1398e500281
Luengo-Fernandez, Ramon
ed6abe8d-64d2-44a6-9216-3ede3530e7fc
Little, Matthew
da729955-2e94-43f9-b1f1-5dfeee96f40c
Dewey, Ann
a816c1a9-9b4e-493c-9153-e79850903de5
Marshall, Sue
2184f2e3-d939-4ae8-a6cf-8060cccf51df
Fogg, Carole
42057537-d443-462a-8944-c804252c973b
Boughton, Keith
55072156-5dd3-485c-b906-e68771d2fa18
Rahman, Najib
16ffac72-7f1b-4ae1-9641-2ed9a96c71d8
Yu, Ly-Mee
469d90a0-84c1-4711-b4d7-dc34d5523217
Bradding, Peter
598dc459-0597-4c2f-bc29-cb30f4aa9097
Howarth, Peter
8f55da6f-b8de-4fc0-99a8-36ee223b590a
Chauhan, Anoop J.
cbff510d-6cdc-4058-8564-973c64fe6d8e

Kapoor, Melissa, Storrar, Will, Balls, Lara, Brown, Thomas P., Mansur, Adel, Hedley, Emma, Jones, Tom, Roberts, Claire, Shirkey, Beverly, Dutton, Susan, Luengo-Fernandez, Ramon, Little, Matthew, Dewey, Ann, Marshall, Sue, Fogg, Carole, Boughton, Keith, Rahman, Najib, Yu, Ly-Mee, Bradding, Peter, Howarth, Peter and Chauhan, Anoop J. (2019) Nocturnal temperature-controlled laminar airflow device for adults with severe allergic asthma: the LASER RCT. Health Technology Assessment, 23 (29), 1-140. (doi:10.3310/hta23290).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background
Severe asthma exacerbations are costly to patients and the NHS, and occur frequently in severely allergic patients.

Objective
To ascertain whether or not nocturnal temperature-controlled laminar airflow (TLA) device usage over 12 months can reduce severe exacerbations and improve asthma control and quality of life compared with a placebo device, while being cost-effective and acceptable to adults with severe allergic asthma.

Design
A pragmatic, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, superiority trial with qualitative interviews. The trial included an internal pilot with qualitative focus groups.

Setting
Fourteen hospitals in the UK that manage patients with severe asthma.

Participants
Adults (16–75 years) with severe, poorly controlled, exacerbation-prone asthma despite high-intensity treatment, and who are sensitised to a perennial indoor aeroallergen.

Intervention
Nocturnal, home-based TLA treatment using an Airsonett® (Airsonett AB, Ängelholm, Sweden) device. The comparator was a placebo device that was identical to the active device except that it did not deliver the laminar airflow. Participants were allocated 1 : 1 to TLA therapy or placebo, minimised by site, origin of case, baseline severe exacerbation frequency, maintenance oral corticosteroid use and pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second.

Main outcome measures
Primary outcome – frequency of severe asthma exacerbations occurring within the 12-month follow-up period, defined as worsening of asthma requiring systemic corticosteroids [≥ 30 mg of prednisolone or equivalent daily (or ≥ 50% increase in dose if on maintenance dose of ≥ 30 mg of prednisolone)] for ≥ 3 days. Secondary outcomes – changes in asthma control, lung function, asthma-specific and global quality of life for participants, adherence to the intervention, device acceptability, health-care resource use and cost-effectiveness.

Results
Between May 2014 and January 2016, 489 patients consented to participate in the trial, of whom 249 failed screening and 240 were randomised (n = 119 in the treatment group and n = 121 in the placebo group); all were analysed. In total, 202 participants (84%) reported use of the device for 9–12 months. Qualitative analyses showed high levels of acceptability. The mean [standard deviation (SD)] rate of severe exacerbations did not differ between groups [active 1.39 (1.57), placebo 1.48 (2.03); risk ratio 0.92, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.27; p = 0.616]. There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes for lung function, except for a reduction in mean daily peak expiratory flow [mean (SD) difference 14.7 l/minute (7.35 l/minute), 95% CI 0.32 to 29.1 l/minute; p = 0.045) for those in the active device group. There were no differences in asthma control or airway inflammation and no serious harms related to the device. No significant difference between the groups in quality-adjusted life-years gained over 1 year was observed. In addition, there was no difference in generic or disease-specific health-related quality of life overall, although statistically significant higher quality of life at month 6 was observed. Increases in quality of life were not sufficient to offset the annual costs associated with use of the TLA device.

Limitations
Missing outcome data could have resulted in an underestimation of exacerbations and rendered the study inconclusive.

Conclusions
Within the limits of the data, no consistent benefits of the active device were demonstrated, and the differences observed were not sufficient to make the device cost-effective. The types of patients who may benefit from the TLA device, and the reasons for large reductions in exacerbation frequency in severe asthma trials, which also incorporate other methods of recording exacerbations, need to be explored.

Trial registration
Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN46346208.

Text
Nocturnal temperature-controlled laminar airflow device for adults with severe allergic asthma the LASER RCT
Download (4MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 1 January 2019
e-pub ahead of print date: 1 June 2019
Published date: 1 June 2019

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 433919
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/433919
ISSN: 1366-5278
PURE UUID: bc35846b-08d2-4b9e-a8e8-5e3921a836ec
ORCID for Carole Fogg: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3000-6185

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 06 Sep 2019 16:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 04:40

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Melissa Kapoor
Author: Will Storrar
Author: Lara Balls
Author: Thomas P. Brown
Author: Adel Mansur
Author: Emma Hedley
Author: Tom Jones
Author: Claire Roberts
Author: Beverly Shirkey
Author: Susan Dutton
Author: Ramon Luengo-Fernandez
Author: Matthew Little
Author: Ann Dewey
Author: Sue Marshall
Author: Carole Fogg ORCID iD
Author: Keith Boughton
Author: Najib Rahman
Author: Ly-Mee Yu
Author: Peter Bradding
Author: Peter Howarth
Author: Anoop J. Chauhan

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×