Determining soil stress beneath a tire: measurements and simulations
Determining soil stress beneath a tire: measurements and simulations
This study measured soil stress underneath a rolling wheel by using two different types of sensors: a load cell type probe referred to as an Arvidsson probe to read vertical soil stress and a fluid inclusion type sensor referred to as a Bolling probe to read soil mean normal stress. Measurements were compared with simulations using a semi-empirical as well as a finite element model. The latter allowed us to consider a layered soil profile as well as an elastoplastic constitutive relationship in the simulations. In addition, the finite element model was used to quantify the ratio between the Bolling probe pressure and the soil mean normal stress. The Bolling probe pressure was found to be primarily a function of the soil’s Poisson ratio, which supports findings from earlier studies. Our results showed better agreement between measurements and simulations for vertical stress (obtained from the Arvidsson probe readings) than for mean normal stress (calculated from the Bolling probe measurements). The finite element simulations revealed that soil properties had little influence on vertical stress, and the distribution with depth of the vertical stress could be well described by the classical Boussinesq solution. However, soil properties had a significant impact on the mean normal stress. The widely used semi-empirical Fröhlich model performed poorly, which may have been because of an inconsistency in the model assumptions.
541
Keller, Thomas
6c0da011-9f4b-49ba-8aa0-2feef74ade4b
Ruiz, Siul
d79b3b82-7c0d-47cc-9616-11d29e6a41bd
Stettler, Matthias
7cb0b681-16a3-4336-80c5-04fd73b5ad88
Berli, Markus
74af754f-01e7-4624-a05e-e98572e8f218
24 June 2016
Keller, Thomas
6c0da011-9f4b-49ba-8aa0-2feef74ade4b
Ruiz, Siul
d79b3b82-7c0d-47cc-9616-11d29e6a41bd
Stettler, Matthias
7cb0b681-16a3-4336-80c5-04fd73b5ad88
Berli, Markus
74af754f-01e7-4624-a05e-e98572e8f218
Keller, Thomas, Ruiz, Siul, Stettler, Matthias and Berli, Markus
(2016)
Determining soil stress beneath a tire: measurements and simulations.
SSSAJ Soil Science Society of America Journal, 80 (3), .
(doi:10.2136/sssaj2015.07.0252).
Abstract
This study measured soil stress underneath a rolling wheel by using two different types of sensors: a load cell type probe referred to as an Arvidsson probe to read vertical soil stress and a fluid inclusion type sensor referred to as a Bolling probe to read soil mean normal stress. Measurements were compared with simulations using a semi-empirical as well as a finite element model. The latter allowed us to consider a layered soil profile as well as an elastoplastic constitutive relationship in the simulations. In addition, the finite element model was used to quantify the ratio between the Bolling probe pressure and the soil mean normal stress. The Bolling probe pressure was found to be primarily a function of the soil’s Poisson ratio, which supports findings from earlier studies. Our results showed better agreement between measurements and simulations for vertical stress (obtained from the Arvidsson probe readings) than for mean normal stress (calculated from the Bolling probe measurements). The finite element simulations revealed that soil properties had little influence on vertical stress, and the distribution with depth of the vertical stress could be well described by the classical Boussinesq solution. However, soil properties had a significant impact on the mean normal stress. The widely used semi-empirical Fröhlich model performed poorly, which may have been because of an inconsistency in the model assumptions.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 24 June 2016
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 434286
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/434286
ISSN: 0361-5995
PURE UUID: 04e88213-7949-4b81-bba6-6023de3d212c
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 18 Sep 2019 16:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 04:07
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Thomas Keller
Author:
Matthias Stettler
Author:
Markus Berli
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics