The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Sex differences in the therapy of kidney and ureteral stones

Sex differences in the therapy of kidney and ureteral stones
Sex differences in the therapy of kidney and ureteral stones

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Better understanding of sex differences affecting urolithiasis may help us offer tailored treatment strategies to our patients.

RECENT FINDINGS: The incidence of urolithiasis is increasing and the male-to-female ratio has decreased from 3 : 1 to 1.3 : 1 between 1970 and 2000. In women, obesity has a larger effect on the risk of developing urolithiasis [odds ratio (OR) 1.35; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.33-1.37] compared with men (OR 1.04; 95% CI: 1.02-1.06). Urolithiasis is a risk factor for coronary artery disease in men (risk ratio = 1.23; 95% CI: 1.02-1.49) and for stroke in women (risk ratio = 1.12; 95% CI: 1.03-1.21). Women tolerate cystoscopic stent removal and shock wave lithotripsy better than men. For shock wave lithotripsy menopaused women have reported lower visual analog scale scores than menstruating women (P < 0.001). Female sex was an independent predictor of stone impaction (OR 1.15; 95% CI: 1.03-1.27) and postoperative sepsis after ureteroscopy (OR 2.31; 95% CI: 1.14-4.37).

SUMMARY: The sex gap in urolithiasis is closing. The changing role of women in society and dietary habits can be responsible for this epidemiologic shift. Women show a higher threshold for pain during urologic procedures, but they suffer from infectious complications more than men. Urolithiasis is a risk factor for cardiovascular events in both sexes.

0963-0643
261-266
Özsoy, Mehmet
803e3d87-44f0-48f7-a4f9-22e89e78430a
Somani, Bhaskar
ab5fd1ce-02df-4b88-b25e-8ece396335d9
Seitz, Christian
3714675a-0201-4a20-94bf-1bd29684ea7e
Veser, Julian
ef155215-aa0f-45b9-be57-4799fceacf94
Kallidonis, Panagiotis
85038e98-6c7a-487b-8b9d-839fabb84ada
Özsoy, Mehmet
803e3d87-44f0-48f7-a4f9-22e89e78430a
Somani, Bhaskar
ab5fd1ce-02df-4b88-b25e-8ece396335d9
Seitz, Christian
3714675a-0201-4a20-94bf-1bd29684ea7e
Veser, Julian
ef155215-aa0f-45b9-be57-4799fceacf94
Kallidonis, Panagiotis
85038e98-6c7a-487b-8b9d-839fabb84ada

Özsoy, Mehmet, Somani, Bhaskar, Seitz, Christian, Veser, Julian and Kallidonis, Panagiotis (2019) Sex differences in the therapy of kidney and ureteral stones. Current Opinion in Urology, 29 (3), 261-266. (doi:10.1097/MOU.0000000000000604).

Record type: Article

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Better understanding of sex differences affecting urolithiasis may help us offer tailored treatment strategies to our patients.

RECENT FINDINGS: The incidence of urolithiasis is increasing and the male-to-female ratio has decreased from 3 : 1 to 1.3 : 1 between 1970 and 2000. In women, obesity has a larger effect on the risk of developing urolithiasis [odds ratio (OR) 1.35; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.33-1.37] compared with men (OR 1.04; 95% CI: 1.02-1.06). Urolithiasis is a risk factor for coronary artery disease in men (risk ratio = 1.23; 95% CI: 1.02-1.49) and for stroke in women (risk ratio = 1.12; 95% CI: 1.03-1.21). Women tolerate cystoscopic stent removal and shock wave lithotripsy better than men. For shock wave lithotripsy menopaused women have reported lower visual analog scale scores than menstruating women (P < 0.001). Female sex was an independent predictor of stone impaction (OR 1.15; 95% CI: 1.03-1.27) and postoperative sepsis after ureteroscopy (OR 2.31; 95% CI: 1.14-4.37).

SUMMARY: The sex gap in urolithiasis is closing. The changing role of women in society and dietary habits can be responsible for this epidemiologic shift. Women show a higher threshold for pain during urologic procedures, but they suffer from infectious complications more than men. Urolithiasis is a risk factor for cardiovascular events in both sexes.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 1 May 2019
Published date: 1 May 2019

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 433944
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/433944
ISSN: 0963-0643
PURE UUID: 876f6ad3-62b8-40ee-b3c8-d1ca83b32426

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 06 Sep 2019 16:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 01:39

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Mehmet Özsoy
Author: Bhaskar Somani
Author: Christian Seitz
Author: Julian Veser
Author: Panagiotis Kallidonis

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×