Sex differences in the therapy of kidney and ureteral stones
Sex differences in the therapy of kidney and ureteral stones
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Better understanding of sex differences affecting urolithiasis may help us offer tailored treatment strategies to our patients.
RECENT FINDINGS: The incidence of urolithiasis is increasing and the male-to-female ratio has decreased from 3 : 1 to 1.3 : 1 between 1970 and 2000. In women, obesity has a larger effect on the risk of developing urolithiasis [odds ratio (OR) 1.35; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.33-1.37] compared with men (OR 1.04; 95% CI: 1.02-1.06). Urolithiasis is a risk factor for coronary artery disease in men (risk ratio = 1.23; 95% CI: 1.02-1.49) and for stroke in women (risk ratio = 1.12; 95% CI: 1.03-1.21). Women tolerate cystoscopic stent removal and shock wave lithotripsy better than men. For shock wave lithotripsy menopaused women have reported lower visual analog scale scores than menstruating women (P < 0.001). Female sex was an independent predictor of stone impaction (OR 1.15; 95% CI: 1.03-1.27) and postoperative sepsis after ureteroscopy (OR 2.31; 95% CI: 1.14-4.37).
SUMMARY: The sex gap in urolithiasis is closing. The changing role of women in society and dietary habits can be responsible for this epidemiologic shift. Women show a higher threshold for pain during urologic procedures, but they suffer from infectious complications more than men. Urolithiasis is a risk factor for cardiovascular events in both sexes.
261-266
Özsoy, Mehmet
803e3d87-44f0-48f7-a4f9-22e89e78430a
Somani, Bhaskar
ab5fd1ce-02df-4b88-b25e-8ece396335d9
Seitz, Christian
3714675a-0201-4a20-94bf-1bd29684ea7e
Veser, Julian
ef155215-aa0f-45b9-be57-4799fceacf94
Kallidonis, Panagiotis
85038e98-6c7a-487b-8b9d-839fabb84ada
1 May 2019
Özsoy, Mehmet
803e3d87-44f0-48f7-a4f9-22e89e78430a
Somani, Bhaskar
ab5fd1ce-02df-4b88-b25e-8ece396335d9
Seitz, Christian
3714675a-0201-4a20-94bf-1bd29684ea7e
Veser, Julian
ef155215-aa0f-45b9-be57-4799fceacf94
Kallidonis, Panagiotis
85038e98-6c7a-487b-8b9d-839fabb84ada
Özsoy, Mehmet, Somani, Bhaskar, Seitz, Christian, Veser, Julian and Kallidonis, Panagiotis
(2019)
Sex differences in the therapy of kidney and ureteral stones.
Current Opinion in Urology, 29 (3), .
(doi:10.1097/MOU.0000000000000604).
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Better understanding of sex differences affecting urolithiasis may help us offer tailored treatment strategies to our patients.
RECENT FINDINGS: The incidence of urolithiasis is increasing and the male-to-female ratio has decreased from 3 : 1 to 1.3 : 1 between 1970 and 2000. In women, obesity has a larger effect on the risk of developing urolithiasis [odds ratio (OR) 1.35; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.33-1.37] compared with men (OR 1.04; 95% CI: 1.02-1.06). Urolithiasis is a risk factor for coronary artery disease in men (risk ratio = 1.23; 95% CI: 1.02-1.49) and for stroke in women (risk ratio = 1.12; 95% CI: 1.03-1.21). Women tolerate cystoscopic stent removal and shock wave lithotripsy better than men. For shock wave lithotripsy menopaused women have reported lower visual analog scale scores than menstruating women (P < 0.001). Female sex was an independent predictor of stone impaction (OR 1.15; 95% CI: 1.03-1.27) and postoperative sepsis after ureteroscopy (OR 2.31; 95% CI: 1.14-4.37).
SUMMARY: The sex gap in urolithiasis is closing. The changing role of women in society and dietary habits can be responsible for this epidemiologic shift. Women show a higher threshold for pain during urologic procedures, but they suffer from infectious complications more than men. Urolithiasis is a risk factor for cardiovascular events in both sexes.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
e-pub ahead of print date: 1 May 2019
Published date: 1 May 2019
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 433944
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/433944
ISSN: 0963-0643
PURE UUID: 876f6ad3-62b8-40ee-b3c8-d1ca83b32426
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 06 Sep 2019 16:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 01:39
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Mehmet Özsoy
Author:
Christian Seitz
Author:
Julian Veser
Author:
Panagiotis Kallidonis
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics