Digital interventions for parents of acutely ill children and their treatment-seeking behaviour: a systematic review
Digital interventions for parents of acutely ill children and their treatment-seeking behaviour: a systematic review
Background Consultations for self-limiting infections in children are increasing. It has been proposed that digital technology could be used to enable parents' decision making in terms of self-care and treatment seeking. Aim To evaluate the evidence that digital interventions facilitate parents deciding whether to self-care or seek treatment for acute illnesses in children. Design and setting Systematic review of studies undertaken worldwide. Method Searches of MEDLINE and EMBASE were made to identify studies (of any design) published between database inception and January 2019 that assessed digital interventions for parents of children (from any healthcare setting) with acute illnesses. The primary outcome of interest was whether the use of digital interventions reduced the use of urgent care services. Results Three studies were included in the review. They assessed two apps and one website: Children's On-Call - a US advice-only app; Should I See a Doctor? - a Dutch self-triage app for any acute illness; and Strategy for Off-Site Rapid Triage (SORT) for Kids - a US self-triage website for influenza-like illness. None of the studies involved parents during intervention development and it was shown that many parents did not find the two apps easy to use. The sensitivity of self-triage interventions was 84% for Should I See a Doctor? compared with nurse triage, and 93.3% for SORT for Kids compared with the need for emergency-department intervention; however, both had lower specificity (74% and 13%, respectively). None of the interventions demonstrated reduced use of urgent-care services. Conclusion There is little evidence to support the use of digital interventions to help parent and/or carers looking after children with acute illness. Future research should involve parents during intervention development, and adequately powered trials are needed to assess the impact of such interventions on health services and the identification of children who are seriously ill.
Acute disease, Child health, Digital intervention, Mhealth, Primary care
e172-e178
Donovan, Emily
b7b59e0a-40f0-43a3-aa52-e832f72db058
Wilcox, Christopher
e2c4c36a-e2e5-43a5-9fd6-7198cc15dd53
Patel, Sanjay
bc976df6-0414-459f-8390-3eca85e07d97
Little, Paul
1bf2d1f7-200c-47a5-ab16-fe5a8756a777
Hay, Alastair
e493ad13-cd46-4587-88f8-45f789fdb878
Willcox, Merlin
dad5b622-9ac2-417d-9b2e-aad41b64ffea
March 2020
Donovan, Emily
b7b59e0a-40f0-43a3-aa52-e832f72db058
Wilcox, Christopher
e2c4c36a-e2e5-43a5-9fd6-7198cc15dd53
Patel, Sanjay
bc976df6-0414-459f-8390-3eca85e07d97
Little, Paul
1bf2d1f7-200c-47a5-ab16-fe5a8756a777
Hay, Alastair
e493ad13-cd46-4587-88f8-45f789fdb878
Willcox, Merlin
dad5b622-9ac2-417d-9b2e-aad41b64ffea
Donovan, Emily, Wilcox, Christopher, Patel, Sanjay, Little, Paul, Hay, Alastair and Willcox, Merlin
(2020)
Digital interventions for parents of acutely ill children and their treatment-seeking behaviour: a systematic review.
British Journal of General Practice, 70 (692), .
(doi:10.3399/bjgp20X708209).
Abstract
Background Consultations for self-limiting infections in children are increasing. It has been proposed that digital technology could be used to enable parents' decision making in terms of self-care and treatment seeking. Aim To evaluate the evidence that digital interventions facilitate parents deciding whether to self-care or seek treatment for acute illnesses in children. Design and setting Systematic review of studies undertaken worldwide. Method Searches of MEDLINE and EMBASE were made to identify studies (of any design) published between database inception and January 2019 that assessed digital interventions for parents of children (from any healthcare setting) with acute illnesses. The primary outcome of interest was whether the use of digital interventions reduced the use of urgent care services. Results Three studies were included in the review. They assessed two apps and one website: Children's On-Call - a US advice-only app; Should I See a Doctor? - a Dutch self-triage app for any acute illness; and Strategy for Off-Site Rapid Triage (SORT) for Kids - a US self-triage website for influenza-like illness. None of the studies involved parents during intervention development and it was shown that many parents did not find the two apps easy to use. The sensitivity of self-triage interventions was 84% for Should I See a Doctor? compared with nurse triage, and 93.3% for SORT for Kids compared with the need for emergency-department intervention; however, both had lower specificity (74% and 13%, respectively). None of the interventions demonstrated reduced use of urgent-care services. Conclusion There is little evidence to support the use of digital interventions to help parent and/or carers looking after children with acute illness. Future research should involve parents during intervention development, and adequately powered trials are needed to assess the impact of such interventions on health services and the identification of children who are seriously ill.
Text
BJGP-2019-0432.R1_Proof_hi
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 7 August 2019
e-pub ahead of print date: 27 February 2020
Published date: March 2020
Additional Information:
Funding Information:
The salary of Merlin L Willcox was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), under grant: CL-2016-26-005. Emily Donovan is an NIHR-funded academic clinical fellow.
Publisher Copyright:
© British Journal of General Practice
Keywords:
Acute disease, Child health, Digital intervention, Mhealth, Primary care
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 434152
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/434152
ISSN: 0960-1643
PURE UUID: 0a5e5dbe-ac9c-4cc9-984b-cf12034b59b8
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 13 Sep 2019 16:30
Last modified: 12 Jul 2024 04:04
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Emily Donovan
Author:
Sanjay Patel
Author:
Alastair Hay
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics