The Scrutiny Universe: The House of Commons Select Committees and the Psychology of Group Processes
The Scrutiny Universe: The House of Commons Select Committees and the Psychology of Group Processes
It is a frequent complaint in British politics that government is too strong and not properly held to account by parliament. The House of Commons departmental select committees were designed to address this concern but their record has been mixed. This three-year project will pursue in-depth analysis of the select committee system - employing interviews, documentary and data analysis - designed to address some fundamental questions: How do accountability mechanisms develop and work at Westminster? Is government subjected to rigorous scrutiny? How can scrutiny by select committees, and by extension, parliament, be improved? The project has three research perspectives. First, it will analyse select committees through the lens of social psychology and the insights of the group processes literature, to help answer a key question: how do MPs manage their party identities in the context of 'all-party' committee environments? Second, it will probe the 'scrutiny universes' inhabited by select committees, universes which can expand or contract depending on the nature of individual committees and the way they perceive their scrutiny job. Finally, it will explore the impact of select committee scrutiny on parliament, government and the media, by examining how select committee work is discussed in the House of Commons, how government actors perceive the scrutiny impact of select committees, and also how the
Kelso, Alexandra
e9f198bb-27f8-412a-9360-aff01d578096
Kelso, Alexandra
e9f198bb-27f8-412a-9360-aff01d578096
Kelso, Alexandra
(2014)
The Scrutiny Universe: The House of Commons Select Committees and the Psychology of Group Processes.
UK Data Archive
doi:10.5255/UKDA-SN-851238
[Dataset]
Abstract
It is a frequent complaint in British politics that government is too strong and not properly held to account by parliament. The House of Commons departmental select committees were designed to address this concern but their record has been mixed. This three-year project will pursue in-depth analysis of the select committee system - employing interviews, documentary and data analysis - designed to address some fundamental questions: How do accountability mechanisms develop and work at Westminster? Is government subjected to rigorous scrutiny? How can scrutiny by select committees, and by extension, parliament, be improved? The project has three research perspectives. First, it will analyse select committees through the lens of social psychology and the insights of the group processes literature, to help answer a key question: how do MPs manage their party identities in the context of 'all-party' committee environments? Second, it will probe the 'scrutiny universes' inhabited by select committees, universes which can expand or contract depending on the nature of individual committees and the way they perceive their scrutiny job. Finally, it will explore the impact of select committee scrutiny on parliament, government and the media, by examining how select committee work is discussed in the House of Commons, how government actors perceive the scrutiny impact of select committees, and also how the
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 2014
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 434235
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/434235
PURE UUID: d1cfc2d8-03f8-44eb-ac32-cb0e48f46d43
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 17 Sep 2019 16:30
Last modified: 05 May 2023 15:21
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Creator:
Alexandra Kelso
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics