The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Interpregnancy weight change and premature birth:: findings from a population-based cohort in the south of England

Interpregnancy weight change and premature birth:: findings from a population-based cohort in the south of England
Interpregnancy weight change and premature birth:: findings from a population-based cohort in the south of England
Background: premature birth (<37 weeks gestation) is linked to maternal weight. However, the impact of maternal interpregnancy weight change on premature birth is unclear. The objective of this study was to examine the association between maternal interpregnancy weight change and premature birth, in a population-based cohort. Methods: data from 2003 to 2018 from one maternity centre in England was used to produce two cohorts. The primary cohort (n=14,961 women) consisted of first and second live-birth pregnancies. The secondary cohort (n=5,108 women) consisted of second and third live-birth pregnancies. Logistic regression was used to look for associations between interpregnancy weight change and premature birth, whilst adjusting for covariates at second or third pregnancy (maternal age, ethnicity, educational achievement, employment status, co-morbidities, pregnancy complications, smoking status, previous premature birth, sex of the infant, fertility treatment), BMI and gestational age at initial pregnancy booking appointment and interpregnancy interval. Subgroup analyses were performed by booking BMI group at initial pregnancy. Results: more women gained weight (>1 kg/m2, primary cohort: 47.1%, secondary cohort: 46.5%) than lost weight (>1 kg/m2, primary cohort: 15.8%, secondary cohort: 18.1%) between pregnancies. The median weight change was 0.8 kg/m2 between pregnancies in both primary (IQR -0.4 to 2.4 kg/m2) and secondary (IQR -0.5 to 2.4 kg/m2) cohorts. Primary cohort: 3.4% (n=514) of second pregnancy births were premature births. Weight loss (>3 kg/m2) was associated with increased risk of premature birth (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 3.50, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.78–6.88), in women who were normal weight (BMI 18.5–25 kg/m2) at the start of their first pregnancy. Weight gain >1 kg/m2 was not associated with the outcome in any of the initial BMI categories. Secondary cohort: 4.2% (n=212) of third pregnancy births were premature births. Losing >3 kg/m2 was associated with increased risk of premature birth (aOR 2.01, 95% CI 1.05–3.87) when analysing the whole sample, but not when restricting the analysis to overweight or obese women at the start of the second pregnancy. Conclusion: interpregnancy weight loss in women who were normal weight in their first pregnancy was associated with increased risk of premature birth. No such association was found when the analysis was restricted to women who were overweight or obese in their previous pregnancy whether it was first or second. Interpregnancy weight gain was not associated with premature birth. Current national guidelines encouraging obese women to lose weight before a pregnancy should be followed, in order to reduce other maternal and offspring adverse outcomes of maternal obesity.
0143-005X
Grove, G.
aa73d66b-af26-4f94-afeb-04c89fe1debf
Ziauddeen, N.
8b233a4a-9763-410b-90c7-df5c7d1a26e4
Alwan, N. A.
0d37b320-f325-4ed3-ba51-0fe2866d5382
Grove, G.
aa73d66b-af26-4f94-afeb-04c89fe1debf
Ziauddeen, N.
8b233a4a-9763-410b-90c7-df5c7d1a26e4
Alwan, N. A.
0d37b320-f325-4ed3-ba51-0fe2866d5382

Grove, G., Ziauddeen, N. and Alwan, N. A. (2019) Interpregnancy weight change and premature birth:: findings from a population-based cohort in the south of England. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 73, [P15]. (doi:10.1136/jech-2019-SSMabstracts.166).

Record type: Meeting abstract

Abstract

Background: premature birth (<37 weeks gestation) is linked to maternal weight. However, the impact of maternal interpregnancy weight change on premature birth is unclear. The objective of this study was to examine the association between maternal interpregnancy weight change and premature birth, in a population-based cohort. Methods: data from 2003 to 2018 from one maternity centre in England was used to produce two cohorts. The primary cohort (n=14,961 women) consisted of first and second live-birth pregnancies. The secondary cohort (n=5,108 women) consisted of second and third live-birth pregnancies. Logistic regression was used to look for associations between interpregnancy weight change and premature birth, whilst adjusting for covariates at second or third pregnancy (maternal age, ethnicity, educational achievement, employment status, co-morbidities, pregnancy complications, smoking status, previous premature birth, sex of the infant, fertility treatment), BMI and gestational age at initial pregnancy booking appointment and interpregnancy interval. Subgroup analyses were performed by booking BMI group at initial pregnancy. Results: more women gained weight (>1 kg/m2, primary cohort: 47.1%, secondary cohort: 46.5%) than lost weight (>1 kg/m2, primary cohort: 15.8%, secondary cohort: 18.1%) between pregnancies. The median weight change was 0.8 kg/m2 between pregnancies in both primary (IQR -0.4 to 2.4 kg/m2) and secondary (IQR -0.5 to 2.4 kg/m2) cohorts. Primary cohort: 3.4% (n=514) of second pregnancy births were premature births. Weight loss (>3 kg/m2) was associated with increased risk of premature birth (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 3.50, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.78–6.88), in women who were normal weight (BMI 18.5–25 kg/m2) at the start of their first pregnancy. Weight gain >1 kg/m2 was not associated with the outcome in any of the initial BMI categories. Secondary cohort: 4.2% (n=212) of third pregnancy births were premature births. Losing >3 kg/m2 was associated with increased risk of premature birth (aOR 2.01, 95% CI 1.05–3.87) when analysing the whole sample, but not when restricting the analysis to overweight or obese women at the start of the second pregnancy. Conclusion: interpregnancy weight loss in women who were normal weight in their first pregnancy was associated with increased risk of premature birth. No such association was found when the analysis was restricted to women who were overweight or obese in their previous pregnancy whether it was first or second. Interpregnancy weight gain was not associated with premature birth. Current national guidelines encouraging obese women to lose weight before a pregnancy should be followed, in order to reduce other maternal and offspring adverse outcomes of maternal obesity.

Text
2019_JECH_IP weight change_preterm (abstract)
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy

More information

Published date: 3 September 2019
Additional Information: Poster Programme

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 434048
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/434048
ISSN: 0143-005X
PURE UUID: 94c7d022-a9d6-4a3f-ae92-c34e56f9274c
ORCID for G. Grove: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-8323-5133
ORCID for N. Ziauddeen: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-8964-5029
ORCID for N. A. Alwan: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-4134-8463

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 11 Sep 2019 16:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 04:45

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: G. Grove ORCID iD
Author: N. Ziauddeen ORCID iD
Author: N. A. Alwan ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×